This section provides key information about compounds under investigation for therapeutic use. The MSDF editorial staff has a list of approximately 100 compounds whose entries are gradually making their way into the database. In the meantime, please let the editors know about crucial pieces of missing information from the existing records and tell us which compounds you would like to see next.
Drug-Development Pipeline
Search Research Resources
Displaying 28 drugs.
| Name | Class | Target | Status for MS | Administration | Commercial |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alemtuzumab |
|
|
|
|
|
| BGC20-0134 |
|
|
|
|
|
| BIIB033 |
|
|
|
|
|
| Cladribine |
|
|
|
|
|
| Cyclophosphamide |
|
|
|
|
|
| Daclizumab |
|
|
|
|
|
| Dalfampridine |
|
|
|
|
|
| Dimethyl fumarate |
|
|
|
|
|
| Estriol |
|
|
|
|
|
| Fingolimod |
|
|
|
|
|
| Firategrast |
|
|
|
|
|
| Flupirtine |
|
|
|
|
|
| Glatiramer acetate |
|
|
|
|
|
| Interferon beta-1a |
|
|
|
|
|
| Interferon beta-1b |
|
|
|
|
|
| Laquinimod |
|
|
|
|
|
| Masitinib |
|
|
|
|
|
| Mitoxantrone |
|
|
|
|
|
| Mycophenolate Mofetil |
|
|
|
|
|
| Natalizumab |
|
|
|
|
|
| Ocrelizumab |
|
|
|
|
|
| Ofatumumab |
|
|
|
|
|
| ONO-4641 |
|
|
|
|
|
| Rituximab |
|
|
|
|
|
| RPC1063 |
|
|
|
|
|
| RTL1000 |
|
|
|
|
|
| Teriflunomide |
|
|
|
|
|
| Ustekinumab |
|
|
|
|
| Name | Trade name | Synonyms | Systematic name |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alemtuzumab |
|
|
|
| BGC20-0134 |
|
||
| BIIB033 |
|
||
| Cladribine |
|
|
|
| Cyclophosphamide |
|
|
|
| Daclizumab |
|
|
|
| Dalfampridine |
|
|
|
| Dimethyl fumarate |
|
|
|
| Estriol |
|
|
|
| Fingolimod |
|
|
|
| Firategrast |
|
|
|
| Flupirtine |
|
|
|
| Glatiramer acetate |
|
|
|
| Interferon beta-1a |
|
|
|
| Interferon beta-1b |
|
|
|
| Laquinimod |
|
|
|
| Masitinib |
|
|
|
| Mitoxantrone |
|
|
|
| Mycophenolate Mofetil |
|
|
|
| Natalizumab |
|
|
|
| Ocrelizumab |
|
|
|
| Ofatumumab |
|
|
|
| ONO-4641 |
|
|
|
| Rituximab |
|
|
|
| RPC1063 | |||
| RTL1000 |
|
|
|
| Teriflunomide |
|
|
|
| Ustekinumab |
|
|
|
| Name | Class | Target | Properties | Mechanism/Effects (Human) | Mechanism/Effects (Animal) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alemtuzumab |
|
|
|
|
|
| BGC20-0134 |
|
|
|
||
| BIIB033 |
|
|
|
||
| Cladribine |
|
|
|
|
|
| Cyclophosphamide |
|
|
|
|
|
| Daclizumab |
|
|
|
||
| Dalfampridine |
|
|
|
|
|
| Dimethyl fumarate |
|
|
|
|
|
| Estriol |
|
|
|
|
|
| Fingolimod |
|
|
|
|
|
| Firategrast |
|
|
|
||
| Flupirtine |
|
|
|
|
|
| Glatiramer acetate |
|
|
|
|
|
| Interferon beta-1a |
|
|
|
|
|
| Interferon beta-1b |
|
|
|
|
|
| Laquinimod |
|
|
|
|
|
| Masitinib |
|
|
|
|
|
| Mitoxantrone |
|
|
|
|
|
| Mycophenolate Mofetil |
|
|
|
|
|
| Natalizumab |
|
|
|
|
|
| Ocrelizumab |
|
|
|
|
|
| Ofatumumab |
|
|
|
||
| ONO-4641 |
|
|
|
|
|
| Rituximab |
|
|
|
||
| RPC1063 |
|
|
|
||
| RTL1000 |
|
|
|
|
|
| Teriflunomide |
|
|
|
|
|
| Ustekinumab |
|
|
|
|
| Name | Status for MS | Highest status achieved (for any condition) | Other uses | Administration | Negative effects | Commercial |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alemtuzumab |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| BGC20-0134 |
|
|
|
|
||
| BIIB033 |
|
|
|
|
||
| Cladribine |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Cyclophosphamide |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Daclizumab |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Dalfampridine |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Dimethyl fumarate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Estriol |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Fingolimod |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Firategrast |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Flupirtine |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Glatiramer acetate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Interferon beta-1a |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Interferon beta-1b |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Laquinimod |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Masitinib |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Mitoxantrone |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Mycophenolate Mofetil |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Natalizumab |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Ocrelizumab |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Ofatumumab |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ONO-4641 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Rituximab |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| RPC1063 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| RTL1000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Teriflunomide |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Ustekinumab |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Name | Placebo-controlled Trials | Head-to-Head Trials | Other Trials |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alemtuzumab |
Trial name: Comparison of Alemtuzumab and Rebif Efficacy in Multiple Sclerosis I (CARE-MS I) (reported July 2011, publ October 2012) [[784]] [[3822]] Phase: Phase III trial [[784]] [[3822]] Study Design: Industry-sponsored, randomized, multicenter, rater-blinded, controlled trial to compare the effects of two cycles of intravenous alemtuzumab (12 mg per day, once a day for 5 consecutive days at baseline and once a day for 3 days at 12 months) with interferon beta1a (44 mcg given subcutaneously three times a week) on relapse rate and time to 6 month sustained accumulation of disability (coprimary endpoints) [[784]] [[3822]] Disease Stage: Treatment-naïve, early, active RRMS [[784]] [[3822]] Enrollment/Number of Patients: 581 patients who had received no prior MS therapy [[784]] [[3822]] Duration: 2 years [[784]] [[3822]] Status/Outcome: In the group receiving alemtuzumab (376 patients included in the primary analyses), 82 (22%) relapsed, whereas in the group receiving interferon beta-1a (195 patients included in the primary analyses), 75 (40%) relapsed, which corresponds to a 54.9% improvement with alemtuzumab; at 2 years, 78% in the alemtuzumab group were relapse free versus 59% in the interferon beta-1a group; 30 (8%) in the alemtuzumab group displayed sustained accumulation of disability versus 20 (11%) in the interferon beta-1a group [[784]] [[3822]] Trial name: Comparison of Alemtuzumab and Rebif Efficacy in Multiple Sclerosis II (CARE-MS II) (reported November 2011, publ October 2012) [[789]] [[3823]] Phase: Phase III trial [[789]] [[3823]] Study Design: Industry-sponsored, randomized, multicenter, rater-blinded, controlled trial to compare the effects of two cycles of intravenous alemtuzumab [either 24 mg (a dose that was discontinued) or 12 mg per day, once a day for 5 consecutive days at baseline and once a day for 3 days at 12 months] with interferon beta-1a (44 mcg given subcutaneously three times a week) on relapse rate and time to 6 month sustained accumulation of disability (coprimary endpoints) [[789]] [[3823]] Disease Stage: RRMS, relapsed while on prior therapy [[789]] [[3823]] Enrollment/Number of Patients: 840 patients who had experienced relapse while on prior therapy [[789]] [[3823]] Duration: 2 years [[789]] [[3823]] Status/Outcome: In the group receiving alemtuzumab (12 mg dose) (426 patients included in the primary analyses), 147 (35%) relapsed, whereas in the group receiving interferon beta-1a (202 patients included in the primary analyses), 104 (51%) relapsed, which corresponds to a 49.4% improvement with alemtuzumab; at 2 years, 278 (65%) in the alemtuzumab group were relapse free versus 94 (47%) in the interferon beta-1a group; 54 (13%) in the alemtuzumab group displayed sustained accumulation of disability versus 40 (20%) in the interferon beta-1a group [[789]] [[3823]] Trial name: International Campath-1H in Multiple Sclerosis CAMMS223 (publ 2008) [[448]] Phase: Phase II trial [[448]] Study Design: Industry-sponsored, randomized, multicenter, rater-blinded trial to compare the efficacy of an annual infusion of alemtuzumab (12 mg or 24 mg) to thrice-weekly subcutaneous interferon beta-1a (44 micrograms) [[448]] Disease Stage: RRMS [[448]] Enrollment/Number of Patients: 334 (with 333 completing the study) [[448]] Duration: 36 months [[448]] Status/Outcome: Drug was associated with a 71% reduction in the relative risk of sustained disability and a 74% relative reduction in relapse rate (primary endpoints). Drug was also associated with a more marked reduction in lesions (T2-weighted MRI) than interferon beta-1a and an increase in brain volume (compared to a decrease with interferon beta-1a); proportion of patients relapse-free after 3 years on drug was 80%, vs 52% for interferon beta-1a (secondary endpoints) [[448]] |
Trial name: CARE-MS I extension study (conference report, March 2013) [[5365]] Phase: Extension phase of Phase III trial [[784]] [[3822]] [[5365]] Study Design: Company-sponsored extension of a trial comparing alemtuzumab with interferon beta-1a in patients new to treatment [[5365]] Disease Stage: RRMS [[5365]] Enrollment/Number of Patients: >90% of patients in original trial [[5365]] Duration: Results from 1 year extension described in March 2013 [[5365]] Status/Outcome: Among patients who received alemtuzumab in the original 2-year study, 67% remained relapse-free during the extension; the relapse rate for patients receiving alemtuzumab was 0.24 in the first year of the extension; 72.4% of patients had improved or stable disability over 3 years; >80% of patients who received alemtuzumab in the original trial did not receive additional treatment during year 1 of the extension [[5365]] Trial name: CARE-MS II extension study (conference report, March 2013) [[5365]] Phase: Extension phase of Phase III trial [[789]] [[3823]] [[5365]] Study Design: Company-sponsored extension of a trial comparing alemtuzumab with interferon beta-1a in patients who had relapsed on previous therapy [[5365]] Disease Stage: RRMS [[5365]] Enrollment/Number of Patients: >90% of patients in original trial [[5365]] Duration: Results from 1 year extension described in March 2013 [[5365]] Status/Outcome: Among patients who received alemtuzumab in the original 2-year study, 55% remained relapse-free during the extension; the relapse rate for patients receiving alemtuzumab was 0.25 in the first year of the extension; 70.0% of patients had improved or stable disability over 3 years; >80% of patients who received alemtuzumab in the original trial did not receive additional treatment during year 1 of the extension [[5365]] Trial name: Cossburn et al., Neurology, January 2013 study [[4234]] Phase: Observational study [[4234]] Study Design: Study to test whether the observed variation in lymphocyte recovery time after alemtuzumab treatment affects disease activity [[4234]] Disease Stage: RRMS [[4234]] Enrollment/Number of Patients: 56 [[4234]] Duration: 39.5 months (median followup post alemtuzumab treatment) [[4234]] Status/Outcome: CD19+, CD8+, and CD4+ lymphocytes were reconstituted with mean times of 6, 10, and 36 months; whereas CD8+ and CD19+ reconstitution did not vary between patients in remission and those with active disease, CD4+ cells recovered more rapidly, and were present at higher counts at 24 months, in patients with active disease, indicating that differential lymphocyte recovery might serve as a biomarker for relapse [[4234]] Trial name: Fox et al., Eur. J. Neurol., February 2012 study [[4210]] Phase: Open-label study [[4210]] Study Design: Single-arm, open-label study to determine the effectiveness of alemtuzumab in patients with RRMS that is not controlled by interferon therapy (such that patients experienced ≥2 relapses in the previous 2 years); patients received 24 mg of intravenous alemtuzumab per day for 5 days at baseline and for 3 days after 12 months [[4210]] Disease Stage: Treatment-refractory RRMS [[4210]] Enrollment/Number of Patients: 45 [[4210]] Duration: 2 years [[4210]] Status/Outcome: Drug reduced the annualized relapse rate by 94% as compared with pretreatment levels (from 1.6, 2 years before treatment to 0.17, 2 years following treatment); drug also improved or stabilized scores on the Expanded Disability Status Scale in 86% of patients [[4210]] Trial name: CAMMS223 post-hoc and subset analysis (publ 2011) [[448]] [[422]] Phase: Additional data analysis for Phase II study [[422]] Study Design: Post-hoc and subset analysis of a trial comparing the efficacy of an annual infusion of alemtuzumab (12 mg or 24 mg) to thrice-weekly subcutaneous interferon beta-1a (44 micrograms) [[448]] [[422]] Disease Stage: RRMS [[422]] Enrollment/Number of Patients: 334 [[422]] Duration: 2 years [[422]] Status/Outcome: The drug benefited patients equally in all subgroups of CAMMS223 cohort studied, including age, sex, geographical region, MRI-T1 brain volume, MRI-T2 lesion volume, disease duration, number of previous relapses within 2 years, and EDSS [[422]] Trial name: CAMMS223 5-year follow-up (published 2012) [[997]] Phase: Extension of Phase II study [[997]] Study Design: Open-label 2-year extension of a trial comparing the efficacy of an annual infusion of alemtuzumab (12 mg or 24 mg) to thrice-weekly subcutaneous interferon beta-1a (44 micrograms) [[422]][[788]][[997]] Disease Stage: RRMS [[997]] Enrollment/Number of Patients: 198 on alemtuzumab and 47 on interferon beta1-a, out of original 334 randomized [[997]] Duration: Five year follow-up [[997]] Status/Outcome: Alemtuzumab lowered the risk of sustained accumulation of disability by 72% and the rate of relapse by 69% compared with interferon beta-1a over 5 years. The annualized relapse rate during that time was 0.11 for alemtuzumab and 0.35 for interferon beta-1a Among patients taking alemtuzumab, 72% were estimated to be relapse-free after 5 years, compared to 41% on interferon beta-1a. Patients on alemtuzumab had more frequent serious infections, thyroid disorders and immune thrombocytopenia than those treated with interferon beta-1a [[997]] Trial name: Coles et al., Clin. Neurol. Neurosurg., June 2004 trial [[458]] Phase: Observational study [[458]] Study Design: Investigator-led observational study of response to 5 daily doses of 20 mg of alemtuzumab and optional retreatment in 12-18 months in patients with increasing disability [[458]] Disease Stage: SPMS and RRMS [[458]] Enrollment/Number of Patients: 36 (22 women) SPMS; 22 (17 women) RRMS [[458]] Duration: Patients treated between 1991 and 2002; 280 total patient-years [[458]] Status/Outcome: Drug was associated wtih decrease in relapse rate (RRMS, 94%, SPMS, 97%) and lesion formation measured by MRI in both groups; SPMS patients showed accumulating disability, while RRMS patients remained stable, suggesting that suppressing inflammation is only effective early in disease progression [[458]] |
|
| BGC20-0134 |
Trial name: A Study of Orally Administered BGC20-0134 (Structured Lipid) in Patients With Relapsing Remitting Multiple Sclerosis (RRMS) [[791]] Phase: IIa [[791]] Study Design: Company-sponsored, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multi-center, multinational study evaluating the cumulative number of new T1 gadolinium-enhancing lesions (primary endpoint) and safety during treatment Disease Stage: RRMS [[791]] Enrollment/Number of Patients: Estimated enrollment 166 patients [[791]] Duration: 24 weeks double-blind and placebo controlled, followed by 24 weeks open-label extension [[473]] Status/Outcome: Did not meet primary or secondary endpoints [[792]] |
||
| BIIB033 |
Trial name: BIIB033 single ascending dose study in healthy volunteer subjects (completed as of June 2012) [[485]] Phase: Phase I [[485]] Study Design: Randomized, blinded, placebo-controlled, single-ascending dose study to evaluate safety and tolerability (primary outcome measures) and pharmacokinetics, serum antibody levels, and exploratory biomarkers (secondary outcome measures) [[485]] Disease Stage: Healthy individuals [[485]] Enrollment/Number of Patients: 72 [[485]] Duration: Up to 4 months [[485]] Status/Outcome: Completed (as of June 2012) [[485]] Trial name: Safety study of BIIB033 in subjects with multiple sclerosis (completed as of November 2012) [[486]] Phase: Phase I [[486]] Study Design: Randomized, blinded, placebo-controlled, serial-cohort, multiple ascending dose study to determine the safety and tolerability (primary outcomes) and pharmacokinetics and potential biomarkers of activity (secondary outcomes) of two doses of drug (intravenous infusion of 0.3, 1, 3, 10, 30, 60, or 100 mg/kg) administered two weeks apart [[486]] Disease Stage: RRMS or SPMS [[486]] Enrollment/Number of Patients: Approximately 42 [[486]] Duration: 6 months [[486]] Status/Outcome: Completed (as of November 2012) [[486]] |
||
| Cladribine |
Trial name: Phase II Cladribine Add-on to Interferon-beta (IFN-b) Therapy in MS Subjecs With Active Disease (ONWARD) (ongoing as of January 19, 2012) [[800]] Phase: Phase II trial [[800]] Study Design: Company-sponsored, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study to evaluate the safety, tolerability, and effectiveness of oral claribine (up to 4 cycles, of 0.875 mg per kilogram per cycle) when taken in combination with interferon-beta therapy (Rebif, Avonex, or Betaseron), in treating MS [[800]] Disease Stage: RRMS or SPMS [[800]] Enrollment/Number of Patients: 214 [[800]] Duration: 96 weeks [[800]] Status/Outcome: Final data collection for primary outcome measure is September 2011; estimated study completion date is June 2012 [[800]] Trial name: Oral Cladribine in Early Multiple Sclerosis (ORACLE MS) (ongoing as of September 28, 2011) [[795]] Phase: Phase III trial [[795]] Study Design: Company-sponsored, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial to evaluate the safety and efficacy of cladribine (either 1.75 mg or 3.5 mg per kilogram per year, with the dose given once per week for 4 weeks at the beginning of a cycle) on delaying the conversion to MS after CIS (primary outcome) [[795]] Disease Stage: Patients who have sustained their first CIS, who are at at high risk of converting to MS [[795]] Enrollment/Number of Patients: 617 [[795]] Duration: 2 years [[795]] Status/Outcome: Final data collection date for the primary outcome is July 2011; estimated study completion date is July 2013 [[795]] Trial name: Cladribine Tablets Treating Multiple Sclerosis Orally (CLARITY) (publ 2010; additional analyses publ 2011, 2012) [[559]] [[4317]] [[4465]] [[4464]] [[4463]] Phase: Phase III trial [[559]] Study Design: Company-supported, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial to test the effects of oral cladribine (a cumulative dose of either 3.5 mg or 5.25 mg per kilogram of body weight, given in several short courses) on on the rate of relapse at 96 weeks (primary outcome) and several other outcome measures [[559]] Disease Stage: RRMS [[559]] Enrollment/Number of Patients: 1326, with 1184 completing the study [[559]] Duration: 96 weeks [[559]] Status/Outcome: Drug was associated with a reduction in the annualized rate of relapse in both treatment groups [0.14 in the 3.5 mg group (a relative reduction of 57.6%) and 0.15 in the 5.25 mg group (a relative reduction of 54.5%) as compared with 0.33 in the placebo group] and a lower mean number of brain lesions per patient as compared to the placebo; lymphocytopenia and herpes zoster occurred more frequently in patients receiving cladribine than in those receiving placebo [[559]] [[4465]]; post-hoc analysis of data indicated that cladribine increased the proportion of patients with sustained freedom from disease activity (no relapse, no 3-month sustained change in expanded disability status scale score, and no new MRI lesions), such that over 96 weeks, 44% of patients in the 3.5 mg group, 46% in the 5.25 mg group, and 16% in the placebo group were free from disease activity [[4463]]; additional assessment of MRI outcomes showed that, when data were stratified by baseline disease characteristics, active lesion counts were significantly reduced, and the proportions of patients without active lesions were significantly increased, by cladribine [[4317]]; analysis of economic data from this study indicated that cladribine efficacy was associated with reduced need for medical and societal support and less consumption of healthcare resources [[4464]] Trial name: CLARITY Extension Study (ongoing as of January 23, 2012) [[794]] Phase: Phase IIIb trial [[794]] Study Design: Company-sponsored, re-randomized, placebo-controlled, double blind, parallel assignment, multicenter extension trial involving patients from the CLARITY trial, such that patients from the placebo group were re-randomized to receive 3.5 mg cladribine and patients receiving cladribine were re-randomized to receive either 3.5 mg cladribine or placebo [[794]] Disease Stage: RRMS (in original CLARITY trial) [[794]] [[559]] Enrollment/Number of Patients: 883 [[794]] Duration: 2 years [[794]] Status/Outcome: Final data collection date is September 2011 [[794]] |
Trial name: Prospective Observational Long-term Safety Registry of Multiple Sclerosis Patients Who Have Participated in Cladribine Clinical Trials (PREMIERE) (recruiting as of July 22, 2011) [[798]] Phase: Extension trial [[798]] Study Design: Company-sponsored, observational, case-controlled, prospective study, in which patients who have participated in cladribine clinical trials will be followed to determine long-term safety, with the primary outcome an estimate of risk factors and their frequency and the secondary outcomes the occurrence of severe infections, malignancies, deaths, hematological toxicity, pregnancies, and pregnancy outcomes [[798]] Disease Stage: MS patients who have taken oral cladribine in MS clinical studies [[798]] Enrollment/Number of Patients: Estimated 1500 [[798]] Duration: Will last until 2 years of follow-up data are available for 1000 subjects after registry enrollment [[798]] Status/Outcome: Final data collection date for the primary outcome measure is Dec 2018 [[798]] |
|
| Cyclophosphamide |
Trial name: Likosky et al., J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry, December 1991 trial [[932]] Phase: Phase II trial [[932]] Study Design: Hospital-supported, randomized, single-blinded, placebo-controlled trial to study the ability of intensive immunosuppression induced by intravenous cyclophosphamide (400 to 500 mg given 5 days a week until a target leucocyte count was reached) to stabilize progressive MS [[932]] Disease Stage: Chronic progressive MS [[932]] Enrollment/Number of Patients: 42 [[932]] Duration: 2 years [[932]] Status/Outcome: Cyclophosophamide and control were associated with similar disease progression [[932]] Trial name: Canadian Cooperative Multiple Sclerosis Study Group, Lancet, February 1991 trial [[943]] Phase: Phase II trial [[943]] Study Design: Research council supported, randomized, multicenter, placebo-controlled, single-masked trial to test the safety and efficacy of (i) intravenous cyclophosphamide (1 g on alternate days until a target white blood cell count was reached or until 9 g had been given) with oral prednisone, (ii) oral cyclophosphamide (1.5 to 2.0 mg per kg daily) with alternate day prednisone for 22 weeks and weekly plasma exchange for 20 weeks, or (iii) sham plasma exchange and placebo medications; the primary analysis was a comparison of the rates of treatment failure on two consecutive 6 month assessments [[943]] Disease Stage: Progressive MS [[943]] Enrollment/Number of Patients: 168 [[943]] Duration: 3 years [[943]] Status/Outcome: Neither drug regime was associated with a reduction in the rate of treatment failure, which was statistically similar among all groups [[943]] |
Trial name: Efficacy of Cyclophosphamide Versus Methylprednisolone in Patients with Secondary Progressive Multiple Sclerosis (PROMESS) (ongoing as of October 12, 2010) [[926]] Phase: Phase III trial [[926]] Study Design: Hospital- and ministry-sponsored, double-blind, two-arm, multicenter, randomized trial to compare the effectiveness of intravenous cyclophosphamide versus intravenous methylprednisolone (each given every 4 weeks for 1 year and every 8 weeks for 1 year) on the delay to disability deterioration (primary outcome measure) and on the proportion of patients with disability deterioration and number of relapses (secondary outcome measures) [[926]] Disease Stage: Secondary MS [[926]] Enrollment/Number of Patients: 360 (estimated) [[926]] Duration: 2 years [[926]] Status/Outcome: Estimated completion date is July 2011 (final data collection for primary outcome) [[926]] Trial name: Zipoli et al., J. Neurol. Sci., March 2008 study [[4494]] Phase: Open label comparative study [[4494]] Study Design: Study to compare the safety and efficacy of intravenous mitoxantrone (8 mg per square meter monthly for 3 months, then every 3 months to reach a dose of 120 mg per square meter) to that of intravenous cyclophosphamide (700 mg per square meter, monthly for 12 months and then bimonthly for another 24 months) [[4494]] Disease Stage: Active RRMS or SPMS [[4494]] Enrollment/Number of Patients: 153 [[4494]] Duration: Mean followup of 3.6 years [[4494]] Status/Outcome: No significant difference was seen between the time to first relapse in the two groups; time to disease progression was 3.8 years in the mitoxantrone group and 3.6 years in the cyclophosphamide group; discontinuation because of side effects occurred more frequently in the cyclophosphamide group, although both drug regimes were considered tolerable [[4494]] Trial name: Smith et al., Mult. Scler., October 2005 trial [[942]] Phase: Phase II trial [[942]] Study Design: Randomized, single-blind, parallel-group, multicenter trial to test the safety and efficacy of combination therapy, with methylprednisolone (1 g intravenously for 3 days at screening) and interferon beta-1a (30 mcg intramuscularly weekly for 24 months) and either (i) cyclophosphamide (800 mg per m2) and methylprednisolone (1 g intravaneously) or (ii) methylprednisolone once per month for 6 months, with the primary endpoint the change in the mean number of gadolinium-enhanding lesions and a secondary endpoint the time to treatment failure [[942]] Disease Stage: MS patients with active disease when treated with interferon beta [[942]] Enrollment/Number of Patients: 59 [[942]] Duration: 2 years [[942]] Status/Outcome: Cyclophosphamide and methylprednisolone regime was associated with fewer lesions and a lower cumulative rate of treatment failure as compared with the methylprednisolone regime [[942]] Trial name: Hauser et al., N. Engl. J. Med., January 1983 trial [[944]] Phase: Phase II trial [[944]] Study Design: Foundation- and NIH-sponsored, prospective, randomized, three-arm controlled trial to compare the effects of (i) short-term, high-dose intravenous cyclophosphamide (10 to 14 days of 400 to 500 mg per day) plus adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH), (ii) ACTH alone (for 21 days), or (iii) plasma exchange, ACTH (for 21 days), and low-dose oral cyclophosphamide (2 mg per kg per day for 8 weeks) [[944]] Disease Stage: Severe progressive MS [[944]] Enrollment/Number of Patients: 58 [[944]] Duration: 1 year [[944]] Status/Outcome: High-dose cyclophosphamide plus ACTH was the most effective drug combination for halting disease progression; patients in this category were more likely to be improved or stable after 1 year as compared with patients receiving ACTH alone or plasma exchange (80% versus 20% versus 50%); 11 of the 16 patients in the cyclophosphamide-ACTH group who had been improved or stable at 1 year experienced re-progression in the second or third year after treatment [[944]] |
Trial name: DeZern et al., Am. J. Blood Res., January 2013 study [[4740]] Phase: Open label/observational study [[4740]] Study Design: Observational study to determine if repeat treatment with high-dose cyclophosphamide (50 mg per kg, given intravenously over one hour on 4 consecutive days) after initial cyclophosphamide-induced remission (lasting 22 to 108 months) followed by relapse could safely induce remission a second time in severe autoimmune disease [[4740]] Disease Stage: Severe MS, refractory to standard immunomodulatory therapy [[4740]] Enrollment/Number of Patients: 1 (with MS); 7 others with other autoimmune diseases [[4740]] Duration: 67 months followup for the MS patient [[4740]] Status/Outcome: The quality of the second remissions appeared to be equal to or better than the first; the MS patient was in remission 24 months after the first treatment and for at least 33 months after the second [[4740]] Trial name: Harrison et al., Mult. Scler., February 2012 study [[930]] Phase: Retrospective medical record review [[930]] Study Design: Retrospective review of population of MS patients treated with with high-dose cyclophosphamide (200 mg per kg intravenous infusion over 4 days) followed by maintenance with glatiramer acetate to determine if there is a long-term benefit [[930]] Disease Stage: RRMS [[930]] Enrollment/Number of Patients: 32 [[930]] Duration: 14 months (mean post-treatment follow-up) [[930]] Status/Outcome: Drug regime was associated with a reduction in the annualized relapse rate (as compared with the rate 2 years before treatment), disability progression, and the mean number of gadolinium-enhanced lesions [[930]] Trial name: Le Bouc et al., Mult. Scler., January 2012 study [[4493]] Phase: Historical prospective study [[4493]] Study Design: Study to examine cancer incidence after treatment with cyclophosphamide, in which demographic and medical data were collected and cancers were histologically confirmed; the incidence of cancer was compared to that in the general population [[4493]] Disease Stage: Progressive MS [[4493]] Enrollment/Number of Patients: 354 [[4493]] Duration: 5 years median followup time (with a range of 2 to 15 years) after treatment [[4493]] Status/Outcome: Evidence for an increased risk of cancer after cyclophosphamide treatment was not found [[4493]] Trial name: DeZern et al., Medicine (Baltimore), March 2011 study [[951]] Phase: Observational/open-label study [[951]] Study Design: NIH-funded, observational, retrospective study to determine the effects of high-dose intravenous cyclophosphamide (50 mg per kg per day for 4 consecutive days) without stem cell rescue on disease activity, relapse rate, and overall survival in patients who were refractory to standard treatment [[951]] Disease Stage: Active MS [[951]] Enrollment/Number of Patients: 47 (47 patients with MS; 140 total patients, with a variety of severe autoimmune diseases) [[951]] Duration: 50 months (mean follow-up time; range was 1 to 127 months) [[951]] Status/Outcome: Drug was associated with a response in 70.2% of the MS patients of at least 1 point improvement on the Expanded Disability Status Scale, with a median duration of 9 months [[951]] Trial name: Schwartzman et al., CNS Neurosci. Ther., Summer 2009 study [[4490]] Phase: Observational/open-label study [[4490]] Study Design: Study to determine if high dose (immunoablative) cyclophosphamide could stabilize RRMS, SPMS, or PPMS, as determined by monitoring extended disability status scale scores, lesion load, brain volume, and relapse frequency [[4490]] Disease Stage: RRMS (9 patients), SPMS (11 patients), and PPMS (3 patients) [[4490]] Enrollment/Number of Patients: 23 [[4490]] Duration: 3.5 years [[4490]] Status/Outcome: Cyclophosphamide use in RRMS showed effectiveness (4 of the 9 RRMS patients showed no clinical progression up to 3.5 years after treatment and 7 of 9 had reduced flare frequencies), but use was generally not effective in SPMS and failed in 2 PPMS patients [[4490]] Trial name: Makhani et al., Neurology, June 2009 study [[4511]] Phase: Retrospective medical record review [[4511]] Study Design: Review to examine the effects of cyclophosphamide in pediatric MS patients with severe relapses or who are not responsive to conventional therapies; children had received (i) induction therapy only (5 doses given over 8 days, with the dosing determined by white blood cell count); (ii) induction therapy followed by monthly pulse maintenance therapy; or (iii) pulse maintenance therapy alone [[4511]] Disease Stage: RRMS or SPMS [[4511]] Enrollment/Number of Patients: 17 [[4511]] Duration: N/A [[4511]] Status/Outcome: Cyclophosphamide resulted in a reduced relapse rate and disability score stabilization 1 year after treatment began for most patients and was well-tolerated by most, but some side effects occurred (vomiting, transient alopecia, osteoporosis, and amenorrhea) [[4511]] Trial name: Krishnan et al., Arch Neurol., Aug 2008 study [[946]] Phase: Observational/open-label study [[946]] Study Design: University and foundation-supported, open-label study to explore the safety and effectiveness of high-dose (immunoablative) cyclophosphamide (50 mg per kg per day for 4 consecutive days) without subsequent bone marrow transplantation or immunomodulatory therapy unless the patient required rescue therapy, with the primary outcome safety and tolerability and secondary outcome measures a change in gadolinium-enhancing lesions in MRI and a change in disability measures [[946]] Disease Stage: Aggressive RRMS [[946]] Enrollment/Number of Patients: 9 [[946]] Duration: 2 years [[946]] Status/Outcome: Treatment was well-tolerated and was associated with a reduction in disability and in the mean number of gadolinium-enhancing lesions (81.4% reduction), indicating that cyclophosphamide may be an alternative to bone marrow transplantation [[946]] Trial name: La Mantia et al., Cochrane Database Syst. Rev., January 2007 study [[950]] Phase: Retrospective trial review [[950]] Study Design: Systematic review of relevant randomized controlled trials (which involved cyclophosphamide alone or cyclophosphamide with adrenocorticotropic hormone or steroids) to evaluate whether the drug slows MS progression [[950]] Disease Stage: Progressive MS [[950]] Enrollment/Number of Patients: 152 [[950]] Duration: N/A [[950]] Status/Outcome: Drug regimes did not prevent long-term progression of disability [[950]] Trial name: Gladstone et al., Arch. Neurol., October 2006 study [[4569]] Phase: Observational/open-label study [[4569]] Study Design: Study to evaluate the effects of high-dose cyclophosphamide (200 mg per kg over 4 days) in patients with an Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) score ≥3.5 after evaluation of 2 or more approved disease-modifying therapy regimens [[4569]] Disease Stage: Severe refractory MS [[4569]] Enrollment/Number of Patients: 12 [[4569]] Duration: Median followup, 15 months; range, 6 to 24 months [[4569]] Status/Outcome: Treatment was associated with minimal morbidity and improved clinical outcomes, such that the EDSS score never increased by >1.0 and decreased by ≥1.0 in 5 patients; patients described improvement in all quality-of-life issues measured [[4569]] Trial name: Reggio et al., J. Neurol., October 2005 study [[4508]] Phase: Observational/open label study [[4508]] Study Design: Study to determine the effects of cyclophosphamide [given in monthly intravenous pulses (dose ranging from 500 mg to 1500 mg per square meter) to obtain chronic reduction of lymphocytes] in combination with interferon beta-1a or interferon beta-1b for 24 months in patients who had already been treated with interferon beta alone for at least 12 months and had apparently failed to receive benefit, with the primary endpoint the yearly relapse rate [[4508]] Disease Stage: RRMS [[4508]] Enrollment/Number of Patients: 30 patients who experienced failure of interferon beta therapy [[4508]] Duration: 24 months (patients were examined one year before cyclophosphamide began and during the 24 months of combination therapy) [[4508]] Status/Outcome: Cyclophosphamide treatment was associated with a significant improvement in the yearly relapse rate, such that the relapse rate was 1.4 12 months before the combination therapy began, 0.4 at 12 months, and 0.17 at 24 months [[4508]] Trial name: Patti et al., J. Neurol. Sci., December 2004 study [[4489]] Phase: Observational/open-label study [[4489]] Study Design: Study to examine the long-term effects of 18 months of combination therapy [monthly intravenous cyclophosphamide pulses (500 mg to 1500 mg per square meter) for 12 months to obtain lasting reduction of lymphocytes followed by bimonthly cyclophosphamide for 6 months] combined with standard doses of interferon beta-1a or interferon beta-1b, after which interferon beta alone was continued at standard doses [[4489]] Disease Stage: Rapidly transitional MS, refractory to interferon beta therapy [[4489]] Enrollment/Number of Patients: 10 [[4489]] Duration: 4.5 years (18 months of combination therapy plus followup for 36 months) [[4489]] Status/Outcome: The addition of cyclophosphamide significantly reduced the number of relapses, extended disability status scale score, and lesion burden, and these reductions were maintained for 36 months after cyclophosphamide was discontinued [[4489]] Trial name: Zephir et al., J. Neurol. Sci., March 2004 study [[4567]] Phase: Retrospective medical record review [[4567]] Study Design: Cohort study to determine which clinical patterns might predict a good response to monthly cyclophosphamide pulses in patients in whom the Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) score had worsened by ≥1 point in the previous year; the EDSS score was determined at baseline and at 6 months and 12 months of treatment [[4567]] Disease Stage: Progressive MS (SPMS or PPMS) [[4567]] Enrollment/Number of Patients: 490 (data from 490 patients were collected; 476 had been treated for ≥1 year with cyclophosphamide and methylprednisolone) [[4567]] Duration: 1 year of treatment [[4567]] Status/Outcome: Response to treatment did not significantly differ between SPMS and PPMS patients; after 12 months, 78.6% of SPMS and 73.5% of PPMS patients exhibited an improved or stabilized EDSS score [those who improved had a shorter mean progressive time course (5.1 years) than those who remained stable or became worse (7.1 years)] and the treatment was generally well tolerated [[4567]] Trial name: Portaccio et al., Mult. Scler., October 2003 study [[4492]] Phase: Medical record review [[4492]] Study Design: Review to determine the frequency and severity of side effects and drug tolerability in patients who received intravenous cyclophosphamide each month for 12 months (700 mg per square meter of body surface), then once every two months for another 12 months [[4492]] Disease Stage: Progressive or very active MS [[4492]] Enrollment/Number of Patients: 112 [[4492]] Duration: 24 months of active treatment with prospective followup [[4492]] Status/Outcome: 81.8% of patients felt that the treatment regimen was at least relatively tolerable and acceptable, whereas 18% discontinued therapy because of side effects; serious side effects, which were seen in 21.4% of patients, included definitive amenorrhea (33.3% of fertile women), hypogammaglobulinemia (5.4%), hemorrhagic cystitis (4.5%), and malignancies (3.6%, 75% of whom had been previously treated with azathioprine) [[4492]] Trial name: Perini and Gallo, J. Neurol., July 2003 study [[4491]] Phase: Controlled open-label study [[4491]] Study Design: Controlled, open-label study to examine the safety and efficacy of pulse cyclophosphamide therapy, in which patients received high dose (tailored to the white blood cell response and ranging from 800 to 1200 mg per square meter of body surface) intravenous cyclophosphamide every 4 weeks for 1 year and every 8 weeks for an additional year [[4491]] Disease Stage: Very active SPMS [[4491]] Enrollment/Number of Patients: 24, with 16 receiving treatment [[4491]] Duration: 2 years [[4491]] Status/Outcome: Cyclophosphamide was associated with a decrease in the expanded disability status scale score (from a mean of 5.6+/-1.0 at the time the study began to 4.3+/-1.6 at year 1 and 4.1+/-1.6 at year 2) and a decrease in the mean relapse rate (from 3.0+/-1.4 in the 2 years before therapy to 0.25+/-0.45 during therapy) [[4491]] Trial name: Patti et al., J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry, September 2001 study [[4509]] Phase: Observational/open label study [[4509]] Study Design: Study to determine the effects of cyclophosphamide [given in monthly intravenous pulses (dose ranging from 500 mg to 1500 mg per square meter) for 12 months to obtain chronic lymphocytopenia and then given every 60 days for another 6 months] in combination with interferon beta-1a or interferon beta-1b, in patients who were already receiving interferon beta treatment, but who did not benefit from it [[4509]] Disease Stage: Rapidly transitional MS [[4509]] Enrollment/Number of Patients: 10 [[4509]] Duration: 18 months [[4509]] Status/Outcome: The combination of cyclophosphamide and interferon beta was associated with a reduction in the number of relapses, previously accumulated disability, and T2 lesion burden, such that disease progression appeared to be halted [[4509]] Trial name: Khan et al., Mult. Scler., June 2001 study [[4533]] Phase: Observational/open label study [[4533]] Study Design: Study to determine the effects of monthly intravenous cyclophosphamide, given for 6 months, in patients who had undergone severe deterioration during the previous 12 months despite receiving conventional immunomodulating drugs and intravenous methylprednisolone [[4533]] Disease Stage: RRMS [[4533]] Enrollment/Number of Patients: 14 [[4533]] Duration: 18 months [[4533]] Status/Outcome: Patients treated with cyclophosphamide improved and displayed neurological stability within 6 months, and these changes were sustained for at least 18 months after the initiation of cyclophosphamide treatment [[4533]] Trial name: Hohol et al., Mult. Scler., December 1999 study [[4532]] Phase: Observational/open label study [[4532]] Study Design: Study to determine what factors are associated with a response to cyclophosphamide/methylprednisolone therapy (given at 4 to 8 week intervals) [[4532]] Disease Stage: Progressive MS [[4532]] Enrollment/Number of Patients: 95 [[4532]] Duration: 12 months [[4532]] Status/Outcome: The length of time the patient had been in the progressive phase was found to be the most significant variable that correlated with response to the drug regime, such that patients who had improved at 12 months had progressive disease for an average of 2.1 years before therapy, but those whose disease remained stable or became more severe had progressive disease for 5.0 or 4.1 years, respectively; age, gender, age at onset, and age at treatment did not correlate with response [[4532]] Trial name: Gobbini et al., J. Neuroimmunol., September 1999 study [[933]] Phase: Observational/open-label study [[933]] Study Design: Open-label study to determine the effect of intravenous cyclophosphamide (monthly pulses of 1 g per kg2) on disease activity as monitored by MRI [[933]] Disease Stage: RRMS [[933]] Enrollment/Number of Patients: 5 [[933]] Duration: 28 months [[933]] Status/Outcome: Drug was associated with a reduction in the frequency of contrast-enhancing lesions in all patients and a decrease in the T2 lesion load in 3 patients in the first 5 months of therapy [[933]] Trial name: La Mantia et al., Ital. J. Neurol. Sci., February 1998 study [[4568]] Phase: Observational/open-label study [[4568]] Study Design: Study to compare the safety and efficacy of different cyclophosphamide treatment schedules [(i) induction and then bimonthly boosters for 1 year; (ii) bimonthly boosters for 1 year; or (iii) monthly boosters for 1 year] [[4568]] Disease Stage: Progressive MS [[4568]] Enrollment/Number of Patients: 53 [[4568]] Duration: 1 year [[4568]] Status/Outcome: Treatment schedules (i) and (iii) were associated with a higher percentage of stable patients, as shown by survival analysis; side effects included myelotoxicity in group (i) and broncopneumonia in group (ii); response was limited to SPMS patients [[4568]] Trial name: Weiner et al., Neurology, May 1993 trial [[941]] Phase: Phase II trial [[941]] Study Design: Randomized, single-blinded, non-treatment control trial to test whether booster intravenous cyclophosphamide therapy (700 mg per m2 every other month for 2 years or nothing) after induction therapy (2- to 3- week course of intravenous cyclophosphamide plus adrenocorticotropic hormone) affects reprogression, and to test two different cyclophosphamide induction regimens (a fixed dose of cyclophosphamide versus a dose that was adjusted depending on the white blood cell count, as in previous studies) [[928]] [[941]] Disease Stage: Progressive MS [[941]] Enrollment/Number of Patients: 256 [[941]] Duration: 30 months [[941]] Status/Outcome: Booster therapy was associated with slower disease progression at 24 and 30 months and prolonged the time to treatment failure after 1 year (with better response in patients under 40 years of age); the two induction regimes had equivalent effects on initial stabilization and subsequent progression (with 56% of patients stable at 1 year) [[928]] [[941]] Trial name: Lamers et al., J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry, October 1988 study [[945]] Phase: Observational/open-label study [[945]] Study Design: Study to determine the effects of cyclophosphamide (daily dose of 400 mg, for a total dose of 8 g) and prednisone (100 mg) on the levels of myelin basic protein in cerebrospinal fluid [[945]] Disease Stage: Chronic progressive MS [[945]] Enrollment/Number of Patients: 11 [[945]] Duration: 3 to 10 weeks [[945]] Status/Outcome: Drugs were associated with a decrease in the levels of myelin basic protein in cerebrospinal fluid (which are elevated in MS patients as compared with a reference group of patients without MS) [[945]] Trial name: Carter et al., Neurology, July 1988 study [[940]] Phase: Observational/open-label study [[940]] Study Design: Open label, uncontrolled, retrospective study to determine safety, dosage required for efficacy, factors that might predict a response to therapy, and disease course after treatment in patients who had received high-dose intravenous cyclophosphamide and adrenocorticotropic hormone over the previous 6 years [[940]] Disease Stage: Chronic progressive MS [[940]] Enrollment/Number of Patients: 164 [[940]] Duration: 6 years (cumulative experience) [[940]] Status/Outcome: Drug was associated with improved stability among 81% of patients after 1 year, but reprogression later occurred in 69% of patients (with the average time to reprogression 1.5 years); second treatment was given to 58 patients who re-progressed, and 70% of them were improved or stabilized one year after retreatment [[928]] [[940]] Trial name: Gonsette et al., in Progress in Multiple Sclerosis Research, 1980 study [[928]] Phase: Observational/open-label study [[928]] Study Design: Uncontrolled, open label trial to test the effects of immunosuppression induced by intravenous cyclophosphamide [using the same protocol as in [[939]]] [[928]] Disease Stage: RRMS [[928]] Enrollment/Number of Patients: 134 [[928]] Duration: 2 to 10 years [[928]] Status/Outcome: Drug stabilized the annual relapse rate in 76% of patients; in 70% of patients, the annual relapse rate decreased by 75% (as compared to the rate 1 to 2 years before treatment), whereas in 30% of patients, there was no response; effects were most pronounced in patients with the shortest course of disease [[928]] Trial name: Gonsette et al., J. Neurol., February 1977 study [[939]] Phase: Observational/open-label study [[939]] Study Design: Open-label, uncontrolled study to test the safety and efficacy of a single, intensive immunosuppression induced by intravenous cyclophosphamide (1 to 12 g over 2 weeks to reach immunosuppression, maintaining a leukopenia of 2000 and a lymphopenia of 1000 for 2 to 3 weeks) on the annual relapse rate and neurological signs [[928]] [[939]] Disease Stage: RRMS [[928]] [[939]] Enrollment/Number of Patients: 140, with 110 followed for 2 to 6 years [[939]] Duration: 2 to 6 years [[939]] Status/Outcome: Drug decreased the annual relapse rate after 2 years and 4 years (62% of patients were stabilized between the 2 and 4 year marks), but only stabilized 5% of patients after 4 years; drug stabilized and improved neurological signs in 60% of patients [[939]] Trial name: Hommes et al., Clin. Neurol. Neurosurg., 1975 study [[4531]] Phase: Observational/open-label study [[4531]] Study Design: Study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of cyclophosphamide and prednisone treatment (given over 20 days) to induce immunosuppression [[4531]] Disease Stage: Chronic progressive MS [[4531]] Enrollment/Number of Patients: 32 [[4531]] Duration: 33 months [[4531]] Status/Outcome: Most patients improved just after treatment, and in 15 of 25 patients who were scored 6 to 33 months after treatment, the improvement continued [[4531]] Trial name: Girard et al., Presse Med., April 1967 study [[928]] [[938]] Phase: Observational/open-label study [[928]] [[938]] Study Design: Open-label, uncontrolled study to assess safety and efficacy of cyclophosphamide (200 mg per day, given intravenously for 4 to 6 weeks to total 4 to 9 g) [[928]] Disease Stage: Progressive MS [[928]] Enrollment/Number of Patients: 30 [[928]] Duration: 2 years [[928]] Status/Outcome: Drug stabilized or improved symptoms in 50% of the patients [[928]] |
| Daclizumab |
Trial name: Safety and Efficacy Study of Daclizumab HYP to Treat Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis (SELECT) (results reported August 2011, publ 3 April 2013) [[803]] [[5545]] Phase: Phase IIb trial [[803]] Study Design: Company-sponsored, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multinational, multicenter trial to evaluate the efficacy of two doses (150 mg or 300 mg) of daclizumab high-yield process (HYP), given subcutaneously every 4 weeks for 52 weeks, on the annualized relapse rate (primary endpoint) [[803]] [[5545]] Disease Stage: RRMS [[803]] [[5545]] Enrollment/Number of Patients: 621, with over 90% completing the study [[5545]] Duration: 1 year [[803]] [[5545]] Status/Outcome: Compared to placebo, daclizumab HYP was associated with a lower annualized relapse rate (0.21 for the 150 mg dose and 0.23 for the 300 mg dose versus 0.46 for placebo, representing 54% and 50% reductions for the two doses, respectively), and a reduction in cumulative number of gadolinium-enhancing lesions between weeks 8 and 24, a reduction in number of newly enlarging T2 hyperintense lesions at one year, and reduction in proportion of patients who relapsed [[803]] [[5545]]; three cases of autoimmune attacks (hepatic and renal) occurred [[3771]] Trial name: CHOICE trial (Daclizumab in active, relapsing multiple sclerosis) (publ 2010) [[433]] Phase: Phase II trial [[433]] Study Design: Company-sponsored randomized, placebo controlled, multinational, multicenter study to evaluate the efficacy of daclizumab (two doses) combined with interferon beta therapy on number of new or enlarged gadolinium-enhancing lesions (primary endpoint) [[433]] Disease Stage: RRMS patients taking interferon beta [[433]] Enrollment/Number of Patients: 230 patients enrolled; all completed the study [[433]] Duration: 24 weeks [[433]] Status/Outcome: The drug was associated with fewer gadolinium-enhancing lesions at high dose (2mg/kg every 2 weeks) plus interferon beta and at low dose (1mg/kg every 4 weeks) plus interferon beta, compared to placebo and interferon beta [[433]] |
Trial name: DECIDE [[804]] Phase: Phase III trial [[804]] Study Design: Company-sponsored, randomized, double-blind, multinational, multicenter trial comparing efficacy of daclizumab to interferon beta-1a [[804]] Disease Stage: RRMS [[804]] Enrollment/Number of Patients: Expected enrollment, 1500 patients [[804]] Duration: 96 to 144 weeks [[804]] Status/Outcome: Enrollment began May 2011; completion is expected in January 2014 [[804]] |
Trial name: Borges et al., Mult. Scler. Relat. Disord., April 2013 study [[5594]] Phase: Retrospective medical record review [[5594]] Study Design: Analysis of MRI results (a total of 1332 scans from a single center) to determine whether daclizumab reduces the rate of brain atrophy [[5594]] Disease Stage: RRMS [[5594]] Enrollment/Number of Patients: 70 MS cases; 26 were treated with daclizumab and 44 were not treated with this drug [[5594]] Duration: 4.3 years (median treatment time with daclizumab) [[5594]] Status/Outcome: Daclizumab decreased the rate of brain atrophy relative to other disease-modifying therapies, probably because of a reduction in the atrophy rate of gray matter [[5594]] Trial name: Safety and Efficacy Extension Study of Daclizumab High Yield Process (DAC HYP) to Treat Relapsing Remitting Multiple Sclerosis (SELECTION) (meeting report, 15 October 2012) [[3771]] [[5777]] Phase: Extension of Phase IIb trial (SELECT) [[5545]] [[5777]] Study Design: Company-sponsored, multicenter, open-label extension study to examine the safety and efficacy of continued treatment with daclizumab high-yield process (HYP), given subcutaneously every 4 weeks, such that patients originally given placebo were re-randomized to either the 150 mg or the 300 mg dose and patients originally given daclizumab HYP were re-randomized to either continue the same dose or to undergo a 24-week washout, after which the original dose was continued for 24 weeks; another primary aim was to monitor the long-term immunogenicity of the drug [[3771]] [[5777]] Disease Stage: RRMS [[3771]] Enrollment/Number of Patients: 517, with 92% participating for the full year [[3771]] Duration: 1 year [[3771]] Status/Outcome: In patients who originally received placebo, the mean annualized relapse rate fell from 0.434 to 0.179 (59% reduction) after they switched to drug treatment and in patients who continuously received treatment, the reduced annualized relapse rates were maintained (meeting report, 15 October 2012) [[3771]]; estimated completion date, September 2015 [[5777]] Trial name: Bielekova et al., Arch Neurol., April 2009 study [[444]] Phase: Phase II study [[444]] Study Design: Investigator-led, open-label, single-center study to determine whether daclizumab efficacy (measured as the reduction of contrast-enhancing lesions; primary endpoint) was dependent on combination with interferon beta or dose [[444]] Disease Stage: RRMS and SPMS [[444]] Enrollment/Number of Patients: 12 RRMS and 3 SPMS patients enrolled; 13 completed the study [[444]] Duration: 3 months interferon beta alone, 5.5 months interferon beta plus daclizumab, then 10 months daclizumab alone [[444]] Status/Outcome: Daclizumab monotherapy was associated with a stabilization of MRI disease activity in 9 of 13 patients, with four requiring additional interferon treatment [[444]] Trial name: Rose et al., Neurol., August 2007 study [[451]] Phase: Phase II study [[451]] Study Design: Investigator-led, open-label, single-center study to evaluate the effect of daclizumab on lesion size (primary endpoint) [[451]] Disease Stage: RRMS patients treated with interferon but with continuing relapses [[451]] Enrollment/Number of Patients: 9 patients enrolled in and completed study [[451]] Duration: 27.5 months [[451]] Status/Outcome: Drug was associated with a reduction in contrast enhancing lesions and improved clinical scores that were not controlled by interferon [[451]] |
| Dalfampridine |
Trial name: Horton et al., Neurology, April 2013 study [[5770]] Phase: Phase II trial [[5770]] Study Design: Randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, crossover trial to study the effect of 4-aminopyridine on vision in MS patients with demyelinating optic neuropathy; patients received either placebo or drug for 5 weeks and then crossed to the other treatment for 5 weeks [[5770]] Disease Stage: MS patients with optic neuropathy [[5770]] Enrollment/Number of Patients: Not stated in abstract [[5770]] Duration: 10 weeks [[5770]] Status/Outcome: 4-Aminopyridine improved visual acuity in a subset of patients; the highest response rates occurred in eyes with a retinal nerve fiber layer that measured between 60 and 80 microns [[5770]] Trial name: Goodman et al., Ann. Neurol., Oct 2010 trial [[347]] Phase: Phase III trial [[347]] Study Design: Randomized, 39-center, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial to test the effects of oral dalfampridine (10 mg twice daily) on walking ability, as measured by a timed 25-foot walk (primary outcome, percentage of timed walk responders) [[347]] Disease Stage: Any stage of MS [[347]] Enrollment/Number of Patients: 239, with 237 in final analysis [[347]] Duration: 9 weeks [[347]] Status/Outcome: Drug improved walking ability in some MS patients (42.9% timed walk responders with drug versus 9.3% with placebo), such that the effect is continued between doses and the average improvement in speed among responders was 24.7% [[347]] Trial name: Goodman et al., Lancet, Feb 2009 trial [[367]] Phase: Phase III trial [[367]] Study Design: Randomized, multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial to test the effects of sustained-release oral fampridine (10 mg twice daily) on walking ability, as measured by a timed 25-foot walk (primary outcome, percentage of timed walk responders) [[367]] Disease Stage: Any stage of MS [[367]] Enrollment/Number of Patients: 301, with efficacy analyses based on 296 [[367]] Duration: 14 weeks [[367]] Status/Outcome: Drug improved walking ability (25.2% increase in speed versus 4.7% with placebo) in some MS patients (35% versus 8% for placebo) [[367]] Trial name: Goodman et al., Neurology, Oct 2008 trial [[374]] Phase: Phase II trial [[374]] Study Design: Multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group trial to test the effects of fampridine (10, 15, or 20 mg twice daily) on walking speed (primary efficacy variable, percent change in speed in a timed 25-foot walk) [[374]]
Disease Stage: People with MS [[374]] Enrollment/Number of Patients: 206 [[374]] Duration: 2 weeks of placebo for all participants, followed by 15 weeks of drug or placebo [[374]] Status/Outcome: Drug was associated with a non-significant trend toward increased walking speed in prospective analysis, but in post hoc analysis, subsets of patients in each dose group consistently showed increased walking speeds during the treatment versus the nontreatment period (36.7% were consistent responders in treatment groups versus 8.5% in placebo group) [[374]] |
Trial name: Two-year safety data for AMPYRA® (press release, 10 October 2012) [[3587]] Phase: Post-marketing [[3587]] Study Design: Safety data from MS patients taking AMPYRA [extended release tablets (10 mg)] during the two years it has been available in the US were analyzed, such that all adverse events reported to Acorda and the US Food and Drug Administration from March 2012 through March 2012 were examined [[3587]] Disease Stage: MS [[3587]] Enrollment/Number of Patients: >62,400 [[3587]] Duration: 2 years [[3587]] Status/Outcome: Safety profile is consistent with that observed in clinical trials; specifically, 160 seizures (4.6 per 1000 patient-years of use) were reported, which is comparable to the seizure rate in the general MS population [[3587]] Trial name: Postmarketing commitment study exploring 5 mg dose of extended release dalfampridine (press release, 13 August 2012) [[3018]] Phase: Postmarketing study required by the US Food and Drug Administration [[3019]] Study Design: Company-sponsored, randomized, placebo-controlled trial to compare the effects of 5 mg and 10 mg (the currently marketed dose) of extended release dalfampridine, twice daily, on the change in walking speed on a timed 25-foot walk test (primary outcome measure) [[3018]] Disease Stage: MS [[3018]] Enrollment/Number of Patients: 430 [[3018]] Duration: 4 weeks [[3018]] Status/Outcome: Neither the 10 mg nor the 5 mg dose met the primary endpoint; however, Accorda Therapeutics reported that when different analyses, similar to those used in the pivotal studies that led to the approval of Ampyra, were performed, the 10 mg dose improved walking speed as compared to placebo (0.443 versus 0.303 feet per second) but the 5 mg dose did not (0.366 versus 0.303 feet per second) [[3018]] [[3019]] Trial name: Fampridine - Benefit assesment according to § 35a Social Code Book V (2012) [[3015]] Phase: Retrospective review [[3015]] [[3016]] Study Design: German Institute for Quality and Efficiency in Health Care (IQWiG) assessed the added benefit of fampridine for adult MS patients with a higher grade walking disability (grades 4 to 7 on the Expanded Disability Status Scale) [[3015]] [[3016]] Disease Stage: MS [[3015]] [[3016]] Enrollment/Number of Patients: N/A [[3015]] [[3016]] Duration: N/A [[3015]] [[3016]] Status/Outcome: Because (i) there are no studies that directly compare fampridine with physiotherapy, which was previously specified as the appropriate comparator therapy; (ii) the specific methodological conditions for indirect comparisons were not met; and (iii) the physiotherapy studies included patients with lower grade walking disability, the IQWiG determined that there is no proof of fampridine conferring an added benefit [[3015]] [[3016]] |
|
| Dimethyl fumarate |
Trial name: COmparator and aN oral Fumarate In RRMS (CONFIRM) (publ September 2012, press releases April 2012 and October 2012, meeting report March 2013) [[1793]] [[3222]] [[3590]] [[5513]] Phase: Phase III trial [[1793]] [[3222]] Study Design: Company-sponsored, global, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, dose-comparison study to determine the safety and efficacy of oral BG-12 (240 mg given either twice a day or three times a day) or glatiramer acetate (20 mg subcutaneous injection each day) in reducing the annualized relapse rate (ARR) (primary endpoint) and the proportion of patients who relapse at two years and the number of T2-hyperintense lesions (secondary endpoints); study was not designed to test whether BG-12 is superior or noninferior to glatiramer acetate [[1793]] [[3222]] Disease Stage: RRMS [[1793]] [[3222]] Enrollment/Number of Patients: 1430 [[1793]] [[3222]] Duration: 2 years [[1793]] [[3222]] Status/Outcome: BG-12 reduced the ARR by 44% (twice a day dose; ARR=0.22) or 51% (three times a day dose; ARR=0.20) and glatiramer acetate reduced this rate by 29% (ARR=0.29) as compared to placebo (ARR=0.40); BG-12 reduced the proportion of patients who relapsed at two years by 34% (twice a day dose) or 45% (three times a day dose) and glatiramer acetate reduced this rate by 29% as compared to placebo; BG-12 also had a significant effect on brain lesions [[1793]] [[3222]]; pooled analysis from >2,300 patients in the CONFIRM and DEFINE studies indicated that both doses decreased the ARR by 49%; the drug decreased the proportion of patients who relapsed by 43% (twice a day dose) and 47% (three times a day dose) and reduced the risk of 12-week confirmed disability progression by 32% (twice a day dose) and 30% (three times a day dose) (press release, 12 October 2012) [[3590]]; secondary analysis showed that the twice a day dose led to a reduction in relapse rate within 10 weeks [[5513]] Trial name: Determination of the Efficacy and safety of oral Fumarate IN rElapsing-remitting MS (DEFINE) (publ September 2012, press releases October 2011 and October 2012, meeting report March 2013) [[583]] [[3221]] [[3590]] [[5513]] Phase: Phase III trial [[583]] [[3221]] Study Design: Global, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, dose-comparison trial to determine the safety and efficacy of BG-12 (240 mg, 2 or 3 times per day) at reducing the proportion of relapsing patients at two years (primary endpoint) and at reducing the annualized relapse rate (ARR), the risk of disability progression, and the number of lesions as measured by brain MRI (secondary endpoints) [[583]] [[3221]] Disease Stage: RRMS [[583]] [[3221]] Enrollment/Number of Patients: 1237, with 952 completing the study [[583]] [[3221]] Duration: 2 years [[583]] [[3221]] Status/Outcome: Drug reduced the risk of relapse by 49% (2 times per day dose; 27% of these patients, versus 46% in the placebo group, had at least one relapse by 2 years) or 50% (3 times per day; 26% had at least one relapse by 2 years), the ARR by 53% (2 times a day; ARR=0.17 versus 0.36 for the placebo group) or 48% (3 times per day; ARR=0.19), and the risk of disability progression by 38% (2 times per day) or 34% (3 times per day), as well as reducing the mean number of several types of brain lesions [[583]] [[3221]]; pooled analysis from >2,300 patients in the CONFIRM and DEFINE studies indicated that both doses decreased the ARR by 49%; the drug decreased the proportion of patients who relapsed by 43% (twice a day dose) and 47% (three times a day dose) and reduced the risk of 12-week confirmed disability progression by 32% (twice a day dose) and 30% (three times a day dose) (press release, 12 October 2012) [[3590]]; secondary analysis showed that the twice a day dose led to a reduction in relapse rate within 10 weeks [[5513]] Trial name: Kappos et al., Lancet, Oct 2008 trial [[370]] Phase: Phase IIb trial [[370]] Study Design: Multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial to evaluate the safety and efficacy of BG00012 (120 mg, 1 time per day; 120 mg, 3 times per day; or 240 mg, 3 times per day) at reducing the number of new gadolinium enhancing lesions (primary endpoint) and at reducing other types of brain lesions and the annualized relapse rate (secondary endpoints) [[370]] Disease Stage: RRMS [[370]] Enrollment/Number of Patients: 257 [[370]] Duration: 24 weeks, with a 24 week extension period [[370]] Status/Outcome: 240 mg drug (3 times a day) reduced the mean total number of new gadolinium enhancing lesions by 69% from week 12 to 24 as compared to placebo and reduced the annualized relapse rate by 32% [[370]]; additional analysis showed that the 240 mg, 3 times a day dose reduced the number of new gadolinium-enhanced lesions in a range of patient subgroups (which were based on demographics and baseline disease characteristics), and the reduction varied depending on the subgroup [[2193]] Trial name: Schimrigk et al., Eur. J. Neurol., Jun 2006 trial [[385]] Phase: Pilot study [[385]] Study Design: Exploratory, prospective, baseline-controlled, open-label study to examine the effects of Fumaderm (which contains dimethyl fumarate and and salts of monoethylfumarate) [6 weeks baseline, 18 weeks treatment (target dose of 720 mg per day), 4 weeks washout, 48 weeks treatment (target dose of 360 mg per day)] on number and volume of gadolinium enhancing lesions (primary outcome) [[385]] Disease Stage: RRMS [[385]] Enrollment/Number of Patients: 10, with 3 withdrawing [[385]] Duration: 76 weeks [[385]] Status/Outcome: Drug was associated with reductions from baseline in the number and volume of gadolinium enhancing lesions [[385]] |
Trial name: ENDORSE (press release, 12 October 2012) [[3590]] Phase: Phase III extension study [[3590]] Study Design: Industry-sponsored, dose-blind, multicenter extension study to evaluate the long-term safety and efficacy of dimethyl fumarate (240 mg, two times a day or three times a day); patients from the 2-year DEFINE or CONFIRM trials who had received dimethyl fumarate continued on the same dose, whereas those who had received placebo or glatiramer acetate (CONFIRM trial) were randomized to the twice a day or three times a day dimethyl fumarate doses [[3590]] Disease Stage: RRMS [[3590]] Enrollment/Number of Patients: 1736 [[3590]] Duration: >1 year [[3590]] Status/Outcome: Overall safety profile was similar to those from the DEFINE and CONFIRM trials as of October 2012 [[3590]] |
|
| Estriol |
Trial name: Estriol Treatment in Multiple Sclerosis: Effect on Cognition [[865]] [[867]] Phase: Phase II [[867]] Study Design: Company-sponsored, randomized, double-blind placebo-controlled, single-site, parallel-assignment study examining efficacy of estriol on cognitive function as assessed by Paced Serial Addition Test (primary endpoint) [[867]] Disease Stage: RRMS and SPMS [[867]] Enrollment/Number of Patients: Expected enrollment 64 female patients [[867]] Duration: 1 year [[867]] Status/Outcome: Expected completion date April 2013 [[867]] Trial name: A combination trial of Copaxone plus Estriol in Relapsing Remitting Multiple Sclerosis [[864]] [[868]] Phase: Phase II [[868]] Study Design: Company-sponsored, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multi-center, US-based trial comparing relapse rate (primary endpoint) of estriol and Copaxone (glatiramer acetate) to Copaxone alone [[868]] Disease Stage: RRMS [[868]] Enrollment/Number of Patients: Enrolled 150 patients [[864]] [[868]] Duration: 2 years [[868]] Status/Outcome: Expected completion date September 2013 [[868]] |
Trial name: Sicotte et al., Ann Neurol, October 2002 trial [[461]] Phase: Pilot study [[461]] Study Design: Investigator-run crossover study evaluating efficacy of pregnancy-level doses of estriol in controlling MS lesions [[461]] Disease Stage: RRMS and SPMS [[461]] Enrollment/Number of Patients: 12 female patients – 6 with RRMS and 6 with PPMS enrolled; 10 completed study [[461]] Duration: 22 months [[461]] Status/Outcome: No effect in SPMS patients [[461]] ; Lesion number and volume decreased significantly in RRMS group, and returned to pre-treatment levels after treatment ended [[461]]; Significantly increased cognitive function in the RRMS group [[461]] ; Further analysis showed increased levels of interleukin 5 and interleukin 10 and decreased levels of tumor necrosis factor alpha in stimulated peripheral blood mononuclear cells isolated during treatment [[460]] Trial name: PRIMS (Pregnancy in Multiple Sclerosis Study) [[464]] Phase: Not applicable [[464]] Study Design: Multicenter, prospective, observational European study to determine the effects of pregnancy, postpartum state, breast-feeding, and epidural analgesia on rate of relapse [[464]] Disease Stage: Any [[464]] Enrollment/Number of Patients: 254 pregnant women diagnosed with MS before pregnancy [[464]] Status/Outcome: Rate of relapse declined by nearly 80% during pregnancy and increased during three months post-partum, returning to pre-pregnancy levels [[464]] |
|
| Fingolimod |
Trial name: Efficacy and Safety of Fingolimod (FTY720) in Patients With Relapsing-remitting Multiple Sclerosis (FREEDOMS II) (press release, 12 October 2012; conference report, March 2013) [[3592]] [[3591]] [[5361]] Phase: Phase III trial [[3592]] [[3591]] Study Design: Industry-sponsored, double-blind, randomized, multicenter, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study to compare the efficacy and safety of fingolimod at two doses (0.5 mg or 1.25 mg oral dose, once per day), with the primary outcome measure the aggregate annualized relapse rate (ARR) up to month 24 [[3592]] [[3591]] Disease Stage: RRMS [[3592]] [[3591]] Enrollment/Number of Patients: 1083 [[3592]] Duration: 24 months [[3591]] Status/Outcome: Drug was associated with an aggregate ARR estimate up to month 24 of 0.203 (1.25 mg dose) or 0.208 (0.5 mg dose) versus 0.403 for placebo [[3591]]; post hoc analysis indicated that the 0.5 dose resulted in significant relapse-related benefits within the first three months and brain volume-related benefits by six months [mean percent volume change of -0.23 (fingolimod) versus -0.38 (placebo) at six months] [[3592]]; over 2 years, fingolimod decreased the rate of brain volume loss by 33% as compared to placebo [[5361]]; fingolimod-associated reductions in ARR occurred across baseline disease activity, previous treatment, age, and gender [[5361]] Trial name: FTY720 in Patients With Primary Progressive Multiple Sclerosis (INFORMS) (active as of Aug 2011) [[471]] Phase: Phase III trial [[471]] Study Design: Double-blind, randomized, multicenter, placebo-controlled, parallel-group trial to evaluate the effect of FTY720 (0.5 mg daily) on delaying time to sustained disability progression (primary endpoint) [[471]] Disease Stage: PPMS [[471]] Enrollment/Number of Patients: 951 (estimated) [[471]] Duration: 36 months [[471]] Status/Outcome: Final data collection date (primary outcome measure) is Aug 2014 [[471]] Trial name: FTY720 Research Evaluating Effects of Daily Oral therapy in Multiple Sclerosis (FREEDOMS) (publ 2010; additional analyses publ 2012; conference report, March 2013) [[303]] [[2331]] [[3592]] [[5361]] Phase: Phase III trial [[303]] Study Design: Industry-supported, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter, multinational trial to test the effects of daily oral fingolimod (0.5 mg or 1.25 mg dose) on the annualized relapse rate (primary endpoint) and the time to disability progression and the number of gadolinium-enhancing lesions (secondary endpoints) [[303]]; MRI scans were obtained at 0, 6, 12, and 24 months [[2331]] Disease Stage: RRMS [[303]] Enrollment/Number of Patients: 1272 (with 1033 completing study) [[303]] Duration: 24 months [[303]] Status/Outcome: Drug caused a relative reduction in the annualized relapse rate of 54% (daily oral 0.5 mg dose) or 60% (1.25 mg dose), an increase in the time to disability, and a reduction in the number of gadolinium-enhancing lesions; drug was also associated with less reduction in brain volume [[303]]; both doses reduced inflammatory lesions (gadolinium-enhancing and new/newly enlarged T2 lesions) in a rapid and sustained manner and slowed the rate of brain volume loss [[2331]]; post hoc analysis indicated that the 0.5 dose resulted in significant relapse-related benefits within the first three months and brain volume-related benefits by six months [mean percent volume change of -0.22 (fingolimod) versus -0.34 (placebo) at six months] [[3592]]; over 2 years, fingolimod decreased the rate of brain volume loss by 35% as compared to placebo [[5361]] Trial name: Efficacy and Safety of FTY720 in Patients With Relapsing Multiple Sclerosis (publ 2006) [[478]] Phase: Phase II trial [[304]] Study Design: Double-blind placebo-controlled, proof-of-concept trial to test the effects of daily oral fingolimod (0.5 mg or 1.25 mg dose) on the number of gadolinium-enhanced lesions [[304]] Disease Stage: RRMS [[304]] Enrollment/Number of Patients: 281 (with 255 completing core study and 227 completing extension study) [[304]] Duration: 6-month core study and 6-month extension study [[304]] Status/Outcome: Drug caused a reduction in the number of gadolinium-enhanced lesions [[304]] Trial name: Kahan <em>et al., N. Engl. J. Med.</em>, Oct 2003 trial [[304]] Phase: Phase I trial [[304]] Study Design: Randomized, multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial to examine safety, pharmacodynamics, and pharmacokinetics of daily oral dose (0.125, 0.25, 0.5, 1.0, 2.5, or 5.0 mg) [[330]] Disease Stage: Not MS; stable renal transplant patients [[330]] Enrollment/Number of Patients: 65 [[330]] Duration: 28 days [[330]] Status/Outcome: Drug doses greater or equal to 1.0 mg caused a reversible reduction in the number of peripheral blood lymphocytes, with no major increase in adverse events [[330]]
|
Trial name: Trial Assessing Injectable Interferon versus FTY720 Oral in Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis (TRANSFORMS) (publ 2010, conference report March 2013, additional analyses publ April 2013) [[302]] [[5361]] [[5862]] Phase: Phase III trial [[302]] Study Design: Multicenter, randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, parallel group trial to compare the efficacy of a daily oral dose of fingolimod (1.25 mg or 0.5 mg) versus a weekly intramuscular dose of interferon beta-1a (30 micrograms) [[302]] Disease Stage: RRMS [[302]] Enrollment/Number of Patients: 1292 (with 1153 completing study) [[302]] Duration: 12 months [[302]] Status/Outcome: Fingolimod was associated with a lower annualized relapse rate (ARR) than interferon beta-1a [0.20 (1.25 mg dose) or 0.16 (0.5 mg dose) for fingolimod versus 0.33 for interferon beta-1a] and with significantly fewer lesions in MRI scans at 12 months than interferon beta-1a, whereas no differences in time to confirmed progression of disability were seen [[302]]; over 1 year, fingolimod decreased the rate of brain volume loss by -32% as compared to interferon beta-1a [[5361]]; when specific subgroups (defined on the basis of demographics, baseline disease characteristics, and previous responses to therapy) were analyzed, fingolimod reduced the ARR over 1 year by 32 to 59% relative to interferon beta-1a in all subgroups based on demographics or baseline disease characteristics; in patients with high levels of disease activity during interferon beta treatment in the previous year (before the study), fingolimod reduced the ARR by 61% as compared to interferon beta-1a [[5862]]
|
Trial name: FREEDOMS II extension study (conference report, March 2013) [[5361]] Phase: Extension of Phase III trial [[3591]] [[5361]] Study Design: Company-sponsored extension study to examine efficacy and safety of fingolimod [[5361]] Disease Stage: Relapsing MS [[5361]] Enrollment/Number of Patients: 632 [[5361]] Duration: Up to 4 years [[5361]] Status/Outcome: 83% of patients completed the extension study, which did not reveal unexpected safety concerns [[5361]] Trial name: Brandes et al., J. Med. Econ., February 2013 study [[4902]] Phase: Observational study [[4902]] Study Design: Analysis to assess the effect of real-world adherence (estimated from a study of a single claims database of a national pharmacy benefit manager) on the cost-effectiveness (the cost per avoided relapse) of fingolimod, subcutaneous interferon beta-1b (Extavia or Betaseron) and interferon beta-1a, glatiramer acetate, and intramuscular interferon beta-1a [[4902]] Disease Stage: MS [[4902]] Enrollment/Number of Patients: N/A [[4902]] Duration: N/A [[4902]] Status/Outcome: Costs per relapse avoided were estimated at $90,566 (fingolimod), $127,024 (Extavia), $137,492 (Betaseron), $144,016 (subcutaneous inferferon beta-1a), $160,314 (glatiramer acetate), and $312,629 (intramuscular interferon beta-1a) [[4902]] Trial name: Sempere et al., Acta Neurol. Scand., January 2013 trial [[4662]] Phase: Observational/open-label study [[4662]] Study Design: Observational study to examine the effects of switching from natalizumab (after treatment of more than 1 year) to fingolimod in JC virus-positive patients; after natalizumab withdrawal, patients received methylprednisolone for 3 months followed by oral fingolimod (0.5 mg) daily [[4662]] Disease Stage: RRMS [[4662]] Enrollment/Number of Patients: 8 JC virus-positive patients who switched drugs and 9 JC virus-negative patients who did not switch [[4662]] Duration: Patients received fingolimod for 4 to 12 months (mean, 9 months); patients who continued receiving natalizumab had a mean followup time of 13 months [[4662]] Status/Outcome: Disease reactivation occurred in patients who switched drugs, with 63% having clinical relapses and 75% showing MRI activity, whereas neither activity was observed in patients who remained on natalizumab [[4662]] Trial name: Havla et al., J. Neurol., December 2012 study [[4336]] Phase: Observational study [[4336]] Study Design: Study to examine the effect of switching to fingolimod, within 24 weeks, on patients who had discontinued natalizumab (which often leads to recurrence of MS symptoms) [[4336]] Disease Stage: RRMS [[4336]] Enrollment/Number of Patients: 36; 26 switched to fingolimod and 10 did not receive any disease-modifying therapy [[4336]] Duration: 55.1 weeks mean follow-up post natalizumab discontinuation [[4336]] Status/Outcome: Initiation of fingolimod after discontinuation of natalizumab was associated with a reduction in disease activity recurrence, such that 42% (11 patients) in the fingolimod group had one or more relapses during followup, as compared to 70% (7 patients) in the therapy-free group; starting fingolimod earlier tended to reduce the annual relapse rate [[4336]] Trial name: Rinaldi et al., Mult. Scler., November 2012 study [[3731]] Phase: Observational study [[3731]] Study Design: Study to determine the efficacy of switching patients (with JC virus antibodies) from natalizumab to fingolimod after a 3-month washout period [[3731]] Disease Stage: RRMS [[3731]] Enrollment/Number of Patients: 22 [[3731]] Duration: 9 months (mean follow-up period) [[3731]] Status/Outcome: 50% of patients experienced disease reactivation (6 patients experienced clinical relapses and 5 displayed MRI activity); thus, fingolimod does not appear to act quickly enough to prevent MS reactivation after termination of natalizumab treatment [[3731]] Trial name: TRANSFORMS extension study (press release, June 2012) [[2105]] Phase: Phase III trial [[2105]] Study Design: Company-sponsored, open-label extension trial to study the efficacy and safety of fingolimod versus interferon beta-1a; patients who received fingolimod (0.5 mg, once daily oral dose) during the original study continued receiving this drug and patients who had originally received interferon beta-1a switched to fingolimod [[2105]] Disease Stage: RRMS [[2105]] Enrollment/Number of Patients: 356 patients received continuous treatment with fingolimod in the original trial and extension; 167 patients switched to fingolimod during the extension [[2105]] Duration: Up to 3.5 years extending beyond the original 12 month study [[2105]] Status/Outcome: Among patients who received fingolimod during the original trial and the extension, the annualized relapse rate remained steady (0.16); among patients who switched to fingolimod during the extension, the annualized relapse rate decreased from 0.33 (core study, treated with interferon beta-1a) to 0.20 (extension); fingolimod was generally well tolerated [[2105]] Trial name: Roskell et al., Curr. Med. Res. Opin., May 2012 study [[3359]] Phase: Retrospective trial review [[3359]] Study Design: Meta-analysis of placebo-controlled and head-to-head trials, which evaluated the effects of one or more drugs (fingolimod, interferon beta-1a, interferon beta-1b, and/or glatiramer acetate), to compare the effects of fingolimod versus the other treatments on the annualized relapse rate (ARR) [[3359]] Disease Stage: RRMS [[3359]] Enrollment/Number of Patients: N/A [[3359]] Duration: N/A [[3359]] Status/Outcome: Meta-analyses indicated that fingolimod significantly reduced the ARR as compared to the other drugs; the relative ARRs for each drug versus fingolimod were 1.43 (glatiramer acetate, 20 mg dose), 1.51 (interferon beta-1b, 250 microg dose), 1.55 (interferon beta-1a, 44 microg dose), 1.67 (interferon beta-1a, 22 microg dose), 1.93 (interferon beta-1a, 30 microg dose), and 2.32 (placebo) [[3359]] Trial name: FREEDOMS extension study (press release, April 2012) [[1794]] Phase: Phase III trial [[1794]] Study Design: Company-sponsored, open-label trial to study the safety and efficacy of fingolimod [[1794]] Disease Stage: RRMS [[1794]] Enrollment/Number of Patients: 1033 completed the original FREEDOMS study; 90% completed 3 years of additional observation and 45% completed 4 years [[1794]] Duration: 4 years [[1794]] Status/Outcome: Drug was associated with a 55% decrease in the annualized relapse rate in patients who switched from placebo (taken during the original FREEDOMS trial) to drug (during the extension); patients who received continuous drug treatment (during the original trial and the extension) were more likely to remain relapse free than those who received placebo during the original trial (59% versus 37%) [[1794]] Trial name: Del Santo et al., Eur. J. Clin. Pharmacol., April 2012 study [[2482]] Phase: Retrospective trial review [[2482]] Study Design: Review of 10 randomized trials that tested interferon, glatiramer acetate, natalizumab, or fingolimod in RRMS, such that the relapse-free rates at 12 months were compared, either directly or through network meta-analysis [[2482]] Disease Stage: RRMS [[2482]] Enrollment/Number of Patients: N/A [[2482]] Duration: N/A [[2482]] Status/Outcome: Fingolimod was determined to have the most favorable profile with respect to relapse-free rate at the follow-up assessment at 1 year [[2482]] |
| Firategrast |
Trial name: Miller et al., Lancet Neurol 2012 trial [[1338]] Phase: Phase II [[1338]] Study Design: Company-sponsored, multicenter, multinational, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled dose-ranging study examining efficacy at four doses (150mg, 600mg, 900mg, 1200mg) as measured by cumulative number of new gadolinium-enhancing lesions (primary endpoint) [[1338]] Disease Stage: RRMS [[1338]] Enrollment/Number of Patients: 343 patients with RRMS who had not previously received immunosuppressant or immunomodulatory therapies enrolled; 286 completed trial [[1338]] Duration: 24 weeks treatment and 12 weeks core follow-up, plus 12 months extended follow-up [[1338]] Status/Outcome: Reduction in lesion number (49%; 2.69, compared to 5.31 with placebo) in patients given 900mg and 1200mg drug; no effect at lower doses [[1338]] |
||
| Flupirtine |
Trial name: Flupirtine as Oral Treatment in Multiple Sclerosis (FLORIMS) [[1500]] Phase: Phase II [[1500]] Study Design: Investigator-run, multicenter, double-blind, randomized, placebo controlled pilot study assessing effect of flupirtine, added to interferon beta therapy, on neurodegeneration (primary endpoint: cumulative number of new T2 hypertensive lesions with MRI) [[1500]] Disease Stage: RRMS [[1500]] Enrollment/Number of Patients: Estimated enrollment 80 patients [[1500]] Duration: 12 months [[1500]] Status/Outcome: Results expected in early 2013 (Jan Dorr, personal communication, February 13, 2012) |
Trial name: Effect of the Kv7-channel Opener Flupirtine on the Excitability of Human Peripheral Myelinated Axons in Vivo [[1501]] Phase: Phase I [[1501]] Study Design: Investigator-run, randomized, double-blind trial investigating effect on excitability of peripheral myelinated axons in vivo and in vitro [[1501]] Disease Stage: Healthy volunteers [[1501]] Enrollment/Number of Patients: 20 healthy volunteers [[1501]] Duration: Two hours [[1501]] Status/Outcome: Study completed, results not yet released [[1501]] |
|
| Glatiramer acetate |
Trial name: Glatiramer Acetate Low-Frequency Administration (GALA) (press releases, June 2012 and October 2012) [[2158]] [[3588]] Phase: Phase III trial [[2158]] Study Design: Company-sponsored, multinational, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial to study the safety and effect of glatiramer acetate injection (40 mg/1 ml, administered 3 times weekly) on reducing the number of confirmed relapses (primary endpoint) [the dose in this study is higher but less frequent than the marketed dose (20 mg/1 ml daily) at the time of this press release] [[2158]] Disease Stage: RRMS [[2158]] Enrollment/Number of Patients: >1400 [[2158]] Duration: 12 months [[2158]] Status/Outcome: Drug at the 40 mg/1 ml dose reduced the annualized relapse rate by 34.4% as compared with placebo [[2158]]; additionally, the drug at this dose reduced the cumulative number of new and enlarging T2 lesions by 34.4% and the cumulative number of gadolinium-enhancing lesions by 44.8% as compared with placebo, but the drug did not affect the percent change of brain volume at 12 months [[3588]] Trial name: Comparator and aN oral Fumarate In RRMS (CONFIRM) (publ September 2012, press release April 2012) [[1793]] [[3222]] Phase: Phase III trial [[1793]] [[3222]] Study Design: Company-sponsored, global, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, dose-comparison study to determine the safety and efficacy of oral BG-12 (dimethyl fumarate) (240 mg given either twice a day or three times a day) or glatiramer acetate (20 mg subcutaneous injection each day) in reducing the annualized relapse rate (ARR) (primary endpoint) and the proportion of patients who relapse at two years and the number of T2-hyperintense lesions (secondary endpoints); study was not designed to test whether BG-12 is superior or noninferior to glatiramer acetate [[1793]] [[3222]] Disease Stage: RRMS [[1793]] [[3222]] Enrollment/Number of Patients: 1430 [[1793]] [[3222]] Duration: 2 years [[1793]] [[3222]] Status/Outcome: BG-12 reduced the ARR by 44% (twice a day dose; ARR=0.22) or 51% (three times a day dose; ARR=0.20) and glatiramer acetate reduced this rate by 29% (ARR=0.29) as compared to placebo (ARR=0.40); BG-12 reduced the proportion of patients who relapsed at two years by 34% (twice a day dose) or 45% (three times a day dose) and glatiramer acetate reduced this rate by 29% as compared to placebo; BG-12 also had a significant effect on brain lesions [[1793]] [[3222]] Trial name: Early GA Treatment in Delaying Conversion to Clinically Definite Multiple Sclerosis in Subjects Presenting With a Clinically Isolated Syndrome (CIS) (PreCISe) (publ 2009; further analyses publ 2013) [[343]] [[360]] [[5629]] Phase: Phase III trial [[491]] Study Design: Randomized, double-blind, multicenter trial to study the effect of early glatiramer acetate (20 mg per day) on the time to clinically definite MS from clinically isolated syndrome (primary outcome measure) [[360]] Disease Stage: CIS [[360]] Enrollment/Number of Patients: 481 [[360]] Duration: Up to 36 months [[360]] Status/Outcome: Drug reduced the risk of CIS converting to clinically definite MS by 45% as compared to placebo [[360]]; in a substudy (involving 34 patients, 20 of whom did not relapse and were in the study through 12 months of followup), the drug (versus placebo) appeared to exert a neuroprotective effect in a large central brain volume, based on measurements of the ratio of a marker of neuronal integrity (N-acetylaspartate) relative to creatine [[5629]] Trial name: Metz et al., Mult. Scler., Oct 2009 trial [[361]] Phase: Phase II trial [[361]] Study Design: Double-blind, placebo-controlled study to compare the effects of glatiramer acetate plus minocycline (100 mg twice daily) vs. glatiramer acetate plus placebo on the total number of T1 gadolinium-enhanced lesions [[361]] Disease Stage: RRMS (28) Enrollment/Number of Patients: 44, with 40 completing study [[361]] Duration: 9 months [[361]] Status/Outcome: Glatiramer acetate plus minocycline reduced the number of T1 gadolinium-enhanced lesions by 63% as compared to glatiramer acetate alone [[361]] Trial name: PROMiSe Trial [[381]] Phase: Phase III trial [[955]] Study Design: Multinational, multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial to test whether glatiramer acetate (20 mg per day) results in a delay in time to sustained progression of accumulated disability in PPMS (primary outcome) [[381]] Disease Stage: PPMS [[381]] Enrollment/Number of Patients: 943 [[381]] Duration: 3 years [[381]] Status/Outcome: Study was stopped prematurely when an interim analysis (at which time 757 patients had completed 2 or more years of the study or had ended participation prematurely) showed that there was no discernible effect of glatiramer acetate on the primary outcome [[381]] Trial name: Comi et al., Ann. Neurol., Mar 2001 trial [[400]] Phase: Phase of trial not stated in article [[400]] Study Design: Multicenter, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled European/Canadian trial to study the effects of glatiramer acetate (20 mg per day) on disease activity (primary outcome, the number of enhancing lesions on T1-weighted images), as measured with monthly MRI scans and clinical assessments [[400]] Disease Stage: RRMS [[400]] Enrollment/Number of Patients: 239 [[400]] Duration: 9 months [[400]] Status/Outcome: Drug was associated with a reduction in the total number of enhancing lesions (-10.8) as compared to placebo (primary outcome), as well as a reduction in the relapse rate (33%) in the treatment vs. placebo group [[400]] Trial name: Johnson et al., Neurology, July 1995 trial [[412]] Phase: Phase III trial [[412]] Study Design: Multicenter, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial to determine whether glatiramer acetate (20 mg per day) caused a difference in the relapse rate (primary end point) [[412]] Disease Stage: RRMS [[412]] Enrollment/Number of Patients: 251 [[412]] Duration: 2 years [[412]] Status/Outcome: Drug was associated with a reduction in the relapse rate (primary outcome measure) (1.19 vs. 1.68 over 2 years in the treatment vs. placebo group) [[412]] Trial name: Bornstein et al., N. Engl. J. Med., Aug 1987 trial [[414]] Phase: Pilot trial; phase II trial [[414]] Study Design: Single-center, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial to test the effects of glatiramer acetate (20 mg per day) on the number of exacerbations [[414]] Disease Stage: Exacerbating-remitting MS [[414]] Enrollment/Number of Patients: 50 [[414]] Duration: 2 years (2) Status/Outcome: Drug was associated with a reduction in the number of exacerbations (0.6 vs 2.7 average per patient in treatment vs. placebo group over 2 years) [[414]] |
Trial name: Calabrese et al., Mult. Scler., April 2012 trial [[3009]] Phase: Postmarketing [[3009]] Study Design: Randomized study to compare the effects of subcutaneous (sc) interferon beta-1a (44 mcg three times weekly), intramuscular (im) interferon beta-1a (30 mcg weekly), and glatiramer acetate (20 mg daily) on the development of cortical lesions and cortical atrophy [[3009]] Disease Stage: RRMS [[3009]] Enrollment/Number of Patients: 165 treated patients and 50 untreated patients, with 141 treated patients completing the study [[3009]] Duration: 24 months [[3009]] Status/Outcome: Interferon beta-1a and glatiramer acetate significantly decreased the development of new cortical lesions and the progression of cortical atrophy, with the most pronounced effects seen with sc interferon beta-1a, such that at 12 months, one or more new cortical lesions were seen in 26% of patients receiving sc interferon beta-1a, 64% of patients receiving im interferon beta-1a, 50% of patients receiving glatiramer acetate, and 74% of untreated patient [[3009]] Trial name: Combination Therapy in Patients With Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis (CombiRx) (results described at meeting, July 2012, publ February 2013) [[2567]] [[2566]] [[5011]] Phase: Phase III trial [[2567]] [[2566]] Study Design: NIH-funded, randomized, double-blind, controlled study to examine whether a combination of interferon beta-1a (30 microg, intramuscularly, per week) and glatiramer acetate (20 mg per day) is more effective than either treatment alone plus placebo, with a reduction in the annualized relapse rate (ARR) the primary endpoint; time to confirmed disability, the Multiple Sclerosis Functional Composite (MSFC) score, and MRI measures were among the secondary endpoints [[2567]] [[2566]] [[5011]] [[5364]] Disease Stage: RRMS [[2567]] [[2566]] [[5011]] Enrollment/Number of Patients: 1008 [[2567]] [[2566]] [[5011]] Duration: 3 years [[2567]] [[2566]] [[5011]] Status/Outcome: Combination therapy did not reduce the risk of relapse as compared to glatiramer acetate alone, but both of those treatments were superior to interferon beta-1a in this regard; combination therapy did not reduce confirmed progression of the Extended Disability Status Scale or MSFC score as compared to either therapy alone, but combination therapy was better than either therapy alone in reducing the accumulation of lesions and new lesion activity [[5011]]; the combination therapy resulted in a half-point benefit on the 22-point scale measuring bladder control [[2567]] [[2566]] Trial name: Rinaldi et al., Mult. Scler., May 2012 trial [[1697]] Phase: Postmarketing [[1697]] Study Design: Prospective study to determine the efficacy of natalizumab versus interferon beta-1a or glatiramer acetate in reducing the accumulation of new cortical lesions [[1697]] Disease Stage: RRMS [[1697]] Enrollment/Number of Patients: 120 [[1697]] Duration: 2 years [[1697]] Status/Outcome: Natalizumab reduced the accumulation of new cortical lesions and the progression of cortical atrophy as compared to interferon beta-1a, glatiramer acetate, or no treatment [[1697]] Trial name: BECOME (BEtaseron vs COpaxone in Multiple Sclerosis with Triple-Dose Gadolinium and 3-Tesla MRI Endpoints) (publ 2009) [[365]] Phase: Phase IV [[956]] Study Design: Trial to compare the ability of interferon beta-1b and glatiramer acetate to suppress signs of disease activity (primary outcome, number of combined active lesions per patient per scan in first year) as measured by monthly brain MRI [[365]] Disease Stage: CIS or RRMS [[365]] Enrollment/Number of Patients: 75 [[365]] Duration: Up to 2 years [[365]] Status/Outcome: Patients taking either interferon beta-1b and glatiramer acetate showed similar numbers of combined active lesions per patient for first year (primary outcome) and similar numbers of relapses for 2 years [[365]] Trial name: BEYOND (Betaferon Efficiency Yielding Outcomes of a New Dose) (publ 2009) [[362]] Phase: Phase III trial [[957]] Study Design: Multicenter, randomised, prospective study to compare the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of interferon beta-1b (250 or 500 microg every other day) and glatiramer acetate (20 mg per day) (primary outcome, relapse risk) [[362]] Disease Stage: RRMS [[362]] Enrollment/Number of Patients: 2447 [[362]] Duration: 2.0 to 3.5 years [[362]] Status/Outcome: Relapse risk, expanded disability status scale progression, and T1-hypointense lesion volume were similar among all treatment groups [[362]] Trial name: REGARD (REbif vs Glatiramer Acetate in Relapsing MS Disease) (publ 2008) [[371]] Phase: Phase IV trial [[958]] Study Design: Multicenter, randomised, comparative, parallel-group, open-label study to compare effect of interferon beta-1a (44 microg 3 times a week) and glatiramer acetate (20 mg per day) on time to first relapse (primary outcome) or brain lesions (secondary outcomes) [[371]] Disease Stage: RRMS [[371]] Enrollment/Number of Patients: 764 [[371]] Duration: 96 weeks [[371]] Status/Outcome: Study showed no significant difference between interferon beta-1a and glatiramer acetate on the primary outcome or secondary outcomes, except that interferon beta-1a was associated with fewer gadolinium-enhanding lesions per patient per scan [[371]] |
Trial name: Jokubaitis et al., PLoS One, March 2013 study [[5370]] Phase: Prospective cohort study [[5370]] Study Design: Multicenter Australian cohort study using the MSBase platform to characterize use of disease-modifying therapies (DMTs, which included interferon beta, glatiramer acetate, and natalizumab); specifically, treatment persistence, factors that predict treatment discontinuation, and rates of switching between DMTs were studied [[5370]] Disease Stage: RRMS [[5370]] Enrollment/Number of Patients: 1113 [[5370]] Duration: 4.2 years (median time patients were followed) [[5370]] Status/Outcome: Treatment persistence in this study was short, such that patients remained on their first DMT for 2.5 years (median) and on their next DMT for 2.3 years; annualized switch or cessation rates were 9.5 to 12.5% (interferon beta), 11.6% (glatiramer acetate), and 4.4% (natalizumab); younger age and higher disability scores predicted DMT discontinuation [[5370]] Trial name: CombiRx extension study (conference report, March 2013) [[5364]] Phase: Extension phase of Phase III trial [[5011]] [[5364]] Study Design: Extension of the CombiRx trial, comparing effectiveness of combination therapy (interferon beta-1a and glatiramer acetate) with either therapy alone in reducing the annualized relapse rate (primary endpoint) [[5364]] Disease Stage: RRMS (in original study) [[5011]] [[5364]] Enrollment/Number of Patients: 687 [[5364]] Duration: 90 months [[5364]] Status/Outcome: Combination therapy did not reduce the risk of relapsing or confirmed disability progression as compared to glatiramer acetate, and glatiramer acetate reduced the risk of relapse more than interferon beta-1a, over 90 months; combination therapy was associated with a higher proportion of patients who were free of disease activity (driven by results from MRI) as compared with either therapy alone, but this effect is reduced over time [[5364]] Trial name: Comparison of Patients Treated with Natalizumab and Interferon-Beta/Glatiramer Using Propensity-Matched Multiple Sclerosis Registry Data (press release, 18 March 2013) [[5315]] Phase: Retrospective medical record review [[5315]] Study Design: Data from two MS patient registries [TYSABRI Observational Program (TOP) and MSCOMET] were used in a propensity-matched analysis to compare the effects of natalizumab, interferon beta, and glatiramer acetate on relapses [[5315]] Disease Stage: MS [[5315]] Enrollment/Number of Patients: N/A [[5315]] Duration: N/A [[5315]] Status/Outcome: Natalizumab was associated with a lower rate of first relapse as compared to interferon beta and glatiramer acetate; relapses in patients treated with natalizumab also occurred more slowly than in those treated with the other drugs [[5315]] Trial name: Romeo et al., Eur. J. Neurol., February 2013 study [[5033]] Phase: Observational/open-label study [[5033]] Study Design: Observational study to determine clinical- and MRI-based predictors of response to glatiramer acetate and interferon beta; patients were considered "responders" if clinical and MRI activity were absent during treatment and "non-responders" in the presence of MRI activity or if the reduction in annualized relapse rate (ARR) was <50% of the ARR in the 2 previous years [[5033]] Disease Stage: RRMS [[5033]] Enrollment/Number of Patients: 594 [[5033]] Duration: 2 years [[5033]] Status/Outcome: Later age at disease onset, a lower level of disability, and a lower number of gadolinium-enhancing lesions at baseline were predictors of response, on the basis of a multivariate analysis [[5033]] Trial name: Brandes et al., J. Med. Econ., February 2013 study [[4902]] Phase: Observational study [[4902]] Study Design: Analysis to assess the effect of real-world adherence (estimated from a study of a single claims database of a national pharmacy benefit manager) on the cost-effectiveness (the cost per avoided relapse) of fingolimod, subcutaneous interferon beta-1b (Extavia or Betaseron) and interferon beta-1a, glatiramer acetate, and intramuscular interferon beta-1a [[4902]] Disease Stage: MS [[4902]] Enrollment/Number of Patients: N/A [[4902]] Duration: N/A [[4902]] Status/Outcome: Costs per relapse avoided were estimated at $90,566 (fingolimod), $127,024 (Extavia), $137,492 (Betaseron), $144,016 (subcutaneous inferferon beta-1a), $160,314 (glatiramer acetate), and $312,629 (intramuscular interferon beta-1a) [[4902]] Trial name: Comi et al., Mult. Scler., December 2012 study (analyses of results obtained during open-label phase of the PreCISe trial) [[360]] [[4203]] Phase: Open-label extension study [[4203]] Study Design: Industry-sponsored, open-label extension study to compare the effects of early treatment (at randomization during the placebo-controlled phase of the PreCISe trial; 20 mg daily subcutaneous dose) versus delayed treatment (in patients originally randomized to placebo and then switched to glatiramer acetate in the open-label phase) in CIS patients [[4203]] Disease Stage: CIS [[4203]] Enrollment/Number of Patients: 409 (in open-label phase), with 289 completing the study [[4203]] Duration: Median time on drug was 1709 days (early-treatment group) versus 1260 days (delayed-treatment group) [[4203]] Status/Outcome: Early treatment reduced the risk of conversion to clinically definite MS by 41% versus delayed treatment; early treatment was associated with a 972-day delay in conversion [[4203]] Trial name: Lu et al., Neurology, August 2012 study [[2959]] Phase: Retrospective literature review [[2959]] Study Design: Systematic review of the literature for information about the effects of interferon beta, glatiramer acetate, or natalizumab on the offspring of MS patients who used these disease-modifying drugs (DMDs) during pregnancy [[2959]] Disease Stage: MS [[2959]] Enrollment/Number of Patients: 97 glatiramer acetate-exposed pregnancies were identified [[2959]] Duration: N/A [[2959]] Status/Outcome: Glatiramer acetate exposure during pregnancy was not associated with preterm birth, spontaneous abortion, congenital anomalies, or lower mean birth weight, but discontinuing DMD use before conception continues to be recommended [[2959]] Trial name: Rossi et al., Eur. J. Neurol., June 2012 study [[2319]] Phase: Observational/open-label study [[2319]] Study Design: Multicenter, open-label, non-randomized, prospective, pilot study to determine if glatiramer acetate is effective and safe in patients who have discontinued natalizumab; glatiramer acetate treatment was initiated 4 weeks after natalizumab was discontinued [[2319]] Disease Stage: RRMS [[2319]] Enrollment/Number of Patients: 40 [[2319]] Duration: 12 months [[2319]] Status/Outcome: Twelve months after beginning glatiramer acetate treatment, 62.5% of patients were relapse-free; the annualized relapse rate and time to relapse were both lower than before natalizumab treatment, indicating that glatiramer acetate can reduce the possibility of MS rebound or early reactivation after natalizumab is discontinued [[2319]] Trial name: Roskell et al., Curr. Med. Res. Opin., May 2012 study [[3359]] Phase: Retrospective trial review [[3359]] Study Design: Meta-analysis of placebo-controlled and head-to-head trials, which evaluated the effects of one or more drugs (fingolimod, interferon beta-1a, interferon beta-1b, and/or glatiramer acetate), to compare the effects of fingolimod versus the other treatments on the annualized relapse rate (ARR) [[3359]] Disease Stage: RRMS [[3359]] Enrollment/Number of Patients: N/A [[3359]] Duration: N/A [[3359]] Status/Outcome: Meta-analyses indicated that fingolimod significantly reduced the ARR as compared to the other drugs; the relative ARRs for each drug versus fingolimod were 1.43 (glatiramer acetate, 20 mg dose), 1.51 (interferon beta-1b, 250 microg dose), 1.55 (interferon beta-1a, 44 microg dose), 1.67 (interferon beta-1a, 22 microg dose), 1.93 (interferon beta-1a, 30 microg dose), and 2.32 (placebo) [[3359]] Trial name: Del Santo et al., Eur. J. Clin. Pharmacol., April 2012 study [[2482]] Phase: Retrospective trial review [[2482]] Study Design: Review of 10 randomized trials that tested interferon, glatiramer acetate, natalizumab, or fingolimod in RRMS, such that the relapse-free rates at 12 months were compared, either directly or through network meta-analysis [[2482]] Disease Stage: RRMS [[2482]] Enrollment/Number of Patients: N/A [[2482]] Duration: N/A [[2482]] Status/Outcome: Fingolimod was determined to have the most favorable profile with respect to relapse-free rate at the follow-up assessment at 1 year [[2482]] Trial name: Meca-Lallana et al., J. Neurol. Sci., April 2012 study [[4248]] Phase: Observational study [[4248]] Study Design: Observational, multicenter study to evaluate changes in spasticity after a switch from interferon beta to glatiramer acetate treatment, with the primary endpoint made up of changes in the Penn Spasm Frequency Scale, Modified Ashworth Scale, Adductor Tone Rating Scale, and Global Pain Score at 3 and 6 months after the switch [[4248]] Disease Stage: RMMS, with spasticity [[4248]] Enrollment/Number of Patients: 68 [[4248]] Duration: 6 months [[4248]] Status/Outcome: Switching to glatiramer acetate led to statistically significant improvement in spasm frequence, muscle tone, and pain after 3 and 6 months [[4248]] Trial name: Khan et al., J. Neurol. Sci., January 2012 study [[3065]] Phase: Retrospective medical record review [[3065]] Study Design: Study to measure the effects of glatiramer acetate (20 mg, injected subcuraneously once a day; 121 patients), interferon beta-1a (30 mcg, injected intramuscularly once a week; 53 patients), and interferon beta-1b (250 mcg, injected subcutaneously every other day; 101 patients), with treatments given for five years, on the loss of brain volume in previously treatment-naïve patients with relatively early RRMS (of less than or equal to five years duration when the study began); patients received brain MRI scans on the same scanner with the same protocol at baseline and year 5 [[3065]] Disease Stage: RRMS [[3065]] Enrollment/Number of Patients: 275 [[3065]] Duration: 5 years [[3065]] Status/Outcome: The disease-modifying therapies were associated with an adjusted (for pseudoatrophy in the first year) percentage change in brain volume (PCBV) over five years of -2.27% (glatiramer acetate), -2.62% (interferon beta-1a), and -3.21% (interferon beta-1b), which were all significantly reduced as compared to the PCBV (-4.75%) for 34 patients who were untreated for 8 to 24 months [[3065]] Trial name: Jongen et al., Health Qual. Life Outcomes, November 2010 study [[4981]] Phase: Observational/open-label study [[4981]] Study Design: Investigator-initiated, prospective, observational, international, multicenter study to determine whether glatiramer acetate increases the health-related quality of life (HR-QoL), reduces fatigue, and/or reduces depression during the first 12 months of treatment [[4981]] Disease Stage: RRMS [[4981]] Enrollment/Number of Patients: 197 (91 with previous immunomodulatory or immunosuppressive treatment and 106 without such treatment) [[4981]] Duration: 12 months [[4981]] Status/Outcome: In the previously untreated group, glatiramer acetate increased the HR-QoL score (such that 43% of the patients had improved scores at 12 months) and decreased fatigue at 6 and 12 months, whereas these improvements did not occur in the previously treated group; neither group experienced changes in depression [[4981]] Trial name: US Glatiramer Acetate Trial (publ 2010) [[355]] Phase: Extension study [[355]] Study Design: Ongoing open-label trial to study up to 15 years of continuous glatiramer acetate as only disease-modifying therapy [[355]] Disease Stage: RRMS [[355]] Enrollment/Number of Patients: 232 enrolled when study began in 1991 and 100 were continuing as of Feb 2008 [[355]] Duration: Beginning 20th year as of 2011 (K. Johnson, ECTRIMS, Oct 2011) Status/Outcome: Drug is associated with reduced relapse rates and decreased progression to disability and SPMS, with no long-term safety issues [[355]] |
| Interferon beta-1a |
Trial name: ADVANCE (press releases, 24 January 2013 and 20 March 2013) [[4731]] [[5316]] Phase: Phase III trial [[4731]] Study Design: Company-sponsored, global, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, placebo-controlled trial to test the safety and efficacy of peginterferon beta-1a, a form of interferon beta-1a that is pegylated to increase its half-life, given subcutaneously at a dose of 125 microg either once every two weeks or once every four weeks; the primary endpoint is the annualized relapse rate (ARR) at one year [[4731]] Disease Stage: RRMS [[4731]] Enrollment/Number of Patients: 1516 [[4731]] Duration: Two years [[4731]] Status/Outcome: Peginterferon beta-1a was associated with a significant reduction in ARR at one year (35.6% for the two-week dosing and 27.5% for the four-week dosing) as compared to placebo [[4731]]; also at one year, peginterferon beta-1a decreased the percentage of patients who relapsed (by 39%), the number of new T2-hyperintense lesions (by 67%), and the risk of 12-week confirmed disability progression (by 38%) as compared to placebo [[5316]] Trial name: Leary et al., Neurol., Jan 2003 trial [[1079]] Phase: Phase II trial [[1079]] Study Design: Randomized, controlled, open-label, single-center exploratory trial of safety and efficacy (primary endpoint: sustained progression in disability) of two doses (30 micrograms and 60 micrograms) of interferon beta-1a in patients with PPMS [[1079]] Disease Stage: PPMS [[1079]] Enrollment/Number of Patients: 50 (49 completed) [[1079]] Duration: Two years [[1079]] Status/Outcome: Drug was well-tolerated at low dose but caused severe flu-like syndrome at high dose; no evidence of efficacy [[1079]] Trial name: Secondary Progressive Efficacy Clinical Trial of Recombinant Interferon Beta-1a in MS (SPECTRIMS) study (publ 2001) [[1080]] [[1081]] Phase: Phase III trial [[1080]] Study Design: Randomized, placebo-controlled, multicenter parallel-group study to determine whether interferon beta-1a (subcutaneous, 22 or 44 micrograms 3x weekly) increased time to confirmed progression of disability (primary endpoint) [[1080]] Disease Stage: SPMS [[1080]] Enrollment/Number of Patients: 618 [[1080]] Duration: Three years [[1080]] Status/Outcome: No significant effect on disability progression, although there appeared to be greater benefit in women; caused significant improvement on MRI measures, particularly in patients who had experienced relapses in the past two years [[1080]] [[1081]] Trial name: Controlled High Risk Avonex Multiple Sclerosis (CHAMPS) study (publ 2001) [[1082]] Phase: Phase III trial [[1082]] Study Design: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter trial to determine whether weekly injections of drug (intramuscular) in patients experiencing a single demyelinating event lowered the incidence of MS (primary endpoint) [[1082]] Disease Stage: Clinically isolated syndrome [[1082]] Enrollment/Number of Patients: 383 patients who had experienced a first demyelinating event and showed MRI evidence of two or more clinically silent lesions of the brain [[1082]] Duration: Three years ([[1082]] Status/Outcome: After 3 years of treatment, the probability that patients had developed clinically defined MS was 35% for the interferon group and 50% for the placebo group; patients on interferon also showed a relative reduction in the volume of brain lesions, fewer new or enlarging lesions, and fewer gadolinium-enhancing lesions [[1082]] Trial name: Prevention of Relapses and Disability by Interferon beta-1a Subcutaneously in Multiple Sclerosis (PRISMS) trial (publ 1998) [[1083]] Phase: Phase III [[1083]] Study Design: Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter study to test the efficacy of two doses (22 micrograms and 44 micrograms) of subcutaneous interferon beta-1a therapy (primary endpont: relapse rate) [[1083]] Disease Stage: RRMS [[1083]] Enrollment/Number of Patients: 560 patients [[1083]] Duration: Two years [[1083]] Status/Outcome: Treatment significantly reduced relapse rate (mean number per patient: 1.82 at 22 micrograms; 1.73 at 44 micrograms; 2.56 for placebo); time to first relapse was extended by 3 (22 micrograms) and 5 (44 micrograms) months [[1083]] Trial name: Multiple Sclerosis Collaborative Research Group, Ann. Neurol., March 1996 trial [[1084]] Phase: Phase III trial [[1084]] Study Design: Randomized, placebo-controlled, multicenter trial examining whether interferon beta-1a (30 micrograms/week, intramuscularly) could delay time to sustained sustained disability progression of at least one point on the Kurtzke Expanded Disability Status Scale (primary endpoint) [[1084]] Disease Stage: RRMS [[1084]] Enrollment/Number of Patients: 301 patients enrolled; because the study was stopped prematurely, just 282 completed 1 year, 172 completed 2 years [[1084]] [[1063]] Duration: Two years [[1084]] Status/Outcome: 34.9% of patients progressed on placebo, whereas 21.9% progressed on drug; annual exacerbation rate was 0.90 with placebo and 0.61 with drug [[1084]] |
Trial name: Calabrese et al., Mult. Scler., April 2012 trial [[3009]] Phase: Postmarketing [[3009]] Study Design: Randomized study to compare the effects of subcutaneous (sc) interferon beta-1a (44 mcg three times weekly), intramuscular (im) interferon beta-1a (30 mcg weekly), and glatiramer acetate (20 mg daily) on the development of cortical lesions and cortical atrophy [[3009]] Disease Stage: RRMS [[3009]] Enrollment/Number of Patients: 165 treated patients and 50 untreated patients, with 141 treated patients completing the study [[3009]] Duration: 24 months [[3009]] Status/Outcome: Interferon beta-1a and glatiramer acetate significantly decreased the development of new cortical lesions and the progression of cortical atrophy, with the most pronounced effects seen with sc interferon beta-1a, such that at 12 months, one or more new cortical lesions were seen in 26% of patients receiving sc interferon beta-1a, 64% of patients receiving im interferon beta-1a, 50% of patients receiving glatiramer acetate, and 74% of untreated patients [[3009]] Trial name: Combination Therapy in Patients With Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis (CombiRx) (results described at meeting, July 2012, publ February 2013) [[2567]] [[2566]] [[5011]] Phase: Phase III trial [[2567]] [[2566]] Study Design: NIH-funded, randomized, double-blind, controlled study to examine whether a combination of interferon beta-1a (30 microg, intramuscularly, per week) and glatiramer acetate (20 mg per day) is more effective than either treatment alone plus placebo, with a reduction in the annualized relapse rate (ARR) the primary endpoint; time to confirmed disability, the Multiple Sclerosis Functional Composite (MSFC) score, and MRI measures were among the secondary endpoints [[2567]] [[2566]] [[5011]] [[5364]] Disease Stage: RRMS [[2567]] [[2566]] [[5011]] Enrollment/Number of Patients: 1008 [[2567]] [[2566]] [[5011]] Duration: 3 years [[2567]] [[2566]] [[5011]] Status/Outcome: Combination therapy did not reduce the risk of relapse as compared to glatiramer acetate alone, but both of those treatments were superior to interferon beta-1a in this regard; combination therapy did not reduce confirmed progression of the Extended Disability Status Scale or MSFC score as compared to either therapy alone, but combination therapy was better than either therapy alone in reducing the accumulation of lesions and new lesion activity [[5011]]; combination therapy resulted in a half-point benefit on the 22-point scale measuring bladder control [[2567]] [[2566]] Trial name: Rinaldi et al., Mult. Scler., May 2012 trial [[1697]] Phase: Postmarketing [[1697]] Study Design: Prospective study to determine the efficacy of natalizumab versus interferon beta-1a or glatiramer acetate in reducing the accumulation of new cortical lesions [[1697]] Disease Stage: RRMS [[1697]] Enrollment/Number of Patients: 120 [[1697]] Duration: 2 years [[1697]] Status/Outcome: Natalizumab reduced the accumulation of new cortical lesions and the progression of cortical atrophy as compared to interferon beta-1a, glatiramer acetate, or no treatment [[1697]] Trial name: Comparison of Alemtuzumab and Rebif Efficacy in Multiple Sclerosis I (CARE-MS I) (reported July 2011, publ October 2012) [[784]] [[3822]] Phase: Phase III trial [[784]] [[3822]] Study Design: Industry-sponsored, randomized, multicenter, rater-blinded, controlled trial to compare the effects of two cycles of intravenous alemtuzumab (12 mg per day, once a day for 5 consecutive days at baseline and once a day for 3 days at 12 months) with interferon beta1a (44 mcg given subcutaneously three times a week) on relapse rate and time to 6 month sustained accumulation of disability (coprimary endpoints) [[784]] [[3822]] Disease Stage: Treatment-naïve, early, active RRMS [[784]] [[3822]] Enrollment/Number of Patients: 581 patients who had received no prior MS therapy [[784]] [[3822]] Duration: 2 years [[784]] [[3822]] Status/Outcome: In the group receiving alemtuzumab (376 patients included in the primary analyses), 82 (22%) relapsed, whereas in the group receiving interferon beta-1a (195 patients included in the primary analyses), 75 (40%) relapsed, which corresponds to a 54.9% improvement with alemtuzumab; at 2 years, 78% in the alemtuzumab group were relapse free versus 59% in the interferon beta-1a group; 30 (8%) in the alemtuzumab group displayed sustained accumulation of disability versus 20 (11%) in the interferon beta-1a group [[784]] [[3822]] Trial name: Comparison of Alemtuzumab and Rebif Efficacy in Multiple Sclerosis II (CARE-MS II) (reported November 2011, publ October 2012) [[789]] [[3823]] Phase: Phase III trial [[789]] [[3823]] Study Design: Industry-sponsored, randomized, multicenter, rater-blinded, controlled trial to compare the effects of two cycles of intravenous alemtuzumab [either 24 mg (a dose that was discontinued) or 12 mg per day, once a day for 5 consecutive days at baseline and once a day for 3 days at 12 months] with interferon beta-1a (44 mcg given subcutaneously three times a week) on relapse rate and time to 6 month sustained accumulation of disability (coprimary endpoints) [[789]] [[3823]] Disease Stage: RRMS, relapsed while on prior therapy [[789]] [[3823]] Enrollment/Number of Patients: 840 patients who had experienced relapse while on prior therapy [[789]] [[3823]] Duration: 2 years [[789]] [[3823]] Status/Outcome: In the group receiving alemtuzumab (12 mg dose) (426 patients included in the primary analyses), 147 (35%) relapsed, whereas in the group receiving interferon beta-1a (202 patients included in the primary analyses), 104 (51%) relapsed, which corresponds to a 49.4% improvement with alemtuzumab; at 2 years, 278 (65%) in the alemtuzumab group were relapse free versus 94 (47%) in the interferon beta-1a group; 54 (13%) in the alemtuzumab group displayed sustained accumulation of disability versus 40 (20%) in the interferon beta-1a group [[789]] [[3823]] Trial name: Trial Assessing Injectable Interferon versus FTY720 Oral in Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis (TRANSFORMS) (publ 2010, conference report March 2013, additional analyses publ April 2013) [[5361]] [[302]] [[5862]] Phase: Phase III trial [[302]] Study Design: Multicenter, randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, parallel group trial to compare the efficacy of a daily oral dose of fingolimod (1.25 mg or 0.5 mg) versus a weekly intramuscular dose of interferon beta-1a (30 micrograms) [[302]] Disease Stage: RRMS [[302]] Enrollment/Number of Patients: 1292 (with 1153 completing study) [[302]] Duration: 12 months [[302]] Status/Outcome: Fingolimod was associated with a lower annualized relapse rate (ARR) than interferon beta-1a [0.20 (1.25 mg dose) or 0.16 (0.5 mg dose) for fingolimod versus 0.33 for interferon beta-1a] and with significantly fewer lesions in MRI scans at 12 months than interferon beta-1a, whereas no differences in time to confirmed progression of disability were seen [[302]]; over 1 year, fingolimod decreased the rate of brain volume loss by -32% as compared to interferon beta-1a [[5361]]; when specific subgroups (defined on the basis of demographics, baseline disease characteristics, and previous responses to therapy) were analyzed, fingolimod reduced the ARR over 1 year by 32 to 59% relative to interferon beta-1a in all subgroups based on demographics or baseline disease characteristics; in patients with high levels of disease activity during interferon beta treatment in the previous year (before the study), fingolimod reduced the ARR by 61% as compared to interferon beta-1a [[5862]]
Trial name: International Campath-1H in Multiple Sclerosis CAMMS223 (publ 2008) [[448]] Phase: Phase II trial [[448]] Study Design: Industry-sponsored, randomized, multicenter, rater-blinded trial to compare the efficacy of an annual infusion of alemtuzumab (12 mg or 24 mg) to thrice-weekly subcutaneous interferon beta-1a (44 micrograms) [[448]] Disease Stage: RRMS [[448]] Enrollment/Number of Patients: 334 (with 333 completing the study) [[448]] Duration: 36 months [[448]] Status/Outcome: Drug was associated with a 71% reduction in the relative risk of sustained disability and a 74% relative reduction in relapse rate (primary endpoints). Drug was also associated with a more marked reduction in lesions (T2-weighted MRI) than interferon beta-1a and an increase in brain volume (compared to a decrease with interferon beta-1a); proportion of patients relapse-free after 3 years on drug was 80%, vs 52% for interferon beta-1a (secondary endpoints) [[448]] Trial name: Evidence of Interferon Dose-response-European North American Comparative Efficacy (EVIDENCE) study (publ 2007) [[1085]] [[1480]] [[1481]] Phase: Phase IV/Postmarketing trial [[1085]] [[1480]] [[1481]] Study Design: Multicenter, randomized roll-over comparison of efficacy (primary endpoint: proportion of patients remaining free from relapses) of two doses (44 micrograms subcutaneously, 3x week vs 30 micrograms intramuscularly 1x week) of interferon beta-1a [[1085]] [[1480]] [[1481]] Disease Stage: RRMS [[1085]] [[1480]] [[1481]] Enrollment/Number of Patients: 677 patients enrolled; 605 patients completed the comparative phase and 439 completed the roll-over phase [[1085]] [[1480]] [[1481]] Duration: 1-2 years [[1085]] [[1480]] [[1481]] Status/Outcome: High-dose subcutaneous treatment showed a stronger reduction of clinical and imaging measures [[1085]] [[1480]] [[1481]] Trial name: Koch-Henriksen et al., Neurol., April 2006 trial [[1086]] Phase: Phase IV/Postmarketing trial [[1086]] Study Design: Open-label, multi-center, randomized, head-to-head trial comparing annualized relapse rate, time to first relapse, and neutralizing antibody formation (primary endpoints) in patients taking interferon beta-1a (22 micrograms weekly) versus interferon beta-1b (250 micrograms every other day) [[1086]] Disease Stage: RRMS [[1086]] Enrollment/Number of Patients: 421 [[1086]] Duration: Two years [[1086]] Status/Outcome: No clinical difference between the two treatments [[1086]] |
Trial name: Jokubaitis et al., PLoS One, March 2013 study [[5370]] Phase: Prospective cohort study [[5370]] Study Design: Multicenter Australian cohort study using the MSBase platform to characterize use of disease-modifying therapies (DMTs, which included interferon beta, glatiramer acetate, and natalizumab); specifically, treatment persistence, factors that predict treatment discontinuation, and rates of switching between DMTs were studied [[5370]] Disease Stage: RRMS [[5370]] Enrollment/Number of Patients: 1113 [[5370]] Duration: 4.2 years (median time patients were followed) [[5370]] Status/Outcome: Treatment persistence in this study was short, such that patients remained on their first DMT for 2.5 years (median) and on their next DMT for 2.3 years; annualized switch or cessation rates were 9.5 to 12.5% (interferon beta), 11.6% (glatiramer acetate), and 4.4% (natalizumab); younger age and higher disability scores predicted DMT discontinuation [[5370]] Trial name: CombiRx extension study (conference report, March 2013) [[5364]] Phase: Extension phase of Phase III trial [[5011]] [[5364]] Study Design: Extension of the CombiRx trial, comparing effectiveness of combination therapy (interferon beta-1a and glatiramer acetate) with either therapy alone in reducing the annualized relapse rate (primary endpoint) [[5364]] Disease Stage: RRMS (in original study) [[5011]] [[5364]] Enrollment/Number of Patients: 687 [[5364]] Duration: 90 months [[5364]] Status/Outcome: Combination therapy did not reduce the risk of relapsing or confirmed disability progression as compared to glatiramer acetate, and glatiramer acetate reduced the risk of relapse more than interferon beta-1a, over 90 months; combination therapy was associated with a higher proportion of patients who were free of disease activity (driven by results from MRI) as compared with either therapy alone, but this effect is reduced over time [[5364]] Trial name: Comparison of Patients Treated with Natalizumab and Interferon-Beta/Glatiramer Using Propensity-Matched Multiple Sclerosis Registry Data (press release, 18 March 2013) [[5315]] Phase: Retrospective medical record review [[5315]] Study Design: Data from two MS patient registries [TYSABRI Observational Program (TOP) and MSCOMET] were used in a propensity-matched analysis to compare the effects of natalizumab, interferon beta, and glatiramer acetate on relapses [[5315]] Disease Stage: MS [[5315]] Enrollment/Number of Patients: N/A [[5315]] Duration: N/A [[5315]] Status/Outcome: Natalizumab was associated with a lower rate of first relapse as compared to interferon beta and glatiramer acetate; relapses in patients treated with natalizumab also occurred more slowly than in those treated with the other drugs [[5315]] Trial name: Romeo et al., Eur. J. Neurol., February 2013 study [[5033]] Phase: Observational/open-label study [[5033]] Study Design: Observational study to determine clinical- and MRI-based predictors of response to glatiramer acetate and interferon beta; patients were considered "responders" if clinical and MRI activity were absent during treatment and "non-responders" in the presence of MRI activity or if the reduction in annualized relapse rate (ARR) was <50% of the ARR in the 2 previous years [[5033]] Disease Stage: RRMS [[5033]] Enrollment/Number of Patients: 594 [[5033]] Duration: 2 years [[5033]] Status/Outcome: Later age at disease onset, a lower level of disability, and a lower number of gadolinium-enhancing lesions at baseline were predictors of response, on the basis of a multivariate analysis [[5033]] Trial name: Brandes et al., J. Med. Econ., February 2013 study [[4902]] Phase: Observational study [[4902]] Study Design: Analysis to assess the effect of real-world adherence (estimated from a study of a single claims database of a national pharmacy benefit manager) on the cost-effectiveness (the cost per avoided relapse) of fingolimod, subcutaneous interferon beta-1b (Extavia or Betaseron) and interferon beta-1a, glatiramer acetate, and intramuscular interferon beta-1a [[4902]] Disease Stage: MS [[4902]] Enrollment/Number of Patients: N/A [[4902]] Duration: N/A [[4902]] Status/Outcome: Costs per relapse avoided were estimated at $90,566 (fingolimod), $127,024 (Extavia), $137,492 (Betaseron), $144,016 (subcutaneous inferferon beta-1a), $160,314 (glatiramer acetate), and $312,629 (intramuscular interferon beta-1a) [[4902]] Trial name: Cadavid et al., PLoS One, January 2013 study [[4535]] Phase: Retrospective trial review [[4535]] Study Design: Company-sponsored retrospective review of clinical trial results to determine the effects of natalizumab or interferon beta-1a on ambulatory function, as measured by a timed 25-foot walk, in subjects with an Expanded Disability Status Scale score ≥3.5; a response was defined as a faster walking time relative to the predose walking time over different treatment periods (6-9 months or 24-30 months) [[4535]] Disease Stage: RRMS and SPMS [[4535]] Enrollment/Number of Patients: N/A [[4535]] Duration: N/A [[4535]] Status/Outcome: More (2-4 times as many) disabled patients showed a response in the timed 25-foot walk in the natalizumab groups than in the placebo or interferon beta-1a groups; responders were 24%-45% faster than those who did not respond [[4535]] Trial name: Rebif Rebidose study (press release 3 January 2013) [[4437]] Phase: Phase IIIb, open-label study [[4437]] Study Design: Company-sponsored, multicenter, open-label, single-arm study to evaluate the ease of use of Rebif Rebidose, a single-use auto-injector for the self-administration of interferon beta-1a, in patients who had received Rebif therapy (44 microg, 3 times per week) for at least 12 weeks and who continued such therapy using Rebif Redidose for the duration of the study, with the primary endpoint the proportion of patients who rated Rebif Rebidose as "easy to use" or "very easy to use" [[4437]] Disease Stage: Relapsing MS [[4437]] Enrollment/Number of Patients: 109 [[4437]] Duration: 12 weeks [[4437]] Status/Outcome: The majority of patients reported that this formulation was easy to use [[4437]] Trial name: Zivadinov et al., Neurol. Res., October 2012 study [[3132]] Phase: Observational study [[3132]] Study Design: Longitudinal study to prospectively evaluate the associations between baseline serum anti-phospholipid antibody (APLA) and the evolution of MS in patients who had received intramuscular interferon beta-1a for at least three years and remained on this treatment during the course of the study [[3132]] Disease Stage: RRMS [[3132]] Enrollment/Number of Patients: 47, with 26 APLA-positive and 21 APLA-negative [[3132]] Duration: 3 years [[3132]] Status/Outcome: APLA-positive patients who are treated with interferon beta-1a appear to display more clinical deterioration than APLA-negative patients who are treated with interferon beta-1a [[3132]] Trial name: Portaccio et al., Eur. J. Neurol., October 2012 study [[3453]] Phase: Pilot study [[3453]] Study Design: Prospective, non-randomized, pilot study to examine the possible benefits of natalizumab versus interferon beta on cognitive changes [[3453]] Disease Stage: RRMS [[3453]] Enrollment/Number of Patients: 26; 12 were treated with natalizumab and 14 with interferon beta [[3453]] Duration: 1.5 years (mean follow-up time) [[3453]] Status/Outcome: Natalizumab treatment was associated with a significantly lower mean number of neuropsychological tests that indicated deteriorating performance, and a significantly lower percentage brain volume change, than was interferon beta treatment, suggesting that natalizumab might help cognitive function by reducing brain atrophy [[3453]] Trial name: Lu et al., Neurology, Aug 2012 study [[2959]] Phase: Retrospective literature review [[2959]] Study Design: Systematic review of the literature for information about the effects of interferon beta, glatiramer acetate, or natalizumab on the offspring of MS patients who used these disease-modifying drugs (DMDs) during pregnancy [[2959]] Disease Stage: MS [[2959]] Enrollment/Number of Patients: 761 interferon beta-exposed pregnancies were identified [[2959]] Duration: N/A Status/Outcome: Interferon beta exposure during pregnancy was associated with preterm birth and lower mean birth weight and length, but not with low birth weight (<2500 g), cesarean delivery, spontaneous abortion, or congenital anomalies; discontinuing DMD use before conception continues to be recommended [[2959]] Trial name: Shirani et al., JAMA, July 2012 study [[2485]] Phase: Retrospective cohort study [[2485]] Study Design: Retrospective cohort study, based on prospectively collected data, to compare the effects of interferon beta (-1a or -1b) versus placebo on the progression to disability, such that the main outcome measure was time from eligibility for treatment with interferon beta to a confirmed sustained score of 6 on the Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) [[2485]] Disease Stage: RRMS Enrollment/Number of Patients: 2656 [868 treated with interferon beta (from 1995 to 2004), 829 untreated (who met criteria to receive interferon beta in that time period), 959 from historical cohorts (who met the same criteria before interferon beta therapies were available)] [[2485]] Duration: N/A [[2485]] Status/Outcome: Interferon beta was not associated with a reduction in the progression of disability, such that 10.8% of patients in the treated group, 5.3% in the contemporary untreated group, and 23.1% in the historical untreated group reached an EDSS score of 6 [[2485]] Trial name: Roskell et al., Curr. Med. Res. Opin., May 2012 study [[3359]] Phase: Retrospective trial review [[3359]] Study Design: Meta-analysis of placebo-controlled and head-to-head trials, which evaluated the effects of one or more drugs (fingolimod, interferon beta-1a, interferon beta-1b, and/or glatiramer acetate), to compare the effects of fingolimod versus the other treatments on the annualized relapse rate (ARR) [[3359]] Disease Stage: RRMS [[3359]] Enrollment/Number of Patients: N/A [[3359]] Duration: N/A [[3359]] Status/Outcome: Meta-analyses indicated that fingolimod significantly reduced the ARR as compared to the other drugs; the relative ARRs for each drug versus fingolimod were 1.43 (glatiramer acetate, 20 mg dose), 1.51 (interferon beta-1b, 250 microg dose), 1.55 (interferon beta-1a, 44 microg dose), 1.67 (interferon beta-1a, 22 microg dose), 1.93 (interferon beta-1a, 30 microg dose), and 2.32 (placebo) [[3359]] Trial name: Del Santo et al., Eur. J. Clin. Pharmacol., April 2012 study [[2482]] Phase: Retrospective trial review [[2482]] Study Design: Review of 10 randomized trials that tested interferon, glatiramer acetate, natalizumab, or fingolimod in RRMS, such that the relapse-free rates at 12 months were compared, either directly or through network meta-analysis [[2482]] Disease Stage: RRMS [[2482]] Enrollment/Number of Patients: N/A [[2482]] Duration: N/A [[2482]] Status/Outcome: Fingolimod was determined to have the most favorable profile with respect to relapse-free rate at the follow-up assessment at 1 year [[2482]] Trial name: Meca-Lallana et al., J. Neurol. Sci., April 2012 study [[4248]] Phase: Observational study [[4248]] Study Design: Observational, multicenter study to evaluate changes in spasticity after a switch from interferon beta to glatiramer acetate treatment, with the primary endpoint made up of changes in the Penn Spasm Frequency Scale, Modified Ashworth Scale, Adductor Tone Rating Scale, and Global Pain Score at 3 and 6 months after the switch [[4248]] Disease Stage: RMMS, with spasticity [[4248]] Enrollment/Number of Patients: 68 [[4248]] Duration: 6 months [[4248]] Status/Outcome: Switching to glatiramer acetate led to statistically significant improvement in spasm frequence, muscle tone, and pain after 3 and 6 months [[4248]] Trial name: La Mantia et al., Cochrane Database Syst. Rev., January 2012 study [[2320]]; similar analysis publ April 2013 [[3036]] Phase: Retrospective trial review [[2320]] Study Design: Results from five randomized, placebo-controlled trials (RTCs) were selected for further analysis after assessment of all RTCs that evaluated the efficacy of interferon beta-1a and -1b in SPMS; the goal was to determine whether interferon beta can safely reverse or slow SPMS [[2320]] Disease Stage: SPMS [[2320]] Enrollment/Number of Patients: 3122 patients contributed to the studies involved in the analysis [[2320]] Duration: Analyzed 3 years of treatment [[3036]] Status/Outcome: In SPMS, interferon beta was not observed to stop the development of permanent physical disability, but significantly reduced the risk of relapse and of short-term disability related to relapse [[2320]] Trial name: Khan et al., J. Neurol. Sci., January 2012 study [[3065]] Phase: Retrospective medical record review [[3065]] Study Design: Study to measure the effects of glatiramer acetate (20 mg, injected subcuraneously once a day; 121 patients), interferon beta-1a (30 mcg, injected intramuscularly once a week; 53 patients), and interferon beta-1b (250 mcg, injected subcutaneously every other day; 101 patients), with treatments given for five years, on the loss of brain volume in previously treatment-naïve patients with relatively early RRMS (of less than or equal to five years duration when the study began); patients received brain MRI scans on the same scanner with the same protocol at baseline and year 5 [[3065]] Disease Stage: RRMS [[3065]] Enrollment/Number of Patients: 275 [[3065]] Duration: 5 years [[3065]] Status/Outcome: The disease-modifying therapies were associated with an adjusted (for pseudoatrophy in the first year) percentage change in brain volume (PCBV) over five years of -2.27% (glatiramer acetate), -2.62% (interferon beta-1a), and -3.21% (interferon beta-1b), which were all significantly reduced as compared to the PCBV (-4.75%) for 34 patients who were untreated for 8 to 24 months [[3065]] Trial name: CAMMS223 post-hoc and subset analysis (publ 2011) [[448]] [[422]] Phase: Additional data analysis for Phase II study [[422]] Study Design: Post-hoc and subset analysis of a trial comparing the efficacy of an annual infusion of alemtuzumab (12 mg or 24 mg) to thrice-weekly subcutaneous interferon beta-1a (44 micrograms) [[448]] [[422]] Disease Stage: RRMS [[422]] Enrollment/Number of Patients: 334 [[422]] Duration: 2 years [[422]] Status/Outcome: The drug benefited patients equally in all subgroups of CAMMS223 cohort studied, including age, sex, geographical region, MRI-T1 brain volume, MRI-T2 lesion volume, disease duration, number of previous relapses within 2 years, and EDSS [[422]] Trial name: CAMMS223 extension study (reported 2010) [[788]] Phase: Extension of phase II study [[788]] Study Design: Open-label 2-year extension of a trial comparing the efficacy of an annual infusion of alemtuzumab (12 mg or 24 mg) to thrice-weekly subcutaneous interferon beta-1a (44 micrograms) [[422]] [[788]] Disease Stage: RRMS [[788]] Enrollment/Number of Patients: Not noted [[788]] Duration: Four year follow-up [[788]] Status/Outcome: 71% of treated patients remained disease-free up to three years after last treatment, compared to 35% on interferon beta-1a; 91% of treated patients had no sustained accumulation of disease, compared to 68% on interferon beta-1a; 77% of treated patients were relapse-free, compared to 49% on interferon beta-1a [[788]] Trial name: Bermel et al., Mult. Scler., Feb 2010 study [[1076]] [[1084]] Phase: Extension study [[1076]] Study Design: Open-label, 15-year follow-up of interferon beta-1a use (intramuscular) to determine long-term tolerability and efficacy using patient self-report questionnaires [[1076]] Disease Stage: RRMS [[1076]] Enrollment/Number of Patients: 136 out of 172 eligible patients [[1076]] Duration: 15 years [[1076]] Status/Outcome: Patients on long-term therapy had less disability and a better quality of life as compared with patients who stopped using the therapy after the original trial [[1076]] Trial name: Long-term follow-up for PRISMS study (publ 2006) [[1077]] [[1083]] Phase: Extension study [[1077]] Study Design: Open-label eight-year follow-up of interferon beta-1a (subcutaneous) use to determine the long-term tolerability and efficacy on the basis of Expanded Disability Status Scale, relapse rate, and T2 lesion burden [[1077]] Disease Stage: RRMS [[1077]] Enrollment/Number of Patients: 382 out of the 560 originally-enrolled patients [[1077]] Duration: 8 years [[1077]] Status/Outcome: Results supported long-term use; a stronger effect was observed at higher dose; 19.7 % of patients progressed to secondary progressive MS [[1077]] |
| Interferon beta-1b |
Trial name: Betaferon in Newly Emerging Multiple Sclerosis for Initial Treatment (BENEFIT) (publ 2006) [[1131]] [[1137]] Phase: Phase III trial [[1131]] [[1137]] Study Design: Multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial to determine the effects of interferon beta-1b (250 microg, given subcutaneously every other day) on delaying conversion to clinically definite MS [[1137]] Disease Stage: CIS [[1137]] Enrollment/Number of Patients: 468 [[1137]] Duration: 2 years, or until MS was diagnosed [[1137]] Status/Outcome: Drug reduced the risk of conversion to clinically definite MS (from 45% in the placebo group to 28% in the interferon beta-1b group) [[1131]] [[1137]] Trial name: Barkhof et al., Arch. Neurol., September 2007 trial [[1142]] Phase: Phase III trial [[1142]] Study Design: Industry-sponsored, double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized, parallel-group, multicenter study to examine detailed MRI findings from participants in the BENEFIT trial, in which patients received interferon beta-1b (250 microg, given subcutaneously every other day) or placebo [[1137]] [[1142]] Disease Stage: CIS [[1142]] Enrollment/Number of Patients: 404 [[1142]] Duration: 2 years, or until MS was diagnosed [[1142]] Status/Outcome: Drug was associated with a 60% relative reduction in the median cumulative number of newly active lesions (2 versus 5), with lower cumulative numbers of new T2 lesions (1 versus 3) and new gadolinium-enhancing lesions (0 versus 1) [[1131]] [[1142]] Trial name: Panitch et al., Neurology, November 2004 (North American SPMS) trial [[1141]] Phase: Phase III trial [[1141]] Study Design: Multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized trial to test the effects of interferon beta-1b (250 microg or 160 microg per m2 of body surface area, given subcutaneously every other day) on time to progression [at least 1.0 point increase on the Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS), or 0.5 point increase if the baseline was 6.0 or 6.5] (primary outcome) and on mean change in EDSS score, measures related to relapse, MRI activity, and results of a neuropsychological test (secondary outcomes) [[1141]] Disease Stage: SPMS [[1141]] Enrollment/Number of Patients: 939 [[1141]] Duration: 3 years [[1141]] Status/Outcome: Drug (at either dose) was not associated with a significant change in the time to confirmed progression of EDSS scores, but both doses were associated with benefits to relapse- and MRI-related measures [[1141]]; retrospective combined analyses of the results of the European SPMS trial (1998) and the North American SPMS trial (2004) to determine reasons for the discrepancy in outcomes determined that the the European SPMS trial included patients with an earlier stage of SPMS and with more active disease, which might be relevant to the different results of the two studies [[1140]] [[1141]] [[1192]] Trial name: European Study Group, Lancet, November 1998 (European SPMS) trial [[1140]] Phase: Phase III trial [[1140]] Study Design: Multicenter, double-masked, randomized, placebo-controlled trial to test the effects of interferon beta-1b [8 million IU (250 microg), given subcutaneously every other day] on the time to confirmed progression of disability [1.0 point increase on the Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS), or a 0.5 point increase if the baseline was 6.0 or 6.5] [[1131]] [[1140]] Disease Stage: SPMS [[1140]] Enrollment/Number of Patients: 718, with 661 undergoing followup [[1140]] Duration: 2 to 3 years [[1140]] Status/Outcome: Drug was associated with a reduced time to confirmed progression of disability, such that disability was delayed by 9 to 12 months during the study period of 2 to 3 years [[1140]]; retrospective combined analyses of the results of the European SPMS trial (1998) and the North American SPMS trial (2004) to determine reasons for the discrepancy in outcomes determined that the the European SPMS trial included patients with an earlier stage of SPMS and with more active disease, which might be relevant to the different results of the two studies [[1140]] [[1141]] [[1192]] Trial name: The IFNB Multiple Sclerosis Study Group, Neurology, April 1993 trial [[1136]] Phase: Phase II trial [[1136]] Study Design: Multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial to test the effects of interferon beta-1b (50 microg or 250 microg, administered subcutaneously every other day) on the annual exacerbation rate and on the proportion of exacerbation-free patients (primary endpoints) [[1131]] [[1136]] Disease Stage: RRMS [[1136]] Enrollment/Number of Patients: 372, with efficacy analysis based on data from 338 [[1131]] [[1136]] Duration: 2 years [[1136]] Status/Outcome: 250 microg interferon beta-1b was associated with a lower annual exacerbation rate (0.84) than was 50 microg interferon beta-1b (1.17) or placebo (1.27); a larger fraction of patients in the 250 microg group (31%) were exacerbation free at 2 years as compared to those in the 50 microg group (21%) or placebo group (16%); the 250 microg dose significantly reduced the median time to first relapse; the 250 microg dose also reduced the number of new lesions per year and MRI-detected burden of disease (in a cohort of 52 patients undergoing frequent MRIs) [[1131]] [[1136]] [[1156]] Trial name: The IFNB Multiple Sclerosis Study Group and The University of British Columbia MS/MRI Analysis Group, Neurology, July 1995 trial (extension of IFNB 1993 trial) [[1136]] [[1157]] Phase: Phase II trial [[1157]] Study Design: Double-blind extension of a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial to test the effects of interferon beta-1b (50 microg or 250 microg, administered subcutaneously every other day) on the exacerbation rate and the MRI burden of disease [[1136]] [[1157]] Disease Stage: RRMS [[1136]] [[1157]] Enrollment/Number of Patients: 372 in original study, with 218 completing this study [[1157]] Duration: 5 years [[1157]] Status/Outcome: 250 microg interferon beta-1b caused a one-third reduction in the annual exacerbation rate compared to placebo in each of 5 years, but the difference was not statistically significant after the second year [[1136]] [[1157]] Trial name: Knobler et al., J. Interferon Res., October 1993 study [[1159]] Phase: Pilot study [[1159]] Study Design: Placebo-controlled pilot study to test the safety and determine the side effects of recombinant human interferon beta-1b, in which patients were treated with interferon beta-1b [0.8, 4, 8, or 16 million units (mU), given subcutaneously 3 times per week] or placebo [[1159]] Disease Stage: RRMS [[1159]] Enrollment/Number of Patients: 30 enrolled; 15 patients remained in the study for over 6 years [[1159]] Duration: 6 years [[1159]] Status/Outcome: Dose-related trend in reduction of the exacerbation frequency was seen and the 8 mU dose was selected for further study at 24 weeks (such that 15 patients received the 8 mU dose for over 6 years); side effects decreased over time [[1159]] |
Trial name: BEtaseron vs COpaxone in Multiple Sclerosis with Triple-Dose Gadolinium and 3-Tesla MRI Endpoints (BECOME) (publ 2009) [[365]] Phase: Phase IV trial [[956]] Study Design: Trial to compare the ability of interferon beta-1b and glatiramer acetate to suppress signs of disease activity (primary outcome, number of combined active lesions per patient per scan in first year) as measured by monthly brain MRI [[365]] Disease Stage: CIS or RRMS [[365]] Enrollment/Number of Patients: 75 [[365]] Duration: Up to 2 years [[365]] Status/Outcome: Patients taking either interferon beta-1b or glatiramer acetate showed similar numbers of combined active lesions per patient for first year (primary outcome) and similar numbers of relapses for 2 years [[365]] Trial name: Betaferon Efficiency Yielding Outcomes of a New Dose (BEYOND) (publ 2009) [[362]] Phase: Phase III trial [[957]] Study Design: Multicenter, randomized, prospective study to compare the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of interferon beta-1b (250 or 500 microg every other day) and glatiramer acetate (20 mg per day) (primary outcome, relapse risk) [[362]] Disease Stage: RRMS [[362]] Enrollment/Number of Patients: 2447 [[362]] Duration: 2.0 to 3.5 years [[362]] Status/Outcome: Relapse risk, expanded disability status scale progression, and T1-hypointense lesion volume were similar among all treatment groups [[362]] Trial name: Etemadifar et al., Acta Neurol. Scand., May 2006 trial [[1158]] Phase: Phase IV/Postmarketing trial [[1158]] Study Design: Randomized, single-blind trial to compare the effects of interferon beta-1b (subcutaneous injection), interferon beta-1a (intramuscular injection), and interferon beta-1a (subcutaneous injection) [[1179]] [[1158]] Disease Stage: RRMS [[1158]] Enrollment/Number of Patients: 90 [[1158]] Duration: 2 years [[1158]] Status/Outcome: In the interferon beta-1b group, 43.3% of the patients remained relapse-free, as compared to 56.7% in the interferon beta-1a (subcutaneous) and 20% in the interferon beta-1a (intramuscular) groups; the Expanded Disability Status Scale score decreased in the interferon beta-1b and interferon beta-1a (subcutaneous) groups, but remained stable in the interferon beta-1a (intramuscular) group [[1158]] Trial name: Koch-Henriksen et al., Neurology, April 2006 trial [[1086]] Phase: Phase IV/Postmarketing trial [[1086]] Study Design: Multicenter, controlled, open-label, randomized, head-to-head trial to compare the effects of interferon beta-1a (22 microg administered subcutaneously once a week) versus interferon beta-1b (250 microg administered subcutaneously every other day) on the annualized relapse rate and the time to first relapse (primary endpoints) and the time to sustained progression (secondary endpoint) [[1131]] [[1138]] Disease Stage: RRMS [[1086]] Enrollment/Number of Patients: 301 [[1086]] Duration: 2 years [[1131]] [[1086]] Status/Outcome: Both drug regimes were associated with virtually equal annual relapse rates (0.70 for interferon beta-1a; 0.71 for interferon beta-1b), times to first relapse, and time to sustained progression [[1086]] Trial name: INdependent COMparison of INterferon (INCOMIN) (publ 2002) [[1138]] Phase: Phase IV/Postmarketing trial [[1138]] Study Design: Prospective, randomized, open-label multicenter study to compare the effects of two different interferon beta preparations and dosing schedules [interferon beta-1a (30 microg administered intramuscularly once a week) versus interferon beta-1b (250 microg administered subcutaneously on alternate days)] on the proportion of patients free from relapses and free from new T2 lesions (primary outcome measures) [[1131]] [[1138]] [[1179]] Disease Stage: RRMS [[1138]] Enrollment/Number of Patients: 188 [[1138]] Duration: 2 years [[1138]] Status/Outcome: The interferon beta-1b regime was more effective than the interferon beta-1a regime; the proportion of patients who remained relapse free over 2 years was 51% for interferon beta-1b versus 36% for interferon beta-1a and the proportion of patients who remained free from new T2 lesions was 55% for interferon beta-1b versus 26% for interferon beta-1a [[1138]] |
Trial name: Jokubaitis et al., PLoS One, March 2013 study [[5370]] Phase: Prospective cohort study [[5370]] Study Design: Multicenter Australian cohort study using the MSBase platform to characterize use of disease-modifying therapies (DMTs, which included interferon beta, glatiramer acetate, and natalizumab); specifically, treatment persistence, factors that predict treatment discontinuation, and rates of switching between DMTs were studied [[5370]] Disease Stage: RRMS [[5370]] Enrollment/Number of Patients: 1113 [[5370]] Duration: 4.2 years (median time patients were followed) [[5370]] Status/Outcome: Treatment persistence in this study was short, such that patients remained on their first DMT for 2.5 years (median) and on their next DMT for 2.3 years; annualized switch or cessation rates were 9.5 to 12.5% (interferon beta), 11.6% (glatiramer acetate), and 4.4% (natalizumab); younger age and higher disability scores predicted DMT discontinuation [[5370]] Trial name: Comparison of Patients Treated with Natalizumab and Interferon-Beta/Glatiramer Using Propensity-Matched Multiple Sclerosis Registry Data (press release, 18 March 2013) [[5315]] Phase: Retrospective medical record review [[5315]] Study Design: Data from two MS patient registries [TYSABRI Observational Program (TOP) and MSCOMET] were used in a propensity-matched analysis to compare the effects of natalizumab, interferon beta, and glatiramer acetate on relapses [[5315]] Disease Stage: MS [[5315]] Enrollment/Number of Patients: N/A [[5315]] Duration: N/A [[5315]] Status/Outcome: Natalizumab was associated with a lower rate of first relapse as compared to interferon beta and glatiramer acetate; relapses in patients treated with natalizumab also occurred more slowly than in those treated with the other drugs [[5315]] Trial name: Romeo et al., Eur. J. Neurol., February 2013 study [[5033]] Phase: Observational/open-label study [[5033]] Study Design: Observational study to determine clinical- and MRI-based predictors of response to glatiramer acetate and interferon beta; patients were considered "responders" if clinical and MRI activity were absent during treatment and "non-responders" in the presence of MRI activity or if the reduction in annualized relapse rate (ARR) was <50% of the ARR in the 2 previous years [[5033]] Disease Stage: RRMS [[5033]] Enrollment/Number of Patients: 594 [[5033]] Duration: 2 years [[5033]] Status/Outcome: Later age at disease onset, a lower level of disability, and a lower number of gadolinium-enhancing lesions at baseline were predictors of response, on the basis of a multivariate analysis [[5033]] Trial name: Brandes et al., J. Med. Econ., February 2013 study [[4902]] Phase: Observational study [[4902]] Study Design: Analysis to assess the effect of real-world adherence (estimated from a study of a single claims database of a national pharmacy benefit manager) on the cost-effectiveness (the cost per avoided relapse) of fingolimod, subcutaneous interferon beta-1b (Extavia or Betaseron) and interferon beta-1a, glatiramer acetate, and intramuscular interferon beta-1a [[4902]] Disease Stage: MS [[4902]] Enrollment/Number of Patients: N/A [[4902]] Duration: N/A [[4902]] Status/Outcome: Costs per relapse avoided were estimated at $90,566 (fingolimod), $127,024 (Extavia), $137,492 (Betaseron), $144,016 (subcutaneous inferferon beta-1a), $160,314 (glatiramer acetate), and $312,629 (intramuscular interferon beta-1a) [[4902]] Trial name: Portaccio et al., Eur. J. Neurol., October 2012 study [[3453]] Phase: Pilot study [[3453]] Study Design: Prospective, non-randomized, pilot study to examine the possible benefits of natalizumab versus interferon beta on cognitive changes [[3453]] Disease Stage: RRMS [[3453]] Enrollment/Number of Patients: 26; 12 were treated with natalizumab and 14 with interferon beta [[3453]] Duration: 1.5 years (mean follow-up time) [[3453]] Status/Outcome: Natalizumab treatment was associated with a significantly lower mean number of neuropsychological tests that indicated deteriorating performance, and a significantly lower percentage brain volume change, than was interferon beta treatment, suggesting that natalizumab might help cognitive function by reducing brain atrophy [[3453]] Trial name: Dhib-Jalbut et al., J. Neuroimmunol., September 2012 study [[3247]] Phase: Phase IV study [[3247]] Study Design: Part of a larger, open-label, multicenter, prospective, observational Phase IV clinical study (titled Success of Titration, analgesics, and BETA nurse support on Acceptance Rates to early MS Treatment with Betaseron®, or START); this particular analysis looked for correlations between the response to interferon beta-1b and immune markers [[3247]] Disease Stage: CIS and RRMS [[3247]] Enrollment/Number of Patients: 32 enrolled; 30 were treated [[3247]] Duration: 12 months [[3247]] Status/Outcome: At month 6, interleukin-17 levels were higher in relapsing versus relapse-free patients; at month 3, brain-derived neurotrophic factor levels were higher in relapse-free versus relapsing patients; furthermore, changes in interleukin-4 levels inversely correlated with disability score and changes in the interleukin-10/interferon-gamma ratio inversely correlated with relapse occurrence [[3247]] Trial name: Jacques et al., Mult. Scler. Int., August 2012 study [[3084]] Phase: Phase IIa pilot study [[3084]] Study Design: Randomized, open-label, multicenter, two-arm pilot study to evaluate the safety and tolerability of a combination of the immunosuppressant tacrolimus [orally two times per day at a dose to reach either low (1-5 ng/ml) or high (5-10 ng/ml) blood levels] with interferon beta-1b therapy (250 microg given subcutaneously every other day); the idea is to target more than one autoimmune process by using two drugs [[3084]] Disease Stage: RRMS and SPMS [[3084]] Enrollment/Number of Patients: 25 [[3084]] Duration: 38 weeks [[3084]] Status/Outcome: Combination therapy appeared to be safe and well tolerated [[3084]] Trial name: Lu et al., Neurology, August 2012 study [[2959]] Phase: Retrospective literature review [[2959]] Study Design: Systematic review of the literature for information about the effects of interferon beta, glatiramer acetate, or natalizumab on the offspring of MS patients who used these disease-modifying drugs (DMDs) during pregnancy [[2959]] Disease Stage: MS [[2959]] Enrollment/Number of Patients: 761 interferon beta-exposed pregnancies were identified [[2959]] Duration: N/A [[2959]] Status/Outcome: Interferon beta exposure during pregnancy was associated with preterm birth and lower mean birth weight and length, but not with low birth weight (<2500 g), cesarean delivery, spontaneous abortion, or congenital anomalies; discontinuing DMD use before conception continues to be recommended [[2959]] Trial name: Shirani et al., JAMA, July 2012 study [[2485]] Phase: Retrospective cohort study [[2485]] Study Design: Retrospective cohort study, based on prospectively collected data, to compare the effects of interferon beta (-1a or -1b) versus placebo on the progression to disability, such that the main outcome measure was time from eligibility for treatment with interferon beta to a confirmed sustained score of 6 on the Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) [[2485]] Disease Stage: RRMS [[2485]] Enrollment/Number of Patients: 2656 [868 treated with interferon beta (from 1995 to 2004), 829 untreated (who met criteria to receive interferon beta in that time period), 959 from historical cohorts (who met the same criteria before interferon beta therapies were available)] [[2485]] Duration: N/A [[2485]] Status/Outcome: Interferon beta was not associated with a reduction in the progression of disability, such that 10.8% of patients in the treated group, 5.3% in the contemporary untreated group, and 23.1% in the historical untreated group reached an EDSS score of 6 [[2485]] Trial name: Roskell et al., Curr. Med. Res. Opin., May 2012 study [[3359]] Phase: Retrospective trial review [[3359]] Study Design: Meta-analysis of placebo-controlled and head-to-head trials, which evaluated the effects of one or more drugs (fingolimod, interferon beta-1a, interferon beta-1b, and/or glatiramer acetate), to compare the effects of fingolimod versus the other treatments on the annualized relapse rate (ARR) [[3359]] Disease Stage: RRMS [[3359]] Enrollment/Number of Patients: N/A [[3359]] Duration: N/A [[3359]] Status/Outcome: Meta-analyses indicated that fingolimod significantly reduced the ARR as compared to the other drugs; the relative ARRs for each drug versus fingolimod were 1.43 (glatiramer acetate, 20 mg dose), 1.51 (interferon beta-1b, 250 microg dose), 1.55 (interferon beta-1a, 44 microg dose), 1.67 (interferon beta-1a, 22 microg dose), 1.93 (interferon beta-1a, 30 microg dose), and 2.32 (placebo) [[3359]] Trial name: Del Santo et al., Eur. J. Clin. Pharmacol., April 2012 study [[2482]] Phase: Retrospective trial review [[2482]] Study Design: Review of 10 randomized trials that tested interferon, glatiramer acetate, natalizumab, or fingolimod in RRMS, such that the relapse-free rates at 12 months were compared, either directly or through network meta-analysis [[2482]] Disease Stage: RRMS [[2482]] Enrollment/Number of Patients: N/A [[2482]] Duration: N/A [[2482]] Status/Outcome: Fingolimod was determined to have the most favorable profile with respect to relapse-free rate at the follow-up assessment at 1 year [[2482]] Trial name: Basiri et al., Acta Med. Iran, 2012 study [[1427]] Phase: Open-label study [[1427]] Study Design: Open-label study to evaluate the effectiveness and tolerability of interferon beta in patients younger than 16 years; patients were treated with either interferon beta-1a (30 microg, intramuscularly once a week) or interferon beta-1b (250 microg, subcutaneously every other day) [[1427]] Disease Stage: RRMS [[1427]] Enrollment/Number of Patients: 13 [[1427]] Duration: 9 months [[1427]] Status/Outcome: Use of interferon beta appears safe in pediatric patients over the short term; drugs were also associated with a decrease in the expanded disability status scale score [[1427]] Trial name: Goodin et al., Neurology, April 2012 study [[1389]] Phase: Observational study [[1389]] Study Design: Randomized, long-term cohort study to compare all-cause mortality over 21 years between patients who received either 250 microg interferon beta-1b (administered subcutaneously every other day for up to 5 years) or placebo in a pivotal interferon beta-1b trial published in 1993/1995 [[1136]] [[1389]] Disease Stage: RRMS [[1389]] Enrollment/Number of Patients: 366 (of the 372 who were originally enrolled) [[1389]] Duration: 21 years (time from enrollment in the original trial to present analysis) [[1389]] Status/Outcome: Patients who were originally randomly assigned to 250 microg interferon beta-1b had a significant reduction in all-cause mortality over 21 years as compared with those receiving placebo, such that the hazard rate of death was reduced 46.8% among the treated patients [[1389]]; additional cost-effectiveness analyses indicate that early treatment with interferon beta-1b increases quality-adjusted life-years and is probably a cost-effective therapy for MS [[2860]]; additional analyses showed that the excessive deaths among patients who received placebo during the original randomized controlled trial were primarily related to MS, particularly MS-related pulmonary infections (81 deaths had been recorded among the 366 patients; the cause of death and/or its relationship to MS were determined for 71/81 of the deaths) [[4083]] Trial name: Meca-Lallana et al., J. Neurol. Sci., April 2012 study [[4248]] Phase: Observational study [[4248]] Study Design: Observational, multicenter study to evaluate changes in spasticity after a switch from interferon beta to glatiramer acetate treatment, with the primary endpoint made up of changes in the Penn Spasm Frequency Scale, Modified Ashworth Scale, Adductor Tone Rating Scale, and Global Pain Score at 3 and 6 months after the switch [[4248]] Disease Stage: RMMS, with spasticity [[4248]] Enrollment/Number of Patients: 68 [[4248]] Duration: 6 months [[4248]] Status/Outcome: Switching to glatiramer acetate led to statistically significant improvement in spasm frequence, muscle tone, and pain after 3 and 6 months [[4248]] Trial name: Goodin et al., J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry, March 2012 study [[763]] Phase: Observational study [[763]] Study Design: Industry-sponsored, cross-sectional, observational, cohort study to evaluate the long-term benefit of interferon beta-1b therapy in patients who participated in a pivotal interferon beta-1b trial published in 1993/1995 (involving 50 microg or 250 microg interferon beta-1b, administered subcutaneously every other day for up to 5 years), such that treatment and disease status after 16 years was assessed, but interferon beta-1b was not administered as part of this study [[1136]] [[1157]] [[763]] [[1173]] Disease Stage: RRMS [[1173]] Enrollment/Number of Patients: 432 [[1173]] Duration: 16 years [[763]] Status/Outcome: Physical and cognitive outcomes after 16 years correlated with baseline disability; physical outcome but not cognition correlated with disability accrual and annualized relapse rates during the randomised controlled trial, whereas cognitive but not physical outcomes correlated with baseline measures of lesion burden and atrophy as measured by MRI; given that better correlations were seen for several baseline measures, long term outcomes might be determined mostly early during the course of the disease [[763]] Trial name: La Mantia et al., Cochrane Database Syst. Rev., January 2012 study [[2320]]; similar analysis publ April 2013 [[3036]] Phase: Retrospective trial review [[2320]] Study Design: Results from five randomized, placebo-controlled trials (RTCs) were selected for further analysis after assessment of all RTCs that evaluated the efficacy of interferon beta-1a and -1b in SPMS; the goal was to determine whether interferon beta can safely reverse or slow SPMS [[2320]] Disease Stage: SPMS [[2320]] Enrollment/Number of Patients: 3122 patients contributed to the studies involved in the analysis [[2320]] Duration: Analyzed 3 years of treatment [[3036]] Status/Outcome: In SPMS, interferon beta was not observed to stop the development of permanent physical disability, but significantly reduced the risk of relapse and of short-term disability related to relapse [[2320]] Trial name: Khan et al., J. Neurol. Sci., January 2012 study [[3065]] Phase: Retrospective medical record review [[3065]] Study Design: Study to measure the effects of glatiramer acetate (20 mg, injected subcuraneously once a day; 121 patients), interferon beta-1a (30 mcg, injected intramuscularly once a week; 53 patients), and interferon beta-1b (250 mcg, injected subcutaneously every other day; 101 patients), with treatments given for five years, on the loss of brain volume in previously treatment-naïve patients with relatively early RRMS (of less than or equal to five years duration when the study began); patients received brain MRI scans on the same scanner with the same protocol at baseline and year 5 [[3065]] Disease Stage: RRMS [[3065]] Enrollment/Number of Patients: 275 [[3065]] Duration: 5 years [[3065]] Status/Outcome: The disease-modifying therapies were associated with an adjusted (for pseudoatrophy in the first year) percentage change in brain volume (PCBV) over five years of -2.27% (glatiramer acetate), -2.62% (interferon beta-1a), and -3.21% (interferon beta-1b), which were all significantly reduced as compared to the PCBV (-4.75%) for 34 patients who were untreated for 8 to 24 months [[3065]] Trial name: Garcia-Montojo et al., Eur. J. Neurol., Aug 2011 study [[1840]] Phase: Observational study [[1840]] Study Design: Observational, multicentric study to evaluate whether the efficacy of interferon beta-1b in MS might be related to its antiviral properties, as assessed by its effect on human herpes virus 6 (HHV-6) and Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) [[1840]] Disease Stage: MS [[1840]] Enrollment/Number of Patients: 54 [[1840]] Duration: 24 months [[1840]] Status/Outcome: The presence of HHV-6 in serum during treatment with interferon beta-1b was associated with a higher risk of severe relapse; no association was found between EBV and various clinical measures [[1840]] Trial name: Reder et al., Neurology, June 2010 study [[1133]] Phase: Observational study [[1133]] Study Design: Cross-sectional followup study to assess the long-term safety of interferon beta-1b in patients who participated in a pivotal interferon beta-1b trial published in 1993/1995 (involving 50 microg or 250 microg interferon beta-1b, administered subcutaneously every other day for up to 5 years), such that adverse events that occurred in the 16 years since the pivotal trial were recorded, but no particular therapy was stipulated as part of this study [[1133]] [[1136]] [[1157]] Disease Stage: RRMS [[1133]] Enrollment/Number of Patients: 328 [[1133]] Duration: 16 years [[1133]] Status/Outcome: Adverse events related to treatment (such as leukopenia and liver and thyroid dysfunction) were reported and in agreement with previously observed effects; no new interferon beta-1b-related adverse effects were seen; and a higher percentage of patients from the placebo group in the pivotal study had died (18.3%) than from the interferon beta-1b groups (8.3% for the 50 microg group and 5.4% for the 250 microg group), all of which support the long-term safety of this drug [[1133]] Trial name: Kappos et al., Lancet Neurol., November 2009 trial (active treatment extension of the BENEFIT trial) [[1137]] [[1143]] Phase: Phase III trial [[1143]] Study Design: Industry-sponsored, prospectively planned, open-label follow-up study to compare the effects of early versus delayed interferon beta-1b treatment on the time to clinically definite MS and on other measures such as disability progression; patients enrolled in the original trial received either interferon beta-1b (250 microg) or placebo, whereas all patients received interferon beta-1b in the extension (patients and study personnel remained unaware of the initial treatment group) [[1143]] Disease Stage: CIS (at the time the original BENEFIT trial began) [[1137]] [[1143]] Enrollment/Number of Patients: 468 enrolled in the BENEFIT trial; 358 completed the extension [[1143]] Duration: 5 years [[1143]] Status/Outcome: Early treatment with interferon beta-1b reduced the risk of conversion to clinically definite MS by 37% as compared to delayed treatment with interferon beta-1b, but early treatment did not change long-term disability outcomes; early treatment was, however, associated with more improvement in cognition [[1131]] [[1143]] Trial name: OPTimisation of Interferon for MS (OPTIMS) (publ 2008) [[1180]] Phase: Phase II trial [[1180]] Study Design: University-sponsored, prospective, multicenter, randomized trial to test the effects of a high dose of interferon beta-1b (375 microg, given subcutaneously every other day) as compared to the usual dose (250 microg, given subcutaneously every other day) in patients with a suboptimal response to the 250 microg dose; trial had a 6-month run-in phase (to identify suboptimal responders) when all participants received the 250 microg dose and a 6-month open-label clinical and blinded MRI follow-up in which suboptimal responders were randomized to the two doses, with the primary outcome the proportion of patients without MRI activity during months 9 to 12 [[1180]] [[1174]] Disease Stage: RRMS [[1180]] Enrollment/Number of Patients: 216 entered study; 76 suboptimal responders were included in the analysis [[1180]] Duration: 1 year [[1180]] Status/Outcome: 375 microg dose was more frequently associated with no new MRI activity during months 9 to 12 than the 250 microg dose (30/36 versus 16/40) [[1180]] |
| Laquinimod |
Trial name: CONCERTO (press releases, August 2012 and March 2013) [[2768]] [[5223]] Phase: Phase III trial [[2768]] Study Design: Company-sponsored, multinational, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial to evaluate the effects of laquinimod (either 0.6 mg or 1.2 mg oral dose, once daily) on confirmed disability progression as measured by the Expanded Disability Status Scale (primary outcome measure); the protocol has been granted a Special Protocol Assessment agreement by the US FDA [[2768]] [[5223]] Disease Stage: RRMS [[2768]] Enrollment/Number of Patients: Approximately 1800 [[2768]] Duration: 24 months [[2768]] Status/Outcome: Plans to initiate this trial have been announced (8 August 2012) [[2768]]; first patient enrolled (6 March 2013) [[5223]] Trial name: Safety and Efficacy of Orally Administered Laquinimod Versus Placebo for Treatment of Relapsing Remitting Multiple Sclerosis (ALLEGRO) (publ 2012) [[809]] [[883]] [[819]] [[820]] Phase: Phase III trial [[883]] Study Design: Company-sponsored, randomized, double-blind, multicenter, placebo-controlled study to test the effects of laquinimod (0.6 mg oral dose, once daily) on the relapse rate (primary outcome) and other secondary outcomes [[809]] [[883]] Disease Stage: RRMS [[883]] Enrollment/Number of Patients: 1106 [[883]] Duration: 2 years [[883]] Status/Outcome: Drug was associated with a 23% reduction in the annualized relapse rate (0.30 versus 0.39) and a reduction in the risk of confirmed disease progression (11.1% versus 15.7%) [[883]] [[819]] [[820]] Trial name: Comi et al., Lancet, June 2008 trial [[823]] Phase: Phase IIb trial [[823]] Study Design: Company-sponsored, randomized, double-blind, multicenter, placebo-controlled trial to test the effects of laquinimod (0.3 mg or 0.6 mg daily oral dose) on the number of brain lesions in the last four months of the study (primary outcome) [[823]] [[821]] Disease Stage: RRMS [[823]] Enrollment/Number of Patients: 306 [[823]] Duration: 36 weeks [[823]] Status/Outcome: Drug (0.6 mg per day) was associated with a 40.4% reduction in the mean cumulative number of gadolinium enhancing lesions, whereas the 0.3 mg dose was not associated with significant effects [[823]] Trial name: Polman et al., Neurology, March 2005 trial [[564]] Phase: Phase II trial [[564]] Study Design: Company-supported, randomized, double-blind, multicenter placebo-controlled trial to test the effects of laquinimod (0.3 mg or 0.1 mg as three tablets once daily) on the number of active brain lesions (primary outcome) [[564]] Disease Stage: RRMS or SPMS [[564]] Enrollment/Number of Patients: 209 [[564]] Duration: 24 weeks [[564]] Status/Outcome: Drug was associated with a 44% reduction in the mean cumulative number of active lesions (5.24 for the 0.3 mg dose versus 9.44 for placebo); no differences in relapses or disability were found between treatment groups [[564]] |
Trial name: Benefit-Risk Assessment of Avonex and Laquinimod (BRAVO) (press release August 2011) [[810]] [[811]] [[817]] Phase: Phase III trial [[810]] Study Design: Company-sponsored, randomized, multicenter, double-blind, parallel-group, placebo-controlled trial designed to compare the effects of a daily oral dose of laquinimod (0.6 mg) versus placebo and compare risk-benefit profiles of laquinimod and interferon beta-1a (Avonex) (30 mcg intramuscular injection once weekly); the number of confirmed relapses is the primary outcome measure and the accumulation of physical disability is a secondary outcome measure [[810]] Disease Stage: RRMS [[810]] Enrollment/Number of Patients: 1331 [[810]] Duration: 2 years [[810]] Status/Outcome: Laquinimod was associated with a significant reduction (21.3%) in the annualized relapse rate (this reduction only became apparent after an imbalance between the placebo and treatment groups in baseline MRI characteristics was corrected) as well as reductions in the risk of disability progression and in loss of brain volume, whereas interferon beta-1a reduced relapse rates but did not appear to reduce the progression of disability or the loss of brain volume; additional analyses are ongoing as of August 2011 [[810]] [[817]] |
Trial name: ALLEGRO extension study (conference report, March 2013) [[5362]] Phase: Extension of Phase III trial [[883]] [[5362]] Study Design: Company-sponsored, open-label extension study (in which all patients received laquinimod), which followed the 2-year double-blind ALLEGRO trial, to examine disability progression in patients who received a total of 36 months ("early-start") of laquinimod treatment versus those who only received laquinimod in the open-label phase ("delayed start") [[5362]] Disease Stage: RRMS [[5362]] Enrollment/Number of Patients: 839 (97% of the 864 who participated in the original study) began the extension phase and 735 have completed 1 year of the extension phase [[5362]] Duration: 1 year extension, 3 years total for the ALLEGRO trial [[5362]] Status/Outcome: Early-start patients displayed an 11.8% risk of confirmed disability progression as compared to 16.7% for delayed-start patients [[5362]] Trial name: Comi et al., Mult. Scler., November 2010 trial [[565]] Phase: Extension phase of Comi et al., Lancet, June 2008 trial [[823]] [[565]] Study Design: Company-sponsored, multinational, double-blind extension trial to determine if the findings from a previous Phase II trial, which examined the safety and efficacy of laquinimod, are sustainable; patients who received the 0.3 mg or 0.6 mg daily dose of laquinimod in the original study continued with the same dose and patients who received placebo in the original study were re-randomized to either the 0.3 mg or 0.6 mg dose [[565]] Disease Stage: RRMS [[565]] Enrollment/Number of Patients: 239 (from the previous Phase II trial), with 222 undergoing final scans [[565]] Duration: 36 weeks [[565]] Status/Outcome: Switching from placebo to the 0.3 mg or 0.6 mg dose was associated with a 52% decrease in the number of gadolinium-enhanced lesions; continuation of the 0.6 mg dose maintained the reduction in brain lesions seen in the original study [[565]] Trial name: An Open Label Extension of the LAQ/5062 and LAQ/5063 Studies to Assess the Long Term Safety and Tolerability of Laquinimod 0.6mg in RRMS Patients (ongoing as of February 13, 2012) [[808]] Phase: Extension phase of Comi et al., Lancet, June 2008 trial and Comi et al., Mult. Scler., November 2010 trial [[823]] [[808]] [[565]] Study Design: Company-sponsored, open-label extension trial to continue assessing the long-term safety and tolerability of laquinimod (primary outcome); all patients will receive 0.6 mg of oral laquinimod daily [[808]] Disease Stage: RRMS [[808]] Enrollment/Number of Patients: 211 (from the previous extension study) [[808]] [[565]] Duration: 3 years [[808]] Status/Outcome: Final data collection date for the primary outcome measure is December 2014; estimated study completion date is June 2015 [[808]] |
| Masitinib |
Trial name: Masitinib in Patients with Progressive or Relapse-Free Secondary Multiple Sclerosis [[1382]] Phase: Phase III [[1381]] [[1382]] Study Design: Company-sponsored, prospective, multicenter, randomized, placebo-controlled study examining the safety and efficacy of drug (6 mg/kg/day) judged by changes in multiple sclerosis functional composite score (primary outcome) [[1382]] Disease Stage: PPMS or SPMS [[1381]] [[1382]] Enrollment/Number of Patients: Estimated enrollment 450 patients [[1381]] [[1382]] Duration: 96 weeks [[1381]] [[1382]] Status/Outcome: Recruiting patients; results expected after December, 2014 [[1382]] Trial name: Masitinib in Patients with Primary Progressive Multiple Sclerosis (PPMS) or Relapse-Free Secondary Multiple Sclerosis (SPMS) (Published June 2012) [[1383]] [[2122]] Phase: Phase II [[1383]] [[2122]] Study Design: Company-sponsored, randomized, placebo-controlled trial testing the safety and efficacy of two doses of drug (3 mg/kg/day and 6 mg/kg/day) as measured by changes in multiple sclerosis functional composite (MSFC) score (primary outcome) [[1383]] [[2122]] Disease Stage: PPMS or SPMS [[1383]] [[2122]] Enrollment/Number of Patients: 35 patients [[1383]] [[2122]] Duration: 12 months [[1383]] [[2122]] Status/Outcome: Out of 35 patients, 27 received drug and 8 received placebo. Of those, 7/17 assessable patients – 41% -- reported clinical response to treatment, but the response was not statistically significant: the change in MSFC score was +103% +/- 189 (drug) versus -60% +/- 190 (placebo) at month 12. The drug was also associated with a higher incidence of more severe adverse events [[1383]] [[2122]] |
||
| Mitoxantrone |
Trial name: Hartung et al., Lancet, Dec 2002 trial [[515]] Phase: Phase III trial [[515]] Study Design: Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter trial to test the efficacy of mitoxantrone (5mg/m² or 12mg/m² intravenously every 3 months for 24 months), with the primary outcome a multivariate analysis of five clinical measures (change in expanded disability status scale, change in ambulation index, adjusted total number of treated relapses, time to first treated relapse, and change in standardised neurological status), comparing the 12mg/m² and placebo groups [[515]] Disease Stage: Worsening RRMS (also known as progressive relapsing MS) or SPMS [[515]] Enrollment/Number of Patients: 194 enrolled, with 184 in the final analysis [[515]] Duration: 2 years [[515]] Status/Outcome: Drug (12mg/m² dose) was associated with an overall benefit in the multivariate analysis of five clinical measures (0.30 difference overall) [[515]] Trial name: Millefiorini et al., J. Neurol., Mar 1997 trial [[517]] Phase: Phase II trial [[517]] Study Design: Randomized, placebo-controlled, multicenter trial to determine the clinical efficacy of mitoxantrone (intravenous infusion of 8 mg/m² every month for 1 year), with the primary outcome disease progression and the secondary endpoints the growth and appearance of new brain lesions [[517]] Disease Stage: RRMS [[517]] Enrollment/Number of Patients: 51 enrolled, with 42 completing the MRI examinations [[517]] Duration: 2 years [[517]] Status/Outcome: Drug decreased the proportion of patients who showed confirmed disease progression, defined as a one point increase on the Kurtzke expanded disability scale (EDSS), but was not associated with a statistically significant benefit in the mean EDSS progression; drug reduced the mean number of brain lesions [[517]] |
Trial name: Edan et al., J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry, Dec 2011 trial [[509]] Phase: Phase IV trial [[509]] Study Design: Randomized, two-arm controlled trial to compare the effects of mitoxantrone [12 mg/m² (maximum 20 mg) monthly] combined with methylprednisolone (1 g intravenously each month for 6 months) followed 3 months later by interferon beta-1b (250 ug subcutaneously every other day for 27 months) or methylprednisolone (1 g intravenously each month during the first 6 months) and interferon beta-1b (250 ug every other day for 36 months), with the primary endpoint the time to worsen by one point on the expanded disability status scale (confirmed at 3 months) and the secondary endpoints the relapse rate and accumulation of new lesions [[509]] Disease Stage: Aggressive RRMS [[509]] Enrollment/Number of Patients: 109 [[509]] Duration: 3 years [[509]] Status/Outcome: Mitoxantrone delayed disability by 18 months, as measured by the time to worsen by at least one point on the expanded disability status scale, and reduced the relapse rate, reduced the number of gadolinium-enhancing lesions, and slowed the accumulation of new T2 lesions [[509]] Trial name: Vollmer et al., Mult. Schler., June 2008 trial [[524]] Phase: Phase II trial [[919]][[524]] Study Design: Multicenter, randomized, single-blind trial to compare the effects of glatiramer acetate (daily subcutaneous injections of 20 mg for 15 months) alone or mitoxantrone (monthly 12 mg/m² infusions for 3 months) followed by glatiramer acetate (daily subcutaneous injections of 20 mg for 12 months), with the primary outcome measure the incidence of adverse events and the secondary measures the number of gadolinium-enhancing lesions, the number of confirmed relapses, and changes in the expanded disability status scale [[524]] Disease Stage: RRMS [[524]] Enrollment/Number of Patients: 40 [[524]] Duration: 15 months [[524]] Status/Outcome: Both treatments were well tolerated; combination therapy was associated with an 89% greater reduction in the number of gadolinium-enhancing lesions at 6 and 9 months, a 70% reduction at 12 and 15 months, and a reduction in the mean relapse rate as compared to glatiramer acetate alone [[524]][[525]] Trial name: Zipoli et al., J. Neurol. Sci., March 2008 study [[4494]] Phase: Open label comparative study [[4494]] Study Design: Study to compare the safety and efficacy of mitoxantrone (8 mg per square meter monthly for 3 months, then every 3 months to reach a dose of 120 mg per square meter) to that of cyclophosphamide (700 mg per square meter, monthly for 12 months and then bimonthly for another 24 months) [[4494]] Disease Stage: Active RRMS or SPMS [[4494]] Enrollment/Number of Patients: 153 [[4494]] Duration: Mean followup of 3.6 years [[4494]] Status/Outcome: No significant difference was seen between the time to first relapse in the two groups; time to disease progression was 3.8 years in the mitoxantrone group and 3.6 years in the cyclophosphamide group; discontinuation because of side effects occurred more frequently in the cyclophosphamide group, although both drug regimes were considered tolerable [[4494]] |
Trial name: Chanvillard et al., PLoS One, June 2012 study [[2379]] Phase: Open-label study [[2379]] Study Design: Prospective, monocentric, single-arm, open-label study (partly funded by industry) to analyze the effects of mitoxantrone on immunological parameters; the treatment regime was 12 mg per m2 of body surface area given intravenously every three months, up to a cumulative dose of 140 mg per m2, unless reductions were required because of side effects [[2379]] Disease Stage: SPMS [[2379]] Enrollment/Number of Patients: 19 patients were screened, 15 patients enrolled, and 12 patients completed the study [[2379]] Duration: 12 months [[2379]] Status/Outcome: Mitoxantrone persistently suppressed B cells, enriched neutrophils and immunomodulatory CD8(low) T cells, and promoted natural killer (NK) cell enrichment and NK cell maturation; the drug-induced NK cell maturation occurred only in patients who responded to treatment [[2379]] |
| Mycophenolate Mofetil |
Trial name: TIME-MS (Safety Study of Combination Therapy with Intramuscular Avonex and Oral CellCept in Patients with Multiple Sclerosis) (published in 2010) [[425]] [[599]] Phase: Phase II [[425]] [[599]] Study Design: A company-sponsored, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, trial to characterize the adverse events (primary endpoint) of combining CellCept with interferon beta-1a [[425]] [[599]] Disease Stage: RRMS [[425]] [[599]] Enrollment/Number of Patients: 24 treatment-naïve patients [[425]] [[599]] Duration: 1 year [[425]] [[599]] Status/Outcome: No differences between experimental and control groups in terms of patient-reported adverse events, MRI metrics, or laboratory abnormalities, and appeared to be a trend towards therapeutic effect [[425]] [[599]] |
Trial name: Frohman et al, Ther Adv Neurol Disord, 2010 [[424]] Phase: Pilot study [[424]] Study Design: Randomized, blinded, parallel-group, multicenter pilot trial comparing the reduction of cumulative mean number of lesions (primary outcome measure) promoted by CellCept versus interferon beta-1a [[424]] Disease Stage: RRMS [[424]] Enrollment/Number of Patients: Enrolled 35 previously untreated patients; 31 completed the trial [[424]] Duration: 6 months [[424]] Status/Outcome: Patients treated with CellCept showed a trend towards a lower accumulation of lesions compared to those treated with interferon beta-1a [[424]] |
Trial name: Michel et al., ECTRIMS abstract, 2011 study [[601]] Phase: Retrospective medical record review [[601]] Study Design: Multicenter, retrospective study of all patients treated with the mycophenolate mofetil at three French MS centers, including those who had previously received other immunosuppressive drugs and those who had not, to determine the drug’s efficacy as a monotherapy (judged by annualized relapse rate) [[601]] Disease Stage: Not noted [[601]] Enrollment/Number of Patients: 362 patients included, treatment was stopped in 126 patients [[601]] Duration: 23.7 +/- 20.3 months [[601]] Status/Outcome: Annualized relapse rate fell significantly after treatment, from 0.92 +/- 0.96 to 0.37 +/- 0.72 in previously untreated patients, and similarly with patients previously treated with immunosuppressive drugs; 10.2% of patients experienced adverse events [[601]] Trial name: Vermersch et al., Eur. J Neurol. 2007 trial [[453]] Phase: Pilot study [[453]] Study Design: Company-sponsored, open-label, single-center, non-randomized pilot study examining the effect on disease activity as measured by MRI (primary endpoint) and safety and tolerance of drug combined with interferon beta-1a [[453]] Disease Stage: RRMS [[453]] Enrollment/Number of Patients: 30 enrolled, 28 completed study [[453]] Duration: 6 months [[453]] Status/Outcome: No significant adverse events; drug caused a decrease in Gadolinium-enhanced lesions, annualized relapse rate, and disability score [[453]] Trial name: Frohman et al., Clin Neuropharm, March-April 2004 trial [[457]] Phase: Retrospective medical record review [[457]] Study Design: Retrospective surveillance study [[457]] Disease Stage: 61 patients with SPMS, 14 with RRMS, 4 with PPMS [[457]] Enrollment/Number of Patients: Followed 79 patients (44 already on interferon beta , 20 already on glatiramer acetate, 15 on monotherapy); 22 stopped treatment due to side effects, continued disease progression, or lack of insurance coverage [[457]] Duration: One year [[457]] Status/Outcome: Treatment appeared to be well-tolerated and several patients seemed to stabilize or improve [[457]] |
| Natalizumab |
Trial name: Natalizumab Safety and Efficacy in Relapsing Remitting Multiple Sclerosis (AFFIRM) (publ 2006; additional analyses publ 2011, 2013) [[391]] [[4545]] [[4443]] Phase: Phase III trial [[391]] Study Design: Multinational, randomized, placebo-controlled trial to study the efficacy and safety of natalizumab (300 mg, intravenous infusion every 4 weeks), with the primary endpoint at one year being the rate of clinical relapse and the primary endpoint at two years the cumulative probability of sustained progression of disability, measured by the Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) [[391]] Disease Stage: RRMS [[391]] Enrollment/Number of Patients: 942 [[391]] Duration: More than 2 years [[391]] Status/Outcome: Drug reduced the rate of clinical relapse by 68% at one year, the risk of sustained progression of disabilty by 42% over two years, and the accumulation of lesions over two years by 83% [[391]]; post hoc analysis showed that natalizumab increased the cumulative probability of improvement in EDSS scores (which correlated with quality of life measurements) by 69% [[4545]]; additional analysis showed that natalizumab rapidly reduced the annualized relapse rate (within 3 months) overall (0.30 versus 0.71 for placebo), even in patients with highly active disease (0.30 versus 0.94) [[4443]] Trial name: Safety and Efficacy of Natalizumab in Combination with Interferon Beta-1a in Patients with Relapsing Remitting Multiple Sclerosis (SENTINEL) (publ 2006) [[390]] Phase: Phase III trial [[390]] Study Design: Multinational, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group trial to determine if natalizumab (300 mg intravenously every 4 weeks) together with interferon beta-1a (30 microg intramuscularly every week) is more effective than interferon beta-1a alone in reducing breakthrough disease activity in patients who had received interferon beta-1a treatment for at least 12 months before randomization in study (with at least one relapse in the 12 months before randomization), with the rate of clinical relapse at 1 year and the cumulative probabilty of disability progression at 2 years the primary end points [[390]] Disease Stage: RRMS [[390]] Enrollment/Number of Patients: 1171, with 1003 completing the study [[390]] Duration: 2 years [[390]] Status/Outcome: Combination therapy was associated with a 23% cumulative probability of sustained disability progression at 2 years versus 29% with interferon beta-1a alone; combination therapy reduced the risk of sustained disability progression by 24% and reduced the annualized rate of relapse by 54% (at 1 year) and 55% (at 2 years) as compared to interferon beta-1a alone; trial was stopped 1 month early because of two cases of progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy, one of which was fatal [[390]] Trial name: Miller et al., N. Engl. J. Med., Jan 2003 trial [[397]] Phase: Phase II trial [[397]] [[4535]] Study Design: Company-sponsored, multinational, randomized, placebo-controlled trial to test the efficacy of natalizumab (3 mg or 6 mg per kg of body weight every 28 days, by intravenous infusion) in reducing the number of new gadolinium-enhancing brain lesions (primary end point) [[397]] Disease Stage: RRMS or SPMS [[397]] Enrollment/Number of Patients: 213 [[397]] Duration: 6 months [[397]] Status/Outcome: Drug reduced the mean number of new inflammatory brain lesions per patient [such that there were 0.7 (3 mg dose) and 1.1 (6 mg dose) versus 9.6 (placebo)] and reduced the number of relapses [[397]] Trial name: Tubridy et al., Neurology, Aug 1999 trial [[405]] Phase: Phase II trial [[405]] Study Design: Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial to study the effect of natalizumab (two intravenous infusions 4 weeks apart) on brain lesions (followed up for 24 weeks), as measured by MRI [[405]] Disease Stage: RRMS and SPMS [[405]] Enrollment/Number of Patients: 72 [[405]] Duration: 28 weeks [[405]] Status/Outcome: Drug was associated with fewer new active lesions per patient (mean 1.8 versus 3.6 for placebo) in the first 12 weeks of followup, but no difference was seen in the second 12 weeks [[405]] Trial name: Sheremata et al., Neurology, Mar 1999 trial (publ 1999) [[406]] Phase: Phase I trial [[406]] Study Design: Randomized, placebo-controlled, five-level dose escalation study to examine the safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics of a single intravenous dose of natalizumab (0.03 to 3.0 mg per kg) [[406]] Disease Stage: RRMS and SPMS [[406]] Enrollment/Number of Patients: 28 [[406]] Duration: 8 weeks [[406]] Status/Outcome: All doses were found to be safe and serum concentrations of drug (after infusion of 1 to 3 mg per kg) were detectable for 3 to 8 weeks [[406]] |
Trial name: Rinaldi et al., Mult. Scler., May 2012 trial [[1697]] Phase: Postmarketing [[1697]] Study Design: Prospective study to determine the efficacy of natalizumab versus interferon beta-1a or glatiramer acetate in reducing the accumulation of new cortical lesions [[1697]] Disease Stage: RRMS [[1697]] Enrollment/Number of Patients: 120 [[1697]] Duration: 2 years [[1697]] Status/Outcome: Natalizumab reduced the accumulation of new cortical lesions and the progression of cortical atrophy as compared to interferon beta-1a, glatiramer acetate, or no treatment [[1697]] |
Trial name: Jokubaitis et al., PLoS One, March 2013 study [[5370]] Phase: Prospective cohort study [[5370]] Study Design: Multicenter Australian cohort study using the MSBase platform to characterize use of disease-modifying therapies (DMTs, which included interferon beta, glatiramer acetate, and natalizumab); specifically, treatment persistence, factors that predict treatment discontinuation, and rates of switching between DMTs were studied [[5370]] Disease Stage: RRMS [[5370]] Enrollment/Number of Patients: 1113 [[5370]] Duration: 4.2 years (median time patients were followed) [[5370]] Status/Outcome: Treatment persistence in this study was short, such that patients remained on their first DMT for 2.5 years (median) and on their next DMT for 2.3 years; annualized switch or cessation rates were 9.5 to 12.5% (interferon beta), 11.6% (glatiramer acetate), and 4.4% (natalizumab); younger age and higher disability scores predicted DMT discontinuation [[5370]] Trial name: Comparison of Patients Treated with Natalizumab and Interferon-Beta/Glatiramer Using Propensity-Matched Multiple Sclerosis Registry Data (press release, 18 March 2013) [[5315]] Phase: Retrospective medical record review [[5315]] Study Design: Data from two MS patient registries [TYSABRI Observational Program (TOP) and MSCOMET] were used in a propensity-matched analysis to compare the effects of natalizumab, interferon beta, and glatiramer acetate on relapses [[5315]] Disease Stage: MS [[5315]] Enrollment/Number of Patients: N/A [[5315]] Duration: N/A [[5315]] Status/Outcome: Natalizumab was associated with a lower rate of first relapse as compared to interferon beta and glatiramer acetate; relapses in patients treated with natalizumab also occurred more slowly than in those treated with the other drugs [[5315]] Trial name: Sargento-Freitas et al., J. Clin. Neurosci., February 2013 study [[5251]] Phase: Observational/open-label study [[5251]] Study Design: Study to determine the factors that predict the best clinical response to natalizumab, in patients who had received treatment for at least 12 months; optimal responders were defined as those who exhibited a reduction in the Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) score of ≥1 point or a reduction in the annualized relapse rate (ARR) of >1 [[5251]] Disease Stage: MS [[5251]] Enrollment/Number of Patients: 48 [[5251]] Duration: At least 12 months of treatment [[5251]] Status/Outcome: Factors linked with an optimal response to natalizumab were (i) an ARR ≥2 in the previous year, (ii) age ≤37.5 years at the time of first drug administration, (iii) an EDSS score at baseline of ≤4.5, (iv) disease duration ≤9.5 years, and (v) a progressive phase of ≤4.5 years (in patients with SPMS), whereas initial disease characteristics did not influence responsiveness [[5251]] Trial name: Kornek et al., JAMA Neurol., February 2013 study [[4993]] Phase: Retrospective analysis [[4993]] Study Design: Study to examine the effects of natalizumab (300 mg every 4 weeks) in pediatric patients who began such treatment before 18 years of age, with main outcome measures that included annualized relapse rates (ARRs), Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) scores, and MRI measures [[4993]] Disease Stage: Highly active pediatric MS [[4993]] Enrollment/Number of Patients: 20 [[4993]] Duration: 20 months (mean treatment duration) [[5086]] Status/Outcome: Treatment was linked with decreases in the mean ARR (3.7 without treatment versus 0.4 with treatment), the median EDSS scores (2 without treatment versus 1 with treatment), and the mean number of new lesions detected by MRI (specifically, T2/fluid attenuated inversion recovery lesions) per year (7.8 before treatment versus 0.5 with treatment); thus, natalizumab treatment might be safe and effective in pediatric patients, although some adverse clinical effects were seen [[4993]] Trial name: Ghezzi et al., Mult. Scler., February 2013 study [[4922]] Phase: Observational/open-label study [[4922]] Study Design: Non-sponsored, prospective, cooperative study to examine the long-term effects of natalizumab (300 mg, given intravenously every 4 weeks) in pediatric MS patients (mean age, 14.4 years) [[4922]] Disease Stage: Active MS [[4922]] Enrollment/Number of Patients: 55 [[4922]] Duration: Median, 104 weeks (26 infusions) [[4922]] Status/Outcome: All patients tolerated natalizumab well and the majority experienced strong suppression of disease activity; over the course of treatment, the mean Expanded Disability Status Scale score decreased from 2.7 to 1.9 and most patients were free from MRI activity during the followup [[4922]] Trial name: Sempere et al., Acta Neurol. Scand., January 2013 trial [[4662]] Phase: Observational/open-label study [[4662]] Study Design: Observational study to examine the effects of switching from natalizumab (after treatment of more than 1 year) to fingolimod in JC virus-positive patients; after natalizumab withdrawal, patients received methylprednisolone for 3 months followed by oral fingolimod (0.5 mg) daily [[4662]] Disease Stage: RRMS [[4662]] Enrollment/Number of Patients: 8 JC virus-positive patients who switched drugs and 9 JC virus-negative patients who did not switch [[4662]] Duration: Patients received fingolimod for 4 to 12 months (mean, 9 months); patients who continued receiving natalizumab had a mean followup time of 13 months [[4662]] Status/Outcome: Disease reactivation occurred in patients who switched drugs, with 63% having clinical relapses and 75% showing MRI activity, whereas neither activity was observed in patients who remained on natalizumab [[4662]] Trial name: Cadavid et al., PLoS One, January 2013 study [[4535]] Phase: Retrospective trial review [[4535]] Study Design: Company-sponsored retrospective review of clinical trial results to determine the effects of natalizumab or interferon beta-1a on ambulatory function, as measured by a timed 25-foot walk, in subjects with an Expanded Disability Status Scale score ≥3.5; a response was defined as a faster walking time relative to the predose walking time over different treatment periods (6-9 months or 24-30 months) [[4535]] Disease Stage: RRMS and SPMS [[4535]] Enrollment/Number of Patients: N/A [[4535]] Duration: N/A [[4535]] Status/Outcome: More (2-4 times as many) disabled patients showed a response in the timed 25-foot walk in the natalizumab groups than in the placebo or interferon beta-1a groups; responders were 24%-45% faster than those who did not respond; natalizumab appears to improve walking function in RRMS and potentially in SPMS [[4535]] Trial name: Stephenson et al., Health Qual. Life Outcomes, December 2012 study [[4365]] Phase: Observational study [[4365]] Study Design: Longitudinal study to determine the effect of natalizumab on patient-reported outcomes, including the ability to carry out daily activities, cognitive functioning, fatigue, and disability level, in a real-world setting [[4365]] Disease Stage: RRMS [[4365]] Enrollment/Number of Patients: 333 [[4365]] Duration: 12 months [[4365]] Status/Outcome: Drug was associated with positive patient-reported outcomes (no further decline or an improvement) in all assessed measures in 69% to 88% of patients [[4365]] Trial name: Yousry et al., Ann. Neurol., November 2012 study [[4391]] Phase: Retrospective review [[4391]] Study Design: Review of MRIs from natalizumab-treated patients with progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy (PML) to define characteristic MRI patterns of PML, to help in the screening for and early diagnosis of PML [[4391]] Disease Stage: MS patients diagnosed with PML in the postmarketing setting [[4391]] Enrollment/Number of Patients: 22 [[4391]] Duration: N/A [[4391]] Status/Outcome: Large, subcortical lesions of several types represented the most frequent lesion pattern in early MRI scans from patients with PML [[4391]] Trial name: Natalizumab Treatment of Progressive Multiple Sclerosis (NAPMS) (meeting presentation, October 2012) [[3772]] [[3773]] Phase: Phase IIa trial [[3772]] [[3773]] Study Design: University hospital-sponsored, open-label, proof-of-concept, single-group assignment trial to study the safety and efficacy of natalizumab in PPMS and SPMS; the trial aims to examine the effect on central nervous system inflammation [by measuring the change in osteopontin levels in cerebrospinal fluid (primary outcome measure)], as well as effects on the expanded disability status scale score, brain volume, and brain lesions (secondary outcome measures) [[3772]] Disease Stage: PPMS and SPMS [[3772]] [[3773]] Enrollment/Number of Patients: 24 [[3772]] Duration: 60 weeks [[3772]] Status/Outcome: Drug reduced inflammation, axonal damage, and demyelination in 17 progressive MS patients (meeting presentation, October 2012) [[3773]] Trial name: Portaccio et al., Eur. J. Neurol., October 2012 study [[3453]] Phase: Pilot study [[3453]] Study Design: Prospective, non-randomized, pilot study to examine the possible benefits of natalizumab versus interferon beta on cognitive changes [[3453]] Disease Stage: RRMS [[3453]] Enrollment/Number of Patients: 26; 12 were treated with natalizumab and 14 with interferon beta [[3453]] Duration: 1.5 years (mean follow-up time) [[3453]] Status/Outcome: Natalizumab treatment was associated with a significantly lower mean number of neuropsychological tests that indicated deteriorating performance, and a significantly lower percentage brain volume change, than was interferon beta treatment, suggesting that natalizumab might help cognitive function by reducing brain atrophy [[3453]] Trial name: TYSABRI Observational Program (TOP) (press release, 11 October 2012; publ of analyses, 2013) [[3589]] [[4443]] Phase: Post-marketing observational study [[3589]] Study Design: Industry-sponsored program to study the long-term safety and efficacy of natalizumab, as well as disease activity and associations between treatment history at baseline and annualized relapse rate (ARR) post baseline in patients treated with natalizumab [[3589]] Disease Stage: RRMS [[3589]] Enrollment/Number of Patients: 4434 (as of 1 June 2012) [[3589]] Duration: 5 years [[3595]] Status/Outcome: Previously treatment-naïve patients (versus previously treated patients), as well as patients with Extended Disability Status Scale scores less than 3.0 at baseline, displayed lower ARRs; serious adverse events were consistent with the known safety profile of this drug [[3589]]; additional analysis showed that natalizumab rapidly reduced the annualized relapse rate (within 3 months) (0.26 for 0-3 months versus 1.99 at baseline) [[4443]] Trial name: TYNERGY trial (press release, 11 October 2012; publ 21 March 2013) [[3589]] [[5491]] Phase: Observational study [[3589]] [[5491]] Study Design: Industry-sponsored, multicenter, single-arm, non-randomized, open-label, prospective, observational study to evaluate changes in MS-related fatigue during natalizumab treatment in patients who were natalizumab treatment-naïve at baseline [[3589]] [[3596]]; the Fatigue Scale for Motor and Cognitive functions questionnaire was used to evaluate fatigue at baseline and after 12 months of treatment [[5491]] Disease Stage: RRMS [[3589]] Enrollment/Number of Patients: 195 [[5491]] Duration: 12 months [[3589]] [[5491]] Status/Outcome: Drug may ameliorate fatigue related to MS; the measured variables (fatigue score, quality of life, sleepiness, depression, cognition, disability progression, and walking speed) all improved after 1 year of natalizumab treatment [[3589]] [[5491]] Trial name: Mellergård et al., PLoS One, September 2012 study [[3310]] Phase: Observational study [[3310]] Study Design: Study that aimed (i) to examine changes in metabolites in normal appearing white matter (NAWM) during natalizumab treatment (300 mg given intravenously once per month), as determined by using quantitative proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy (1H-MRS) to detect such metabolites, and (ii) to examine associations between changes in these 1H-MRS-detected metabolites and markers of ongoing inflammation in the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) [[3310]] Disease Stage: Relapsing MS [[3310]] Enrollment/Number of Patients: 27 MS patients enrolled (with 25 providing CSF samples); 20 healthy controls [[3310]] Duration: 1 year [[3310]] Status/Outcome: Group levels of 1H-MRS-detected metabolite concentrations did not change between pre- and posttreatment periods, but there were correlations between changes in the concentrations of individual 1H-MRS-detected metabolites (total creatine and total choline) and levels of the pro-inflammatory markers interleukin-1 beta and CXCL8 in CSF, such that high levels of those markers were associated with an increase in the metabolites, indicating the ongoing development of gliosis and membrane turnover in NAWM [[3310]] Trial name: Arnal-Garcia et al., Eur. J. Paediatr. Neurol., September 2012 study [[3295]] Phase: Retrospective medical record review [[3295]] Study Design: Study to analyze the safety and effficacy of natalizumab (300 mg given as a monthly infusion, except in one patient who received 150 mg per month) in pediatric patients (mean age, 15 years) [[3295]] Disease Stage: RRMS [[3295]] Enrollment/Number of Patients: 9 [[3295]] Duration: Varied, with patients receiving a median of 17 natalizumab infusions [[3295]] Status/Outcome: Three patients experienced at least one adverse drug reaction; for patients receiving at least 12 infusions, the median annualized relapse rate decreased from 3.0 to 0 and the Expanded Disability Status Scale score decreased from 3.0 to 1.0; as such, the safety and efficacy of natalizumab in the pediatric patients was similar to that in adult patients [[3295]] Trial name: Wickström et al., Mult. Scler., September 2012 study [[3263]] Phase: Observational study [[3263]] Study Design: Study to examine the effects of natalizumab on the ability to work [[3263]] Disease Stage: MS [[3263]] Enrollment/Number of Patients: All MS patients in Sweden who began natalizumab treatment between June 2007 and May 2008 [[3263]] Duration: 1 year [[3263]] Status/Outcome: In relation to patients' total employment rate, natalizumab approximately doubled their working ability; a positive effect was more likely in those with short disease duration, younger age, and a lower Expanded Disability Status Scale score when treatment began [[3263]] Trial name: Prosperini et al., J. Neurol. Sci., September 2012 study [[3260]] Phase: Observational study [[3260]] Study Design: Study that aimed to identify baseline predictors of natalizumab response; clinical and MRI data were prospectively collected from patients treated with natalizumab who were then followed and ranked according to their responses to the drug [[3260]] Disease Stage: RRMS [[3260]] Enrollment/Number of Patients: 210 [[3260]] Duration: 24 months [[3260]] Status/Outcome: After 24 months, 57.1% of patients were full responders to natalizumab [no relapses, no worsening of disability on the Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS), no MRI activity], 17.1% were partial responders (MRI activity, but no relapses and/or worsening of EDSS score), and 25.8% were poor responders (relapses and/or worsening of EDSS score); a full response was more likely in patients with ≤2 relapses in the year before treatment started and in those with an EDSS score ≤2.5 at baseline [[3260]] Trial name: Lu et al., Neurology, Aug 2012 study [[2959]] Phase: Retrospective literature review [[2959]] Study Design: Systematic review of the literature for information about the effects of interferon beta, glatiramer acetate, or natalizumab on the offspring of MS patients who used these disease-modifying drugs (DMDs) during pregnancy [[2959]] Disease Stage: MS [[2959]] Enrollment/Number of Patients: 35 natalizumab-exposed pregnancies were identified [[2959]] Duration: N/A [[2959]] Status/Outcome: Natalizumab exposure during pregnancy was not associated with reduced mean birth length or weight or lower mean gestational age, but discontinuing DMD use before conception continues to be recommended [[2959]] Trial name: Bloomgren et al., N. Engl. J. Med., May 2012 study [[1821]] Phase: Retrospective medical record review [[1821]] Study Design: Company-funded, retrospective review to quantify risk factors for progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy (PML) associated with natalizumab treatment; factors considered were (i) the presence of anti JC-virus antibodies (JC, or John Cunningham, virus is present in many people; it causes diseases such as PML only with immunodeficiency or immunosuppression), (ii) previous use of immunosuppressants, and (iii) duration of natalizumab treatment [[1821]] Disease Stage: MS patients treated with natalizumab [[1821]] Enrollment/Number of Patients: 99,571 patients treated with natalizumab; blood samples were available from 5896 MS patients and from 54 MS patients treated with natalizumab who developed PML later [[1821]] Duration: Duration of treatment was classified as either 1 to 24 months or 25 to 48 months [[1821]] Status/Outcome: 212 confirmed cases of PML had occurred in 99,571 patients treated with natalizumab as of 29 Feb 2012 (2.1 cases per 1000 patients), and the 54 PML patients for whom blood samples were available all were positive for anti-JC antibodies; overall, the presence of anti-JC antibodies, use of immunosuppressants before natalizumab treatment, and 25 to 48 months of natalizumab treatment were associated with the greatest estimated risk of PML (11.1 cases per 1000 patients) [[1821]] Trial name: Trampe et al., Neurology, May 2012 study [[1815]] Phase: Retrospective medical record review [[1815]] Study Design: Blinded, retrospective cross-sectional and longitudinal analysis to assess anti-JC virus antibody status before diagnosis of progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy (PML) (JC, or John Cunningham, virus is present in many people; it causes diseases such as PML only with immunodeficiency or immunosuppression) [[1815]] Disease Stage: MS patients treated with natalizumab [[1815]] Enrollment/Number of Patients: 2253 patients [[1815]] Duration: N/A [[1815]] Status/Outcome: 58.8% of patients treated with natalizumab tested positive for anti-JC virus antibodies; 9.8% of patients converted from negative to positive over 7.7 months and 4.7% converted from positive to negative over 7.9 months; in general, antibody levels were low; and all samples from the 10 patients who developed PML were positive and antibody levels in these samples were higher than in antibody-positive samples from patients who did not develop PML [[1815]] Trial name: Del Santo et al., Eur. J. Clin. Pharmacol., April 2012 study [[2482]] Phase: Retrospective trial review [[2482]] Study Design: Review of 10 randomized trials that tested interferon, glatiramer acetate, natalizumab, or fingolimod in RRMS, such that the relapse-free rates at 12 months were compared, either directly or through network meta-analysis [[2482]] Disease Stage: RRMS [[2482]] Enrollment/Number of Patients: N/A [[2482]] Duration: N/A [[2482]] Status/Outcome: Fingolimod was determined to have the most favorable profile with respect to relapse-free rate at the follow-up assessment at 1 year [[2482]] Trial name: Ghezzi et al., Neurology, Sept 2010 trial [[349]] Phase: Observational/open-label study [[349]] Study Design: Study to examine the effects of natalizumab (300 mg every 28 days, with a mean treatment period of 15.2 months) in children (younger than 18 years) with active MS [[349]] Disease Stage: Active MS [[349]] Enrollment/Number of Patients: 19 [[349]] Duration: Mean treatment period, 15.2 months [[349]] Status/Outcome: Drug suppressed disease activity, such that the median Expanded Disability Status Scale decreased from 2.5 to 2.0 [[349]] |
| Ocrelizumab |
Trial name: A Study of Ocrelizumab in Patients with Primary Progressive Multiple Sclerosis (ORATORIO) [[655]] [[879]] Phase: Phase III trial [[655]] Study Design: Company-funded, randomized, parallel-group, multi-center, multi-national placebo-controlled study evaluating efficacy of ocrelizumab on delaying progression of disability (primary endpoint) [[655]] Disease Stage: PPMS [[655]] Enrollment/Number of Patients: Estimated enrollment 630 patients [[655]] Duration: 120 weeks to 5.5 years[[655]] Status/Outcome: Recruitment began September 2011 [[655]] |
Trial name: A Study of Ocrelizumab in Comparison with Interferon Beta 1a (Rebif) in Patients with Relapsing Multiple Sclerosis (OPERA I) [[875]] [[879]] Phase: Phase III trial [[875]] Study Design: Company-funded, randomized, double-blind, double-dummy parallel-group, multicenter, multinational study comparing the effect of ocrelizumab (600 mg) to interferon beta-1a on annualized relapse rate (primary endpoint) [[875]] Disease Stage: RRMS [[875]] Enrollment/Number of Patients: Estimated enrollment 800 patients [[875]] Duration: 96 weeks [[875]] Status/Outcome: Recruitment began in September 2011; results are expected in February 2015 [[875]] Trial name: A Study of Ocrelizumab in Comparison with Interferon Beta 1a (Rebif) in Patients with Relapsing Multiple Sclerosis (OPERA II) [[876]] [[879]] Phase: Phase III trial [[876]] Study Design: Company-funded, randomized, double-blind, double-dummy parallel-group, multicenter, multinational study comparing the effect of ocrelizumab (600 mg) to interferon beta-1a on annualized relapse rate (primary endpoint) [[876]] Disease Stage: RRMS [[876]] Enrollment/Number of Patients: Estimated enrollment 800 patients [[876]] Duration: 96 weeks [[876]] Status/Outcome: Recruitment began in August 2011; results are expected in February 2015 [[876]] Trial name: Kappos et al., Lancet, November 2011 trial [[878]] [[5528]] Phase: Phase II trial [[878]] [[879]] [[5528]] Study Design: Company-funded, multicenter, randomized, parallel, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial to test the efficacy and safety of low-dose (600 mg) or high-dose (2000 mg) ocrelizumab, given in two doses on day 1 and day 15, versus interferon beta-1a (30 microg one time per week, intramuscularly); the primary outcome measure was the total number of gadolinium-enhancing T1 lesions at weeks 12, 16, 20, and 24 [[878]] [[879]] [[5528]] Disease Stage: RRMS [[878]] [[879]] [[5528]] Enrollment/Number of Patients: 220 patients [[879]] [[5528]] Duration: Initial phase, 24 weeks [[5528]] Status/Outcome: At 24 weeks, the 600 mg dose of ocrelizumab was associated with an 89% reduction in the number of gadolinium-enhancing lesions as compared to placebo, and the 2000 mg dose a 96% reduction; both doses reduced the number of lesions better than interferon beta-1a [[5528]] |
Trial name: Extension of Kappos et al., Lancet, November 2011 trial; meeting report, March 2013 [[5528]] [[5513]] Phase: Extension of Phase II trial [[5513]] Study Design: Patients originally received placebo, low-dose (600 mg), or high-dose (2000 mg) ocrelizumab, given in two doses on day 1 and day 15, or interferon beta-1a (30 microg one time per week, intramuscularly); from week 24 through 72, patients who had received placebo, interferon beta-1a, or 600 mg ocrelizumab were given 600 mg ocrelizumab every 24 weeks, whereas those who had received 2000 mg ocrelizumab were given 1000 mg every 24 weeks; from week 73 to 96, all patients were given the 600 mg per 24 weeks dose; for the final 48 weeks, no drug was given [[5528]] [[5513]] Disease Stage: RRMS [[5513]] Enrollment/Number of Patients: Of the original 218 patients, 168 remained in the study for the full 144 weeks [[5513]] Duration: 144 weeks [[5513]] Status/Outcome: Gadolinium-enhancing lesion numbers were reduced to zero by week 48, and stayed at zero through week 120, in the patients receiving either dose of ocrelizumab (from mean levels of 1.5 to 4 in the four original groups of patients); lesion number rose to a mean of 0.3 in the final scan; adjusted annualized relapse rates, weeks 96 to 144, were as follows: 0.116 (original placebo group); 0.082 (original low-dose ocrelizumab group); 0.352 (original high-dose ocrelizumab group); 0.076 (original interferon beta-1a group) [[5513]] |
| Ofatumumab |
Trial name: Ofatumumab Dose-finding in RRMS Patients, part A (interim data reported September 2010) [[648]] [[649]] [[650]] Phase: Phase I/ II [[648]] Study Design: Company-funded, randomized, parallel-group, multi-center, multi-national placebo-controlled study evaluating effect of three doses (100mg, 300mg, and 700mg) of ofatumumab on lesion number (primary endpoint) [[648]] [[649]] [[650]] Disease Stage: RRMS [[648]] [[649]] [[650]] Enrollment/Number of Patients: 38 patients in part A; 288 patients expected in part B [[648]] [[649]] [[650]] Duration: 24 weeks part A; 48 weeks part B [[648]] [[649]] [[650]] Status/Outcome: The drug was associated with reduction in gadolinium-enhancing lesions and raised no dose-related or other safety concerns in patients followed for 48 weeks (Part A) [[649]]; part B data expected in September, 2012 [[648]]
Trial name: Ofatumumab Subcutaneous Administration in Subjects With Relapsiing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis (MIRROR) [[651]] Phase: Phase II [[651]] Study Design: Company-funded, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, placebo-controlled multi-center, multi-national study evaluating efficacy of ofatumumab as measured by cumulative number of Gadolinium-enhancing lesions (primary endpoint) [[651]] Disease Stage: RRMS [[651]] Enrollment/Number of Patients: Estimated enrollment 196 patients [[651]] Duration: 24 weeks [[651]] Status/Outcome: Estimated study completion date October 2014 [[651]] |
||
| ONO-4641 |
Trial name: DreaMS (Drug Research Evaluation for Multiple Sclerosis) (reported April 2012) [[626]][[627]] Phase: Phase II [[627]][[2754]] Study Design: Company-sponsored, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter, multinational study examining the effect of three doses of ONO-4641 on total number of gadolinium-enhanced lesions measured every 4 weeks (primary endpoint) [[627]] Disease Stage: RRMS [[627]][[2754]] Enrollment/Number of Patients: 407 patients [[2754]] Duration: 26 weeks [[627]][[2754]] Status/Outcome: Patients given taking 0.05, 0.10, or 0.15 mg of drug had 82 percent, 92 percent and 77 percent fewer Gd-enhancing brain lesions, respectively, compared to placebo; adverse events appeared to be dose related [[2754]] Trial name: A Safety and Efficacy Extension Study of ONO-4641 in Patients With Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis (DreaMS) [[628]] Phase: Phase II [[628]] Study Design: Extension study examining long-term safety and tolerability of ONO-4641(primary endpoint) [[628]] Disease Stage: RRMS [[628]] Enrollment/Number of Patients: Estimated enrollment 376 patients [[628]] Duration: 122 weeks [[628]] Status/Outcome: Results expected June 2014 [[628]] |
||
| Rituximab |
Trial name: Naismith et al., Neurology, Jun 2010 trial [[352]] Phase: Phase II trial [[352]] Study Design: MRI-blinded, single-center study to evaluate the effects of rituximab (375 mg/m2 weekly for four weeks) on gadolinium-enhancing lesions (primary objective) in patients who had been treated with a standard injectable disease-modifying agent in the past 18 months but had shown an inadequate response and were then given rituximab as add-on therapy [[352]] Disease Stage: RRMS [[352]] Enrollment/Number of Patients: 30 [[352]] Duration: 52 weeks, such that the drug was given for the first four weeks and MRI scans were performed monthly beginning 12 weeks after the first drug treatment [[352]] Status/Outcome: Drug caused a reduction in the number of gadolinium-enhancing lesions, such that 74% of posttreatment MRI scans were free of gadolinium-enhancing activity versus 26% of baseline MRI scans [[352]] Trial name: Hawker et al., Ann. Neurol., Oct 2009 trial [[359]] Phase: Phase II/III trial [[359]] Study Design: Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter trial to evaluate the effects of rituximab (two 1000 mg infusions or placebo every 24 weeks) on time to confirmed disease progression (primary endpoint) and T2 lesion volume and total brain volume (secondary endpoints) [[359]] Disease Stage: PPMS [[359]] Enrollment/Number of Patients: 439 [[359]] Duration: 96 weeks [[359]] Status/Outcome: Drug was not associated with a decrease in time to confirmed disease progression (but there was a suggestion of a potential decrease in younger patients, especially those with inflammatory lesions) [[359]] [[484]] Trial name: Hauser et al., N. Engl. Med., Feb 2008 trial [[376]] Phase: Phase II trial [[376]] Study Design: Double-blind, placebo-controlled trial to evaluate the effects of intravenous rituximab (1000 mg or placebo on weeks 1 and 15) on the total count of gadolinium-enhancing lesions (primary endpoint) and on the proportion of patients with relapses [[376]] Disease Stage: RRMS [[376]] Enrollment/Number of Patients: 104 [[376]] Duration: 48 weeks [[376]] Status/Outcome: Drug was associated with a reduced number of inflammatory brain lesions and a reduced number of relapses (14.5% vs 34.3% at week 24 and 20.3% vs 40% at week 48) [[376]] |
Trial name: Bar-Or et al., Ann. Neurol., Mar 2008 trial [[375]] Phase: Phase I trial [[375]] Study Design: Open-label trial to evaluate the safety, tolerability, pharmacodynamics, and activity of two courses of rituximab (total dose, 4000 mg), six months apart, in MS [[375]] Disease Stage: RRMS [[375]] Enrollment/Number of Patients: 26, with 22 completing the trial [[375]] Duration: 72 weeks [[375]] Status/Outcome: The drug was not associated with any serious adverse effects, although mild and moderate infusion-associated events were seen; furthermore, the drug was associated with fewer new gadolinium-enhancing or T2 lesions [[375]] |
|
| RPC1063 |
Trial name: Efficacy and Safety Study of RPC1063 in Relapsing Multiple Sclerosis Patients; also referred to as RPC01-201 (press release, 22 October 2012) [[3775]] [[3776]] Phase: Phase II portion of a Phase II/III trial [[3775]] [[3776]] Study Design: Industry-sponsored, randomized, parallel assignment, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial to study whether an oral, daily dose (low or high) of RPC1063 can effectively reduce the cumulative number of total gadolinium enhancing lesions in relapsing MS (primary outcome measure) from week 12 to week 24 [[3775]] [[3776]] Disease Stage: Relapsing MS [[3775]] [[3776]] Enrollment/Number of Patients: 210 (estimated) [[3776]] Duration: 24 weeks [[3775]] [[3776]] Status/Outcome: Administered to first patient (22 October 2012) [[3775]] |
Trial name: RPC01-201 (press release, 22 October 2012) [[3775]] Phase: Phase III portion of a Phase II/III trial [[3775]] Study Design: Industry-sponsored, randomized, double-blind, double-dummy comparison of RPC1063 (low or high dose) to the active control, interferon beta-1a (weekly 30 microg intramuscular injection), to assess whether RPC1063 can more effectively reduce the rate of relapse at 24 months [[3775]] Disease Stage: Relapsing MS [[3775]] Enrollment/Number of Patients: More than 1100 (expected) [[3775]] Duration: At least 2 years [[3775]] Status/Outcome: Planned, 22 October 2012 [[3775]] |
Trial name: Safety and Tolerability of Orally Administered RPC1063, a Novel S1P1 Receptor Agonist, in Healthy Adult Volunteers (press releases, 27 January 2011 and 9 October 2012) [[3777]] [[3778]] Phase: Phase I trial [[3777]] Study Design: Industry-sponsored, single-site, single ascending and multiple ascending daily dose trial to determine whether RPC1063 meets pre-specified pharmacokinetic, pharmacodynamic, and safety criteria, such as half-life determination for once-a-day dosing and the extent and speed of lymphopenia reversibility [[3777]] Disease Stage: Healthy volunteers [[3777]] Enrollment/Number of Patients: Not reported in press release [[3777]] Duration: Not reported in press release [[3777]] Status/Outcome: Administered to first volunteer (27 January 2011) [[3777]] |
| RTL1000 |
Trial name: Phase 1 Safety Study of RTL1000-(Recombinant T Cell Receptor Ligand) in Subjects With Multiple Sclerosis (published February, 2011) [[427]][[624]] Phase: Phase I [[427]] Study Design: Company-sponsored, randomized, placebo-controlled, escalating dose study to examine safety, laboratory, and disease parameters (primary outcome measures) at 6 dosage levels (20-200 mg) [[427]][[624]] Disease Stage: RRMS and SPMS patients with the HLA-DR2 gene [[427]][[624]] Enrollment/Number of Patients: 34 enrolled, 34 completed the study [[427]][[624]] Duration: 3 months [[427]] Status/Outcome: All subjects tolerated 2-60mg dose [[427]] ; Doses of 100mg and above caused hypotension and diarrhea [[427]] ; Percentage of subjects with gadolinium-positive lesions did not increase [[427]] ; Data suggested decrease in disease activity with increasing dose [[427]] |
||
| Teriflunomide |
Trial name: Phase III Study With Teriflunomide Versus Placebo in Patients With First Clinical Symptom of Multiple Sclerosis (TOPIC) (press release, 25 April 2013) [[5801]] [[5802]] Phase: Phase III trial [[5801]] Study Design: Company-sponsored, international, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel group trial to study the safety and efficacy of teriflunomide (7 mg or 14 mg once a day) in preventing or delaying the conversion of CIS to clinically definite MS (primary endpoint) [[5801]] [[5802]] Disease Stage: CIS [[5801]] [[5802]] Enrollment/Number of Patients: 618 [[5801]] [[5802]] Duration: Up to 108 weeks (placebo-controlled period) [[5801]] Status/Outcome: 14 mg dose was associated with a 43% reduction in risk of conversion to clinically definite MS over 2 years, and the 7 mg dose with a 37% reduction in the risk, relative to placebo [[5802]] Trial name: Teriflunomide Oral in people With relapsing remitting multiplE scleRosis (TOWER) trial (press releases, June 2012 and October 2012) [[2006]] [[3593]] Phase: Phase III trial [[2006]] Study Design: Company-sponsored, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter trial to test the efficacy and safety of oral teriflunomide (7 mg or 14 mg once daily), with the primary endpoint the reduction in the annualized relapse rate (ARR) and the main secondary endpoint the reduction in the risk of 12-week sustained accumulation of disability [[2006]] Disease Stage: RRMS [[2006]] Enrollment/Number of Patients: 1169 [[2006]] Duration: Average duration of drug exposure was 18 months; patients were followed from 48 to 173 weeks [[2006]] Status/Outcome: 14 mg dose (as compared with placebo) was associated with a 36.3% reduction in the ARR and a 31.5% reduction in the risk of 12-week sustained accumulation of disability (as measured by the expanded disability status scale); 7 mg dose was associated with a 22.3% reduction in the ARR and no difference in the risk of 12-week sustained accumulation of disability [[2006]]; 14 mg dose was associated with a 36.3% reduction in ARR (0.319 versus 0.501 for placebo) and a 31.5% reduction in the risk of 12-week sustained accumulation of disability, whereas the 7 mg dose was associated with a 22.3% reduction in ARR (0.389) but did not affect the risk of 12-week sustained accumulation of disability [[3593]] Trial name: Freedman et al., Neurology, May 2012 trial [[1880]] Phase: Phase II trial [[1880]] Study Design: Randomized, placebo-controlled trial to test the safety of oral teriflunomide (7 or 14 mg, once daily) as an add-on therapy to interferon-beta (primary objective); the effects on disease activity were also tested (secondary objectives) [[1880]] Disease Stage: RRMS [[1880]] Enrollment/Number of Patients: 118, with 86 entering the 24-week extension [[1880]] Duration: 24 weeks, with a 24-week extension [[1880]] Status/Outcome: Teriflunomide was generally well tolerated and safe when added to ongoing interferon-beta treatment, such that 4.9%, 8.1%, and 7.9% of patients in the placebo, 7 mg, and 14 mg groups discontinued treatment because of treatment-emergent adverse events; the addition of teriflunomide was also associated with a reduction in the number of gadolinium-enhancing T1 lesions as compared to treatment with interferon-beta alone [[1880]] Trial name: Teriflunomide in Reducing the Frequency of Relapses and Accumulation of Disability in Patients With Multiple Sclerosis (TEMSO) (publ 2011, 2013) [[341]] [[339]] [[5095]] Phase: Phase III trial [[341]] [[339]] Study Design: Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial to test the effects of teriflunomide (7 mg or 14 mg once per day) on the annualized relapse rate (primary endpoint) and the confirmed progression of disability for at least 12 weeks (key secondary endpoint) [[339]]; change in total lesion volume was the principal MRI outcome [[5095]] Disease Stage: RRMS [[339]] Enrollment/Number of Patients: 1088 [[339]] Duration: 108 weeks [[339]] Status/Outcome: Drug reduced annualized relapse rate by 31% (at either dose), disability progression (at 14 mg dose), and lesion load (assayed by MRI) relative to placebo [[341]] [[339]]; additional analysis showed that the positive effects of the drug were consistent across a variety of patient subgroups [[2194]]; 14 mg and 7 mg doses were associated with 67.4% and 39.4% lower increases in total lesion volume as compared to placebo [[5095]]; patients who completed this study were given the option to participate in an extension study with a total duration about about 6 years (from the time the first patient enrolled), to continue receiving 7 mg or 14 mg drug or, if received placebo, to be randomized to receive 7 mg or 14 mg [[581]] Trial name: O'Connor et al., Neurology, Mar 2006 trial [[389]] Phase: Phase II trial [[389]] Study Design: Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial to study the safety and effects of teriflunomide (7 mg or 14 mg per day) on the number of unique and active lesions per MRI scan (primary endpoint) [[389]] Disease Stage: RRMS and SPMS [[389]] Enrollment/Number of Patients: 179 (157 with RRMS and 22 with SPMS) [[389]] Duration: 36 weeks [[389]] |
